CB2 2 2

Summary

The lecture covers three connected topics in social psychology and consumer behavior: self-construal, self-awareness, and the limits of introspection when people explain their feelings and choices.

1. Self-construal: How people define themselves

Self-construal is the way people understand themselves in relation to their own qualities and to other people.

• Independent self-construal means defining oneself through one’s own thoughts, feelings, and actions. It emphasizes autonomy, uniqueness, and distinctiveness from others. The lecture describes this orientation as more typical of Western cultures.
• Interdependent self-construal means defining oneself through relationships with others. People with this orientation may be especially attentive to others’ thoughts and feelings and to social harmony. The lecture describes it as more prevalent in East Asian cultures, including Japan.

This cultural framework was proposed by Hazel Markus and Shinobu Kitayama in 1991.

Self-construal scale exercise

The lecturer introduces a shortened version of a scale developed by Singelis (1994):

1. Rate how much you agree or disagree with each of the 10 statements.
2. Average items 1–5 to estimate your interdependence.
3. Average items 6–10 to estimate your independence.
4. For a reaction paper, report which score is higher and briefly describe how independent or interdependent you are in everyday life.

The full scale is described as having 12 items for each orientation; the version shown in the lecture uses five items for each.

2. Self-awareness and behavior

Self-awareness theory proposes that when people focus attention on themselves, they compare their behavior with their personal standards and values.

Self-focused attention can be prompted by situations such as:

• Seeing oneself in a mirror or reflection
• Seeing oneself in a photograph
• Feeling that other people are watching or evaluating oneself

The comparison can lead to different responses:

• If behavior matches one’s standards, there is no discrepancy to resolve.
• If behavior falls short, a person may try to change it.
• If change seems impossible, a person may try to escape the self-focused situation or otherwise reduce self-awareness. The mismatch can also cause discomfort or a negative mood.

For example, someone who believes they should quit smoking may become more aware of the gap between their behavior and their ideal when they see themselves smoking.

A study of 365 high school students found that students were more likely to be in a negative mood when they were thinking about themselves more often. The lecture suggests that self-focus may make people more aware of gaps between their actions and their standards.

The lecture also distinguishes two forms of self-consciousness:

• Private self-consciousness: focusing on and examining one’s own thoughts, feelings, and inner experiences.
• Public self-consciousness: thinking about how one appears to others and how others may judge them.

3. Introspection and explaining feelings

Introspection can involve trying to identify why one feels a certain way. The lecturer cautions that this is often difficult: people may know they feel happy or excited without being able to pinpoint exactly what caused the feeling.

In a five-week study, college students recorded their daily moods and possible predictors, including weather, workload, sleep, and relationships. At the end of the study, they estimated which factors were linked to their moods. Their estimates were often inaccurate. For example, students thought sleep predicted their next-day mood, but the study found that sleep was not related to mood in the way they expected. Getting along with friends was a better predictor of positive mood.

The lecture explains these errors through layperson’s theories—everyday beliefs about what causes feelings and behavior. These beliefs are learned from culture and experience, but they are not always accurate. As a result, people may give mistaken explanations for their own reactions.

4. Implications for consumer research

Because people may rely on familiar but inaccurate causal theories when explaining their feelings, they may not know precisely why they like a brand or buy a product. The lecturer therefore cautions marketers against treating customers’ survey explanations as necessarily accurate accounts of their real motives.

Speakers and sources featured

• Unnamed lecturer: presents the concepts and studies.
• Hazel Markus and Shinobu Kitayama: associated with the 1991 cultural self-construal framework; their pictures are identified as appearing onscreen.
• Singelis (1994): credited with developing the self-construal scale used in the exercise.
• Unnamed researchers and study participants: referenced in the studies of high school students’ self-focused thoughts and college students’ moods.