6000 Remote Viewers See This! Profound Predictions for Humanity! Stephan A. Schwartz

Summary of video subtitles (news/commentary + core arguments)

The video is a discussion between host Michael Sandler and remote-viewing researcher/author Stephan (Stefan) A. Schwartz (also referenced as “Stephan Schwarz”). Schwartz argues that results from thousands of remote-viewing sessions point to a cluster of major societal and environmental disruptions occurring roughly between 2040 and 2045, with major implications for whether humanity “survives” and whether the United States can remain stable.

1) A “confluence” of shocks around 2040–2045

Schwartz’s central claim is that remote viewers converge on a period (2040–2045) when multiple trends intensify together rather than a single event. He frames it as a crossroads:

• Either humanity transforms toward a new political/social model and more sustainable, health-oriented choices,
• Or environmental degradation and toxic factors (e.g., pollution, microplastics, carbon energy, toxins) accelerate to the point of large-scale harm.

He repeatedly emphasizes that his approach is data-driven, based on claimed verifiable correspondences from remote-viewing research.

2) Climate-driven displacement and migration (including major U.S. internal migration)

A major consequence Schwartz emphasizes is large-scale migration inside the United States:

• He says about 50 million Americans could be displaced due to three major U.S. migration drivers, especially:
  • Sea rise/coastal collapse (loss of coastal areas; he cites places like parts of Florida and the Outer Banks)
  • Heat and water scarcity in the Southwest (linked to Colorado River stress)
  • Catastrophic weather events in central regions (he mentions tornado-related instability and repeated rebuilds)

He also discusses economic knock-on effects, particularly housing/insurance collapse in coastal regions (including insurers pulling out in Florida), predicting large value collapses and population shifts.

3) Political “schism” and a split U.S.: “red” vs “blue”

Schwartz claims remote viewers foresee a “great schism” where the country effectively becomes two systems/trajectories (a “red” and “blue” bloc), with real power shifting increasingly to states and regional alliances.

He explicitly denies this will look like a 19th-century-style civil war between two armies, though he says deep conflict and violence may rise.

4) Terrorism and misinformation as major destabilizers

Schwartz argues terrorism evolves and becomes a more complex threat compared with earlier decades, citing the rise of white nationalism as a leading source in the U.S. in the modern era.

He also flags what he calls the weaponization of misinformation / AI-driven deception as a likely dominant risk in the next 10–20 years.

5) Health systems and “profit vs well-being”

Schwartz presents a normative thesis:

• Societies that foster well-being are more efficient, effective, cheaper, and easier to live in.

He says remote viewers and his own analysis suggest the main lever for improving outcomes is governance and policy oriented toward well-being rather than profit extraction.

He criticizes U.S. systems as being organized around profit and power, using health indicators (e.g., maternal mortality, infant mortality, incarceration, education) to argue that “red states” fare worse than “blue states” in social outcomes.

6) Remote viewing methodology and the “probability vs fixed future” framing

Schwartz explains how he interprets remote viewing outcomes:

• Some events (especially “planetary” effects) seem more fixed,
• Personal matters may reflect highest probability rather than certainty.

He describes his research design broadly as:

• Recruiting large numbers of remote viewers,
• Asking them to describe a specific future date/time,
• Scoring/triangulating results for consensus and “low-priority” details.

7) Consciousness and non-local information as the foundation

Beyond the predictions, the video heavily promotes a philosophy of consciousness:

• He argues consciousness is fundamental and causal (citing Einstein and his interpretation of consciousness-first ideas),
• He claims remote viewing demonstrates access to information beyond local senses,
• He links remote viewing and archaeology-style “location finding” to an “eternal self/soul” concept and non-local awareness.

He also recounts his personal origin story: involvement with the Edgar Cayce material, then building early experiments he says led to “distant viewing”/remote viewing.

8) Advice: “quotidian choice” as practical change-making

The conclusion is prescriptive rather than purely predictive. Schwartz’s main actionable idea is “the quotidian choice”:

• Daily, ordinary decisions should be made by choosing the option that is most compassionate and life-affirming,
• He suggests telling others and building that practice socially,
• He argues these small choices compound into broader political/economic outcomes (even claiming it could influence election outcomes).

He recommends practical behaviors like meditation and researching whether companies support well-being (he mentions organic products as an example of value-based consumption).

9) UAP/UFO questions: skepticism about imminent “galactic contact”

When asked about extraterrestrials/UAPs, Schwartz says remote viewers don’t focus heavily on that timeframe.

His personal view is that any “watching” is non-aggressive—more like cultural observation—and that a major contact event would be more likely after 2060 (if it happens), tied to humanity reaching a more well-being-oriented trajectory.

10) Hope with geographic inequality

He ends with hope tempered by uneven regional outcomes:

• Some areas/countries (he cites Scandinavian countries, the Netherlands, and New Zealand) are portrayed as moving toward well-being,
• Authoritarian/oligarchic models are portrayed as moving the other way,
• The divergence may intensify over the next 20–30 years.

---

Presenters / contributors

• Michael Sandler (host, Inspire Nation)
• Stephan (Stefan) A. Schwartz / Stephan Schwarz (remote viewing expert; main guest)
• “Hana bear” (appears briefly on-camera at the end; likely a personal companion/child)