Конец Зленского. Что ожидает Украину и Россию?

Overview

The speaker (Valery Morozov) frames the war and political situation as part of an impending leadership transition in Ukraine and Russia. He argues that Zelensky’s governing group “must leave power.” In his view, this shift is driven primarily by political decisions made with involvement of the United States and Russia (and indirectly Europe), rather than by purely military logic.

Key Claims and Analysis

Zelensky’s removal is seen as inevitable

• The speaker says the issue is not just Zelensky personally, but changing the regime in Kyiv.
• He suggests Western and intelligence-linked actors are coordinating with Russia to force an end-state that requires Zelensky’s fall.
• He characterizes this as a foregone conclusion: “the game is over” for Zelensky’s current role.

Military pressure is portrayed as politically timed

• He argues that Russia’s intensification of strikes against Ukraine (including Western Ukraine) is politically decided, not accidental.
• He highlights new delivery systems—especially drones and Korean-made missiles—as tools enabling deeper strikes.
• He suggests these tools could be used against hard infrastructure (including bridges and other large targets).

North Korea’s missile capabilities support the timing argument

• The speaker claims North Korea is fielding “more than a hundred” powerful missiles with very large warheads.
• He argues Russia is positioning these for use.
• He interprets this as evidence that escalation is linked to a political timetable tied to leadership changes.

Speculation about post-war structure: “economic zone / buffer zones”

• He repeatedly returns to creating a separate economic-admin-financial “zone” (using terms such as “buffer zone” and a “community” model).
• He suggests Odessa could remain legally part of Ukraine but be placed into a special zone managed jointly by multinational/transnational structures.
• He states that participation could include Europe/USA and Russia (and he adds that China and India could join).
• He argues that if negotiations and governance arrangements are swift and effective, the city/zone might remain within Ukraine; otherwise Russia could incorporate more territory through political force.

U.S./Europe domestic politics as a deadline

• He predicts the conflict will not last long, proposing an end timeline around October/early November.
• He ties this to the U.S. political calendar (including elections and expected congressional decisions).
• He expects “decisions,” strikes/actions, and political outcomes to be completed before those election milestones.

Technology and war economics

• He claims a conventional continuation of war is becoming “technologically unprofitable,” due to changing offensive/defensive balances and rising costs.
• He comments on “unmanned systems,” and suggests the West may discuss or demand training/testing.
• He also notes nuclear-threat scenarios might be raised, while stating he believes real nuclear use is unlikely.

Broader narrative: elite manipulation and intelligence operations

• The speaker advances a general theory that political conflicts may be staged or used as instruments.
• He argues intelligence services, corruption networks, and elite rivalries drive events.
• He uses long personal anecdotes to support his credibility and to illustrate Kremlin/FSB-style power dynamics and information manipulation.

Personal background and credibility claims

• He recounts alleged Soviet-era and Kremlin-era connections.
• He describes later conflicts he associates with Olympic construction corruption scandals (as he frames them).
• He states he later moved to the UK under political asylum.
• He uses these stories to argue he has inside knowledge of Kremlin mechanisms and that the current war leadership conflict flows through an internal-to-external intelligence/political pipeline.

Present-Day “Bottom Line” Position

• Zelensky’s regime must be removed.
• Russia will continue intensified strikes using drones/missiles, but the endgame is political system change.
• A likely settlement concept involves special zones along borders and possibly Odessa, governed under a separate economic framework with international participation—rather than a straightforward territorial end.

Presenter(s) / Contributor(s)

• Valery Morozov — main speaker/host; conducts the session and answers questions.