EP-219 甘文威：从年入百万到偷渡逃亡，在中国卖VPN会遭遇什么？ | 史上最严VPN禁令丨翻墙会越来越难吗？ | 中国防火长城丨GFW丨梯子 | 远洋捕捞丨夏津公安丨 快连丨不明白播客

Summary of the subtitles (EP-219 甘文威 episode)

The episode discusses China’s tightening VPN crackdown, focusing on what it means for the VPN “circumvention” industry and for users, through the personal account of former VPN operator Gan Wenwei (who later fled China).

1) What changed recently: faster and harsher enforcement

• The host describes a sharp disruption of VPN access in mainland China in recent weeks/months, especially around April.
• A major example is Kuailian VPN (with “tens of millions” of users), announcing a suspension of service on April 28 after being stable for thousands of days.
• Gan argues this crackdown is more intense than earlier rounds, but not aimed at eliminating all VPN use. Instead, it tries to reduce ordinary people’s access as much as possible, while still allowing some cross-border connectivity needed by the economy/foreign trade.

2) How the business works (gray-area industry mechanics)

Gan explains circumvention as an ecosystem rather than a single product:

• Technical method: Firewall systems were initially relatively “simple” (traffic identification/blocking). Circumvention starts with encrypting data to send overseas.
• Service evolution: The industry improved quality (speed/reliability), leading to more complex architectures like BGP relays and “dedicated-line” style relaying.
• Business model: Historically, the industry shifted from B2C to B2B to reduce exposure to direct customer enforcement and registration requirements.

3) Payments and laundering-like workflow (Alipay/WeChat → crypto settlement)

Gan claims VPN operators often collect customer payments via Alipay and WeChat.

• He describes a pipeline where “micro-manufacturers” (he cites “about thirty companies in Wuhan”) provide payment collection services, take a ~10% fee, and then convert RMB to USDT (stablecoin) to settle with VPN providers.
• This framing suggests operators use a layered supply chain to reduce direct traceability.

4) Why VPNs survived previous crackdowns (and what’s different now)

• Earlier enforcement, in his account, often worked through warnings/instructions relayed to telecom/cloud providers, followed by IP replacement, which cost extra money.
• This year is described as different: operators say telecom/cloud providers will take servers offline immediately once flagged, rather than allowing “pay to rotate IP” behavior.
• As a result, Gan claims many services have moved away from in-China data center relays and rely more on direct overseas connections—which may be less stable and may be blocked depending on local network enforcement (city/province differences).

5) Role of telecom/cloud “loopholes” and vested interests

Gan argues the Great Firewall is sustained not only by state design but also by commercial incentives and loopholes:

• Telecom operators and cloud providers may supply “dedicated line” options that can be used for circumvention.
• He alleges there were earlier “free loopholes” in cloud offerings (“classic network” channels) that were later suspended once abuse became widespread.
• He describes escalation from expensive official services to cheaper arrangements via third-party suppliers, and even physical connectivity workarounds (e.g., “hole punching,” leasing/rearranging bandwidth near Hong Kong/Senzhen).
• His key thesis: the firewall functions like a “chain of vested interests,” so crackdowns can sometimes be selective or inconsistent.

6) Scale estimates and “demand” for VPNs

Gan estimates VPN usage in China:

• Worst case: ~10–20 million
• Best case: ~60–100 million
• Median: ~50 million

He disputes the idea that there is one “essential” political-information need:

• He argues VPN users mostly return repeatedly once they’ve accessed it.
• He contrasts political-news spikes (e.g., major political events) with more recent drivers such as AI tool access that requires foreign services.

7) Personal case: arrested, bailed, fled; describes law-enforcement tactics

Gan provides a detailed account of his disappearance:

• He says police targeted him through a long-distance operation involving authorities in Shenzhen and other provinces.
• He claims he was arrested around August 15, 2024 in Wuhan, interrogated by Shenzhen Public Security and the National Security Bureau.
• He alleges:
  • Online tracking and identifiers helped enable the arrest (he humorously notes his Telegram name/profile).
  • A “deep-sea fishing” style investigation involved informants buying small VPNs (~¥15–¥20), then reporting to police, enabling multi-province arrests.
  • Authorities allegedly boasted publicly about successes in arrests and seizures (he cites figures like 50 million RMB and 500,000+ users).
  • He says seized money reportedly vanished or was not properly recorded on paperwork, and he repeatedly asks where the seized assets went.

8) Why he fled and how he left (smuggling routes)

After bail, Gan says he illegally crossed the border with help from human smugglers:

• Travel from China to Guangxi (Nanning → Qinzhou) by car, then transfer to a speedboat toward Vietnam.
• Spend a week in Hanoi at a Chinese-run hotel.
• Plans to ensure his wife and child could travel (using Hong Kong/Macau travel permits), then moving onward to Singapore.
• Ultimately reach the Netherlands via fraudulent/failed visa arrangements, including an agent taking large sums and offering a “shaving passport”/fake solution, then switching to risky transport plans.
• He applied for asylum in the Netherlands around late January 2025 (as described in the subtitles) after a few days.

9) Life in the Netherlands and advice to VPN users

Gan says his family is living in government-provided housing (a three-star hotel), with meals provided, and he works/writes code while focusing on his child’s routine.

• He characterizes the Dutch system as humane and supportive amid a refugee crisis.

Advice to VPN users:

• Don’t rely on large brands; avoid long annual subscriptions because providers could disappear.
• He argues it’s unlikely the entire industry will be fully eliminated, but access will become more expensive and more restricted over time.

---

Presenters / contributors

• Yuan Li — host, “Bumingbai Podcast”
• Gan Wenwei — guest, VPN industry participant; asylum seeker in the Netherlands
• Masa — supporter mentioned during the episode