Video summary
Powell Trades | Rejection Wicks Dumb Money Concepts
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance / Trading Content Summary
The speaker explains and demonstrates an intraday “rejection block” / “rejection wick” trading concept, emphasizing precise entries around specific price levels to improve risk-reward.
Core Concept: What a Rejection Block Is
A rejection block is described as:
- The start of a wick that forms after price sweeps highs
- Followed by a large rejection wick (a sharp rejection move)
Price may then:
- Pull back to retest
- the start of the wick (sometimes “touches CE,” sometimes simply the wick-start level)
Trade idea: take the trade after price re-enters the rejection block.
“Engineered Liquidity” / Target Zone
A “good trade” is when the rejection block aligns with:
- Built-up liquidity (e.g., after sweeping highs)
- An “engineered liquidity” area right below CE (as described)
Fibonacci Framework / Favored Entry Window (Golden Pocket / OTE)
The speaker references a fib-based entry zone:
- 0.62 to 0.79
- referred to by some as the “golden pocket” / OTE
If a PD array interest aligns with this fib region, it’s presented as higher probability.
Why Rejection Blocks Are Advantageous (Speaker’s View)
The speaker claims rejection blocks can offer:
- “Really really good risk-reward ratios.”
- Improved discount/premium entry
- even if the rejection wick isn’t huge, the entry can still be discounted (or more premium, depending on direction)
They also present it as psychologically appealing:
- The setup may look “scary” to enter (price moves away from you)
- But the speaker argues the “scary” movement reflects manipulation / liquidity hunting, not true continuation.
Example / Execution Details (No Ticker)
- The speaker mentions trading pre-market
- They describe a scenario before New Year’s / before market open
Key execution framing:
- The rejection block is “essentially just the opening price of this candle”
- referencing a 3:00 a.m. candle as the wick’s starting point
Short idea (example):
- A stop could be placed above the high
- They mention “20 points” in that scenario
However:
- They emphasize you can’t be certain price will react specifically to the rejection block versus other zones (e.g., an order block)
- So stop sizing should be based on what you’re willing to risk
Timeframes Mentioned
The approach is said to work across:
- 15-second
- 1-hour
- 4-hour
It’s also used during pre-market.
Change in State of Delivery (Trigger Concept)
If there’s a change in state of delivery, price may:
- Go back down to the rejection block
- Then the speaker takes the entry
This is positioned as a way to time the retest and entry.
Stop-Loss / Entry Positioning Rules (As Stated)
Stop placement
- Typically below the wick that formed the rejection block
- Caution: for very large rejection blocks, stops may become impractically wide
- example given: an “80-point stop” is unrealistic
Entry options
- Enter near CE
- Enter at the 50% (mentioned as an option)
- Enter at the beginning of the wick if you want a more certain fill
Trade selection depends on whether risk becomes too large—i.e., choose the level that keeps the stop reasonable.
Step-by-Step Framework (Compiled)
- Identify a rejection block
- after a liquidity sweep (e.g., taking highs)
- followed by a large rejection wick
- Mark relevant levels
- start of the wick
- CE (when referenced)
- fib-based 0.62–0.79 zone (golden pocket / OTE) if applicable
- Wait for price action
- to tap/retest the POI / PD array / area of interest
- specifically retest the rejection block
- Confirm using context
- speaker example: change in state of delivery
- Enter
- at the beginning of the wick (for higher fill certainty), or
- at CE / 50% (to better control risk)
- Place stop
- below the wick
- avoid stops that are too wide
Numbers and Explicit Cautions / Recommendations
- Fib window: 0.62 to 0.79 (golden pocket / OTE)
- Example stop size: 20 points (in the described short example)
- Caution: very large rejection blocks may require impractically wide stops
- example: “80-point stop”
- Recommendation: only take entries where risk is acceptable and the rejection block aligns with POI / PD array / engineered liquidity.
Disclosures
- No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitles.
Tickers / Assets Mentioned
- None mentioned.
Presenters / Sources Referenced
- An ICT video (mentioned as a link source)
- “the guy who said…” (no name given)
- A general reference to “someone else” for the idea “the best trade is the scariest trade” (name not provided)