The plagues of Revelation?! History? Future? or Both: a rerun of the plagues of Revelation??

Main Ideas, Concepts, and Lessons

• Sin is not removed just because the New Jerusalem arrives

  • The speaker argues that evidence of sin remains in the same world/location as the New Jerusalem.
  • They interpret Revelation 21–22 as describing conditions around the city, not an instant moral purification of the entire surrounding earth.

• Revelation 21:4 is not “the end” of Revelation’s message

  • The speaker claims many people stop at Revelation 21:4 (“no more death, mourning, crying, pain”) and do not read the rest.
  • They argue that reading into Revelation 21–22 shows this promise is specific to the city, not universal for the whole planet.

• Christ’s reign includes judgment/force, not only peace

  • The speaker emphasizes that where Christ’s reign is described, it includes language like:
    • ruling “with a rod of iron”
    • breaking into pieces
    • treading/acting with “rage and anger”
  • They frame Revelation as a conflict between good and evil, even under Christ’s reign.

• Two-group model around the New Jerusalem

  • The speaker interprets Revelation 21:24–26 (and surrounding verses) as showing:
    • the New Jerusalem is a specific city on earth
    • nations/peoples exist around it in two categories:
      1. Nations/peoples who worship God (saved)
      2. Nations/peoples who do not (unsaved)
  • Those who are saved walk in God’s light, and their kings bring “glory and honor” to the city.
  • Those who are not saved remain outside the city/light.

• Sin persists outside the city; “outer darkness”

  • The speaker points to:
    • Revelation 22:27 as evidence sin exists in the same world as the New Jerusalem (as claimed by the speaker)
    • Revelation 22:15 as listing those excluded from God’s city/light (e.g., “dogs… sorcerers… murderers… idolaters… all who love and practice unrighteousness”)
  • Those excluded are described elsewhere as living in “outer darkness.”

• OT prophecies portray an earth-era with worship requirements and punishments

  • Using Zechariah 14 and Isaiah 65, the speaker argues that:
    • nations left after judgment still have duties such as yearly worship and keeping the Feast of Tabernacles
    • refusal brings consequences, including:
      • no rain for failing to come
      • “punishment” from the Lord
  • They link this idea of punishment for disobedience to Revelation’s warnings.

• Even the “new heavens and new earth” still involve childbirth and death, plus sinners

  • From Isaiah 65:17–21, the speaker highlights:
    • births continue (“children are born as before”)
    • people die (including children dying)
    • sinners exist and are “cursed”
    • longevity is described (e.g., a child dying age of 100), implying death still remains

• Revelation’s final warnings imply severe consequences for tampering

  • The speaker emphasizes Revelation 22:19:
    • if anyone takes away from the words of the prophecy, God removes a person’s portion from the book of life and from the holy city
  • They argue that “taking away from the holy city” makes sense only if the holy city is on earth during the relevant period—therefore tampering with Revelation brings earthly punishment.
  • They also highlight Revelation 22:18:
    • if anyone adds to Revelation, God adds the plagues written in it.

• Use of the Geneva Bible timeline to claim historical “repetition”

  • The speaker says they consulted the Geneva Bible (1599 edition) and its historical notes between Jude and Revelation.
  • They claim the dates in those notes reveal a pattern of repeated cycles (described as “jumping back and forth” in Revelation’s narrative).
  • Specific timeline claims (approximate, as spoken):
    • a “dragon bound for 1,000 years”
    • beasts released “immediately after”
    • time markers around 50 AD, 97 AD, 1073 AD, 1217 AD, 1295 AD, 70 AD (as a comparison), and 1303/1305 AD
    • Revelation 22 interpreted as the church’s “full glorification” in heaven after Satan’s “short time,” placed around 1300 AD
    • an assertion that from ~1303 to ~1599 AD there are “no further changes” in that narrative
  • The speaker further asserts that in their modern era, they see signs punishments described in Revelation may be occurring again.

• Application to present-day world events

  • The speaker argues Christianity has been shaped by false historical narratives that alter Revelation’s meaning, specifically claiming the belief has shifted so Christ’s return is seen only as distant.
  • They propose a speculative possibility:
    • God may be subjecting the world again to Revelation’s punishments
    • this could imply another “great disaster” and perhaps another “salvation”
  • They close with an observation about human temptation to “escape to the mountains” (alluding to end-times behavior).

---

Methodology / Instruction-Like Structure (as Presented)

1. Start from Revelation’s “peace” verse

   • Treat Revelation 21:4 (“no death, mourning, crying, pain”) as a key verse—but not the full conclusion.

2. Continue reading into Revelation 21–22

   • Use Revelation 21–22 to determine where “no death/sorrow/pain” applies (speaker’s claim: to the city, not the entire world).

3. Use “city vs. outside” distinctions

   • Identify the city’s boundaries and conditions:
     • Inside: God’s light; the saved enter
     • Outside: exclusion lists (Revelation 22:15) and “outer darkness” language (speaker’s cross-reference)

4. Cross-check with Old Testament prophecy

   • Compare with Zechariah 14 and Isaiah 65:
     • worship practices (Feast of Tabernacles)
     • consequences (lack of rain / punishment)
     • continued existence of death and sinners in the new-earth context

5. Apply Revelation’s final warnings about modifying the text

   • Use Revelation 22:18–19 to argue:
     • adding or removing from the prophecy triggers “plagues/punishment”
     • “taking away a portion from the holy city” implies the holy city is on earth during the relevant period

6. Interpret Revelation via an external historical timeline

   • Consult the Geneva Bible (1599) historical notes for chronology.
   • Claim Revelation’s events align with that chronology in repeating patterns.

7. Conclude with a present-day relevance claim

   • Use observed world events to suggest they may correspond to Revelation’s punishments.
   • End with uncertainty but a warning/question about whether another great disaster is coming.

---

Speakers / Sources Featured

Speakers

• Unidentified speaker/author (a single person who speaks throughout)

Sources Referenced

Bible books/verses

• Revelation: 2, 9, 19, 20, 21, 22
• Zechariah 14
• Isaiah 65
• General references to “other places in the Bible” and “Prophecy of this book”

Non-biblical references

• Geneva Bible (1599 edition) (historical notes used)
• “Passion of Christ” (mentioned as a reference for calculating/relating time markers; context suggests a source text/chronology)
• Cultural references (not authoritative sources, but mentioned): “Narnia,” “movies,” and “Monti” (as part of a description of carvings/drawings)