Video summary
[입시KU:티비] 수시모집요강 읽어주는 건대 2편: 학생부위주(2027학년도)
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas & lessons conveyed
- Purpose of the video (Part 2): A KU (Konkuk University) admissions officer and a student host “walk through” Student Record-based admission for the 2027 early/rolling admissions guidelines, explaining it in an applicant-friendly way.
- Student Record-based admissions make up a large share of early/rolling admissions—so applicants should focus on these tracks first.
- Two big categories within student record admissions
- Student Record Subject Screening (includes a Regional Balance track)
- Student Record Comprehensive Screening (includes multiple tracks such as self-recommendation, equal opportunity, special education, opportunity balance, and specialized high school categories), with different selection structures.
- Different tracks emphasize different evaluation components
- Subject Screening (Regional Balance): weighted toward
- quantitative academic performance (70%)
- qualitative subject/curriculum performance (30%)
- Comprehensive Screening: uses a broader qualitative review across school life records, focusing more on process, preparation, effort, and changes rather than only outcomes.
- Subject Screening (Regional Balance): weighted toward
- Evaluation elements differ by recruiting unit
- Departmental recruitment (typical departments): emphasizes career competency more heavily.
- KU School of Liberal Studies: emphasizes growth capability more heavily.
- Interview preparation guidance
- Interviews are individual, character-focused, relatively short, and follow practical rules (e.g., blind format; no school uniforms).
- Good news: self-recommendation interview opportunities increased.
- Critical deadline “gotchas”
- Many applicants fail by missing application/document dates or fee payment deadlines.
- If a required fee (Level 2 exclusive fee) isn’t paid by the deadline, applicants lose eligibility for Stage 2.
- Document submission clarification
- A “school life record alternative form” is only for applicants who lack a school life record.
Methodology / selection process (detailed bullet points)
A) Student Record-based admissions: overall structure (as described)
- Start point: Check the admissions summary table (page 11 of the rolling/early admissions guidelines).
- Two main branches
- Student Record Subject Screening
- Includes: K Regional Balance track
- Student Record Comprehensive Screening
- Includes: KU Self-Recommendation, Students with Special Educational Needs, Opportunity Balance, Specialized High School Graduates, and Specialized High School Graduates Currently Employed
- Student Record Subject Screening
- Overall significance
- About 80.8% of rolling admissions are handled through student record-based screening (around 8% selected via this component, as stated).
B) Student Record Subject Screening (K Regional Balance track)
- Total students recruited (this year): 345
- Important weighting (selection method)
- 70% from Student Record Subject Quantitative
- 30% from Student Record Subject Qualitative
- CSAT/standard exam
- CSAT “physical resistance standards” are not applied (per the subtitle wording).
- Quantitative component: grade/subject approach
- Quantitative evaluation uses:
- Rank grades and earned credits across Korean, Math, English, Science, Social Studies, Korean History
- Grade conversion method
- Each rank grade converts into a standard score out of 10
- Example mapping:
- Grade 1 = 10
- Grade 2 = 9.97
- Grade 3 = 9.94
- Grade 4 = 9.9
- Differences are described as very fine-grained (within two decimal places).
- Covered period (student vs. graduate)
- Current students: up to 1st semester of 3rd year
- Graduates: up to 2nd semester of 3rd year
- Quantitative evaluation uses:
- What is not included in the quantitative component
- Career elective subjects that generate achievement scores are not reflected (as stated).
- Qualitative (30%) curriculum achievement evaluation
- Focuses on progress in subject learning (not the entire school-life record)
- Interpreted as assessing academic impact beyond GPA by examining learning process and class-time attitude
- Two evaluation elements (total 300 points):
- Curriculum quality → 300 total points split
- Academic ability: 200 / 300
- includes subject achievement and class attitude
- Career competency: 100 / 300
- includes effort completing major-related courses and achievement level in those courses
- Academic ability: 200 / 300
- Curriculum quality → 300 total points split
C) Student Record Comprehensive Screening (multi-stage + single-stage)
1) Qualitative document evaluation concept (baseline)
- Qualitatively and comprehensively evaluates all areas of the school life record
- Emphasis is on preparation process, effort, and changes after activities
- Compared to Subject Screening:
- Comprehensive review is broader and process-focused, not only subject-curriculum progress.
2) Multi-stage (interview included) tracks
- For KU Self-Recommendation and special education candidates
- Multi-stage selection
- Stage 1: document-only
- 100% evaluation based on documents
- Stage 2: documents + interview
- 70% from Stage 1 document score
- 30% from interview score
- Capacity rule (as described)
- Selects 3 times the number of available spots in Stage 1
3) Single-stage (interview not included) tracks
- Tracks named (as described):
- Equal Opportunity
- Specialized High School Graduates
- Specialized High School Graduates (employed/working professionals)
- Weighting
- 70% documents + 30% academic performance from the student record
- Note: these tracks do not include interviews.
D) Eligibility requirements (for Regional Balance / subject screening, as stated)
Applicants must be:
- Graduates or prospective graduates
- Have completed at least 5 semesters at a domestic high school
- Must receive a recommendation from the high school principal
Recommendation quota detail
- No limit on how many recommendations per high school
- But submission via the principal’s recommendation list is mandatory
E) How evaluation criteria differ by recruiting unit (Comprehensive Screening document review)
1) Departmental recruitment (typical departments)
- Document evaluation uses three factors:
- Academic competency
- Career competency
- Community competency
- Scoring weights (as stated)
- Academic competency: 300
- Career competency: 400
- Community competency: 300
- What each factor includes
- Academic ability: academic achievement, academic aptitude, inquiry skills
- Career ability: effort + achievement completing major-related courses; plus career exploration activities/experience
- Community competence: collaboration/communication; generosity/integrity/rule compliance; leadership
2) KU School of Liberal Studies (K Liberal Arts in subtitles)
- No specific major requirement at entry
- Emphasizes growth capabilities instead of career capabilities
- Evaluation factors:
- Academic ability
- Growth potential
- Community capacity
- Scoring weights (as stated)
- Academic ability 200
- Growth ability 500
- Community ability 300
- Inquiry skills are assessed within growth capabilities.
3) KU Department labeled as “KU Department of Autonomous Engineering” (as mentioned)
- Major exploration happens after admission:
- Students explore their major for two semesters after admission
- Subtitle-indicated differences:
- Academic competence excludes inquiry skills (but includes academic attitude)
- Growth competency includes: self-directedness, creative problem-solving, diversity of experience
- Community competency aligns similarly with other departments
F) Interview preparation & interview rules (for multi-stage screening)
- Format
- Individual interview
- Two evaluators + one applicant
- About 10 minutes per person
- Blind interview rules
- Names, student numbers (“Suwon numbers”), and high school names are hidden
- No school uniforms
- What is assessed
- “Diligence in school life” comprehensively, with a focus on character
- Recommended resources
- KU admissions office website: “KU TV videos”
- “K6 Student Record-based Admission Guidebook”
- Encouragement due to quota increase (self-recommendation)
- Self-Recommendation quota increased by 33
- Since Stage 1 selects 3× spots, that implies 99 additional students receive interview opportunities
- Interview date variability
- Track-specific interview dates may differ (e.g., Dec 5 vs Dec 6)
- Example: Department of Architecture
- no asterisk → Sunday, December 6, 2026
- Self-recommendation may include multiple interview dates—check the asterisk-marked differences.
G) Application schedule & key deadlines (Early admissions at KU, as stated)
- Application period (early admission)
- Tue, Sep 8, 10:00 AM to Fri, Sep 11, 5:00 PM
- Document submission + online entry due
- Tue, Sep 15, 5:00 PM (17:00)
- Principal recommendation list entry period (Regional Balance)
- Mon, Sep 14, 9:00 AM to Fri, Sep 18, 6:00 PM
- Announcement (Stage 1 success) for Comprehensive Student Record Screening
- Fri, Nov 20 at 2:00 PM
- Level 2 exclusive fee payment deadline (critical “don’t miss”)
- Pay between:
- after the announcement of Stage 1 successful candidates
- until Mon, Nov 23 at 14:00
- If not paid by then, applicants lose eligibility to take Stage 2
- Pay between:
- Interview dates (multi-day)
- Sat, Dec 5 to Sun, Dec 6, 2026
- Interview results announcement
- Fri, Dec 18 at 14:00
- Document file format rule
- Upload documents as PDFs
- Also warned: documents should be issued on/after Sep 1, 2026 (explicitly check this condition)
H) Document form clarification (school life record alternative form)
- The “alternative form for the school life record”
- Not everyone submits it
- Only applicants who do not have a school life record must fill it out
- Applicants should read precautions to ensure they do not include prohibited items in the school life record documentation.
Speakers / sources featured (as named in subtitles)
- Kim Han-jin — Admissions officer at Konkuk University (host/lead admissions officer)
- Jin Hye-jin — Student (sophomore) in the Department of Architecture, Konkuk University
- Kim Yu-gyeom — Admissions officer at Konkuk University
- Haejin Woo / Student Haejin Woo — Student referenced as preparing applicant questions (name appears in subtitles)
- “KU TV videos” — Admissions office website content (referenced as a resource)
- “K6 Student Record-Based Admission Guidebook” — Referenced guidebook (as a resource)