Video summary
MECHANIC THEORY TESTED: NEVER Flush a 180,000-MILE Transmission? Here’s What Happened
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product/Service Reviewed
A transmission service using a flush machine (plus new filter and ATF) on a high-mileage 2009 Subaru Forester automatic transmission with unknown service history.
Key Setup / Vehicle Tested
- Vehicle: 2009 Subaru Forester
- Mileage: 178,263 mi
- Symptoms before service:
- Harsh shifting
- Shuddering during upshift/downshift
- Notably 2nd gear and 3rd gear shuttering
- “Rumble” / hesitation feeling during shifts
Condition of Old Transmission Fluid (Before)
-
Fluid pulled from the pan was:
- Very dark
- Stinky
-
Pan/magnet findings:
- Metallic debris at the bottom of the pan (sparkly / copperish)
- Magnet had significant buildup
-
Filter findings:
- Mesh screen filter packed with debris/particles
- Also showed copperish metallic residue
What They Did (Service Procedure)
- Drain and remove pan/filter
- Install new filter
- Refill with compatible ATF:
- MaxLife Multi-Vehicle ATF (claimed compatible with Subaru transmission)
- Use a transmission flush machine:
- They pumped ~10 quarts through the system (after starting with ~2 quarts added to a “bone dry” pan)
- Test drive and monitor shift behavior over time
Main Features / What the Service “Does”
- Flush machine replaces old fluid by pushing new fluid through the transmission cooling circuit/system
- Combined with a filter change to remove accumulated debris
- Intended to dislodge debris/sludge and potentially clean up hydraulic/valve body behavior
Pros Observed (Post-Flush Experience)
- Initial fluid color after flush:
- “Nice and red” (returned to fresh-looking fluid)
- Driving results:
- After ~60 mi: no shuttering, no harsh shifting felt during acceleration tests
- Later up to ~130+ mi: shifting remained smooth in stop-and-go, highway, and harder acceleration trials
- At 137.6 miles total: specifically reported
- No more 2→3 shuttering
- No slipping noticed during the test period
- Smell:
- Burnt smell reduced/changed after service
Cons / Risks Mentioned (From People and Theory)
-
Mechanic-internet caution:
- Flushing high-mileage transmissions can dislodge debris and worsen internal wear.
-
Theory of potential harm:
- Debris could affect friction material or valve body tolerances
- Could cause slippage or harsh/erratic shifts
-
Explicit disagreement shown:
- Some pros: flushing can make symptoms more pronounced if damage already exists
- Others: flushing may be a good starting point, especially when fluid is overdue
Comparisons / Opinions Included
“Don’t flush, drain & refill” camp
- Multiple comments/shops advise:
- Avoid flushes on high mileage
- Prefer drain + refill to reduce risk of dislodging sludge too aggressively
- Logic: if it fails after a flush, it may be on the way out already—but flushing could still be the trigger.
Professional shop viewpoints (called during video)
-
Shop A (advising against flush):
- If fluid is discolored and there’s a shiftability problem, fresh fluid likely won’t fix it
- It can make the issue more pronounced
- Cautions about wasting $200–$300 on fluid with no resolve
-
Shop B (supporting flush as a starting point):
- “We flush lots of transmissions all the time.”
- Since service is overdue, flush can be a reasonable starting point
- Some cases may require a double flush (example: a 2010 GMC needed two flushes)
Numerical / Rating Info
- No star ratings or formal scores.
- Quantities/timeline used:
- 178,263 mi starting mileage
- Flush machine: ~10 quarts exchanged (plus ~2 quarts pre-fill)
- Test mileage after service: ~60 mi, then ~130+ mi, ending at 137.6 miles
- No reliability guarantee; outcome is “so far.”
Unique Points Mentioned (All)
- Dark, stinky fluid + shift/shutter symptoms suggest internal wear
- Flush theory: dislodges debris and can loosen/affect friction/valve body behavior
- Symptoms were most noticeable in 2nd and 3rd gear
- Internet advice often says don’t flush, use drain & refill instead
- Shop A: damage likely already exists; flush may worsen issues; cautions about wasted money ($200–$300 estimate)
- Shop B: flushing is commonly done; overdue fluid can justify flushing; sometimes needs double flush
- Pan/magnet: heavy debris buildup and metallic residue observed
- Filter: significant debris and copperish metallic residue noted
- Valve body/solenoids looked “good” during inspection
- After flush: fluid looks red; smell improves
- Driving test: shuttering/hard shifting stops initially and remains absent during the test window
- Fluid on dipstick becomes darker quickly (expected since not all contaminants removed; only 12 quarts flushed so far)
- Conclusion: in this case, flush improved shift quality; time will tell; flush is not ideal when transmission is already severely failing (slipping/no engagement)
Overall Verdict / Recommendation
In this one high-mileage Subaru case, the flush + new filter improved shifting and did not immediately cause slipping or harsher behavior across 137.6 miles of testing.
However, the video frames this as a high-stakes gamble: if a transmission is already catastrophically failing, flushing is likely just wasting money, and many pros still prefer drain & refill over a full flush.
Recommendation based on video content:
- If symptoms resemble shuddering/harsh shifting with overdue dirty fluid and you can service with new filter + compatible ATF, a flush may be worth trying—but it’s not universally safe, and results may vary over time.
Speaker/Role Differences
- Video narrator/installer/mechanic: conducted the inspection and flush test; reported results and theory; framed it as a “debunk test.”
- Professional Shop A (called): strongly discourages flushing; believes damage already occurred and flushing may worsen issues.
- Professional Shop B (called): supports flushing as a reasonable starting point when fluid is overdue; notes some cases might require double flushing.