Video summary
CA Inter Audit | Ch - 8 | CARO 2020 | Revision Sessions by CA Rishabhh Jainn Sir #cainter
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas / concepts covered
- Covers “CARO 2020” (Company Auditors Report Order, 2020) in the context of CA Intermediate audit revision
- Emphasizes how CARO connects to audit reporting duties under the Companies Act, especially Section 143(11)
- Explains when CARO 2020 applies (applicability conditions and exceptions)
- Focuses on the structure of CARO reporting:
- The audit report commonly has a section heading such as “Reporting on other legal and regulatory requirements”
- CARO matters may be presented via annexure / annexed format
- Clarifies CARO for Standalone Financial Statements (SFS) vs Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS):
- CARO 2020 is generally for SFS
- CFS coverage is through a specific clause: Clause 21
- Provides a clause-wise revision approach, mainly covering Clauses 1 to 21 (with deeper focus on selected clauses)
Methodology / clause-by-clause instruction style content
A) “Duty of auditor” link (Section 143(11))
- Section 143(11) requires the auditor to include certain matters, as applicable, in connection with the Companies Act audit report where CARO is applicable.
- Exam takeaway: when asked about the “duty of auditor”, link the answer to Section 143(11) and the inclusion of CARO-related matters.
- Uses guidance note vs statement wording to stress that CARO-related items are mandatory, not optional.
B) Applicability of CARO 2020 (who CARO applies to)
- CARO 2020 applicability is described as covering “every company including a foreign company” with specific exceptions.
- Explicit exceptions mentioned:
- Banking company (not applicable)
- Insurance company (not applicable)
- Section 8 company (not applicable)
- One Person Company (not applicable)
- Small company (not applicable)
Private Limited company threshold conditions (logic emphasized)
CARO applies to a Private Limited only if all listed conditions are met (as taught—four conditions):
- Not a subsidiary/holding relation of a public entity
- Paid-up share capital and reserves do not exceed ₹1 crore
- Total borrowings do not exceed ₹1 crore “at any point of time”
- Total revenue (Schedule III concept) does not exceed ₹10 crore
Key logic emphasized:
- Use current-year financials (since the CARO report is tied to the audit cycle)
- Revenue may include:
- other income
- revenues from discontinued operations (as explained)
C) SFS vs CFS (Consolidated vs Standalone) — key exam logic
- Baseline principle: CARO 2020 is mainly relevant to SFS
- CARO does not apply to CFS audit report in the same general manner as SFS
- Clause 21 is specifically for Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS)
Clause partition logic used in teaching
- Clauses 1 to 20: apply to standalone financial statements
- Clause 21: applies to consolidated financial statements (CFS)
Clause-wise revision: what to focus on (core content)
Clause 1 — PPE / Property, Plant and Equipment (PP)
What the auditor checks / company responsibilities (as taught):
- Proper records maintained for PPE, including quantity and condition/status
- Physical verification at reasonable intervals
- Common benchmark mentioned: once every 2–3 years
- Note made that practice may be moving toward more frequent checks (even annually)
- If differences found:
- check whether adjustments are made
- Title deeds of immovable properties
- Should be in the name of the company
- If deeds are held by a bank/financial institution due to charge/mortgage:
- original deeds may be with the bank; auditor checks using certified copies / confirmations
- If not held in company’s name:
- ensure proper disclosure is made
- Revaluation
- must be by a registered valuer
- if revaluation leads to ≥ 10% change (threshold explained), disclosures are required
- Benami property
- check whether disclosures regarding benami / related proceedings exist and are reported properly
Teaching approach:
- Read carefully the sub-requirements tied to:
- title deed disclosures
- benami and related disclosure lines
Clause 2 — Inventory
- Auditor checks whether management performs physical verification of inventory at reasonable intervals
- If discrepancies arise:
- determine whether discrepancies are material
- taught threshold: 10% or more (linked to schedule/disclosure logic)
- If material discrepancies exist:
- auditor reports accordingly under the CARO structure (speaker links to Schedule 3)
Also referenced:
- SA 501 (used conceptually as support for inventory audit)
Clause 3 — Loans and Advances given
Major focus: “loans and advances given during the year”
- Auditor reports:
- total amount of loans/advances given during the year
- outstanding balance as at 31 March
- Coverage includes:
- loans/advances to related parties and non-related parties
- Checks include:
- terms/conditions are not prejudicial to the company’s interest
- whether there is a repayment schedule
- whether repayments are made regularly
- If overdue:
- include days outstanding (example taught: more than 90 days)
- total overdue amount and nature
- management’s reasonable steps for recovery
- if renewals/extensions/new loans are used to settle old dues:
- report amounts and reasons
Special/risk situations discussed:
- Loans to promoter group / directors / their relatives (treated as related-party risk)
- Loans on demand without specified repayment terms (flagged as dangerous / reportable)
- Money utilized for subsidiaries/JVs/associates (utilization-based emphasis)
Clause 5 — Public deposits (as described later)
- If public deposits are accepted:
- company must comply with Sections 73 to 76
- Auditor checks:
- whether acceptance and compliance are done as required
- whether filings/requirements under those sections were met
Clause 7 — Statutory Dues
Core teaching points:
- Statutory dues to government departments:
- taxes, duties, PF, etc.
- Dispute vs non-dispute:
- No dispute: company should make regular payments
- Dispute: disclosures/table are required
- Time-based threshold taught:
- outstanding for more than six months from due date to financial year end → needs reporting under Clause 7
- Disclosures:
- if dispute exists, prepare a table including:
- statute name
- amount
- period
- forum/authority where dispute is pending
- if dispute exists, prepare a table including:
Clause 8 — Tax assessment / surrender / disclosure (as referenced)
- If tax assessment concluded that unrecorded income was surrendered/added:
- auditor checks whether the surrendered/unrecorded income appears in books
- if not, it becomes a reporting issue
Clause 9 — Borrowings and repayment (and related risks)
Borrowings (liability side):
- Auditor reports details of default in repayment:
- principal and/or interest
- lender-wise details
- due dates and outstanding amounts
- duration of default and reasons
- Also covers reporting when:
- company has declared “wilful default” by bank/financial institution (highlighted as a negative creditworthiness indicator requiring reporting/disclosure)
Purpose utilization checks:
- Whether funds borrowed for a short-term purpose are not used for long-term purposes
Group/utilization mismatch examples discussed:
- Money used in subsidiaries/JVs/associates (borrower vs utilization mismatch)
- Security pledged arrangements
Clause 17 & Clause 18 — Auditors’ resignation / related compliance idea
- Focuses on reporting context around:
- auditor resignation during the year
- reasons/concerns considered and acceptance conditions
- “NOC” notion referenced
- Positioned as a “sometimes MCQ” type clause in the session
Clause 20 — CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility)
- If Section 135 applies:
- rules for unspent CSR amounts
- transfers within six months from financial year expiry (for non-ongoing projects)
- For ongoing projects:
- unspent amounts allocated to ongoing projects must be transferred to a separate bank account within 30 days
- funds used within a specified time horizon (speaker mentions within three years)
- Auditor checks whether commitments/transfers/use follow the statutory schedule
Clause 21 — CFS-specific requirement (Consolidated Financial Statements)
What Clause 21 addresses:
- When CARO 2020 is examined for CFS, Clause 21 requires the CFS auditor to address SFS qualifications/adverse remarks of subsidiaries.
Reporting method taught:
- Create a mapping/table for each subsidiary, e.g.:
- subsidiary name
- which clause(s) (e.g., clause 5) indicate a problem
- whether the subsidiary’s auditor has reported:
- qualifications or adverse remarks
- include the paragraph number where such remarks appear
- Emphasis: this helps CFS users understand subsidiary-specific compliance issues
Speakers / sources featured (as mentioned in the subtitles)
- CA Rishabhh Jainn Sir (instructor/speaker)
- Companies Act, 2013 (especially Section 143(11) and other referenced provisions)
- CARO 2020
- SA 501 (referenced for inventory auditing concept)
- Central Government (referenced for applicability/requirements under 143(11))
- RBI / NCLT / relevant regulators (mentioned generally in deposit/procedure context; not fully sourced by speaker)
- Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (referenced in auditor resignation context)