Video summary
Mechanic Inspects the Foton Tunland V9 - This Was Not What We Expected!
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product reviewed
Foton Tunland V9S (marketed as V9S / Foton V9S), inspected on a hoist by a mechanic. The video emphasizes under-bonnet and underbody build details, then compares towing capability and power specs against other vehicles.
Key features mentioned
Model difference (V9 vs V9S)
- The only stated difference is that the V9S includes a sunroof.
- The sunroof is described as “humongous.”
Engine / powertrain (top-side inspection)
- 2.0L diesel
- 48-volt hybrid system
Engine bay packaging & serviceability
- “Huge” / very spacious engine bay
- Easy access for maintenance tasks (example: replacing a drive belt)
- Water-cooled intercooler with an electronic water pump for intercooler circulation
- Components called out in the bay:
- Fuel filter in the engine bay
- Battery
- Coolant overflow(s)
- Brake fluid reservoir
- Air filter
- DPF-related components
Underbody / emissions system
- AdBlue tank under the car (the speaker later questions the emissions hardware amount)
- DPF + catalytic converter + AdBlue mentioned together as “a lot” of emissions systems
Drivetrain / hardware (underbody inspection)
- ZF 8-speed transmission
- Described as popular across Chinese vehicles
- BorgWarner transfer case
- Front drivetrain elements noted:
- Front diff / drive shaft
- CV shafts
Cooling / comfort-related undercarriage details
- Rubber engine mounts (preferred over oil-filled mounts)
- Electronic steering rack pump
- Coil springs used on both front and rear
- Highlighted for comfort and potential lift-kit compatibility
Performance / capability claims (numbers included)
- Power: 120 kW
- Torque: 450 Nm
Comparison to other models
- 120 kW vs GWM Cannon (2021):
- The speaker argues the Cannon’s 120 kW is not underpowered, despite some people claiming it was.
Towing capability & GCM
- Towing capacity: 3.5 ton
- GCM (gross combined mass): 6.8 tons / 6,810 kg
- Toyota Hilux comparison: Hilux GCM: 6.3 tons
- Conclusion: suitable for heavy caravan towing while staying legal, with a caveat to check your own weights.
User experience / usability impressions
- Maintenance friendliness: Strong positive—engine bay access is described as excellent and tidy/organized.
- Comfort: The speaker strongly implies comfort benefits from the coil-sprung suspension.
- Aftermarket support:
- Positive expectation for lift kits (“somebody will start making lift kits…”).
- Concern: limited tow bar and accessory availability right now (“only drama at the moment”).
Pros (unique points called out)
- Very spacious engine bay and excellent routine-work access (e.g., drive belt access)
- Water-cooled intercooler described as neat/simple
- Fuel filter located in the engine bay, called unusual among Chinese manufacturers
- 48V hybrid alternator design discussed as unusual but functional (aimed at economy/power)
- Clean underbody / rust prevention
- Appreciates the lack of “computery crap hanging below” compared with some other vehicles
- Transmission & transfer case brands called out
- ZF 8-speed
- BorgWarner transfer case
- Underbody looks well assembled
- Tidy welds and clean packaging
- Rubber engine mounts (preferred over oil-filled mounts)
- Coil springs front and rear
- Comfort emphasis
- Easier lift-kit potential
- Braking setup
- Disc brakes front and rear
- Rear uses electronic park brake (called a good setup)
- Inner guard liner removal via screws (not clips), praised for accessory installs like a snorkel
- Wheel nut covers dislike (user note)
- Not a vehicle feature per se, but the speaker explicitly prefers the traditional wheel nut approach over covers
Cons / criticisms (unique points called out)
- Emissions hardware complexity
- Not impressed by DPF + catalytic converter + AdBlue together (“a lot”)
- Heavy “greasy/overspray” smearing on the underbody
- Thick sprayed material noted; concern about where it goes when hot
- Spare tire tread mismatch
- Same size, but spare has a different tread pattern than the standard all-terrains
- Aftermarket tow bar availability
- Wants a tow bar but expects it to be difficult to find/fit accessories currently
Comparisons made with similar products
- GWM Cannon (2021)
- 120 kW comparison; speaker argues Cannon’s 120 kW is not underpowered
- Toyota Hilux
- Hilux GCM: 6.3 tons vs Foton 6.8 tons
- Foton presented as stronger for heavy towing legality margins
- Other Chinese vehicles (general theme)
- Many are said to place fuel filters underneath (more prone to damage); this Foton is praised for keeping it in the engine bay
- ZF and BorgWarner components are said to show up frequently across Chinese vehicles
Unique points specifically about the V9S branding/exterior preview
- Headlight style differs between V9 and V7
- Referenced via another person’s explanation (acknowledged as possibly second-hand)
- Exterior details mentioned:
- 18-inch wheels
- Powder-coated side steps
- “Humongous sports bar”
- Big “4x4” decal
- A promised walkthrough of the interior/exterior comes later (outside this hoist inspection segment).
Overall verdict / recommendation (based on the video)
The reviewer is leaning positive. Standout strengths include:
- Engine packaging
- Build quality tidiness
- Underbody protection
- Suspension comfort (coil springs)
- Towing legality potential (3.5t towing + 6.8t GCM)
Main drawbacks:
- Emissions system complexity (DPF/AdBlue)
- Heavy underbody sprayed material
- Spare tread mismatch
- Limited tow bar/accessory availability
Recommendation: Worth considering, particularly if you prioritize maintenance access and heavy towing—but check emissions and aftermarket tow-bar options before buying.
Speaker(s)
- Primary mechanic/host (Wheels by the Ocean)
- Provides nearly all technical observations: engine bay, underbody, brakes, transmission/transfer case, hybrid architecture, and suspension
- Makes performance/towing comparisons using:
- 120 kW, 450 Nm
- 3.5t towing, 6.8t GCM vs Hilux 6.3t
- Cannon comparison
- Also shares subjective judgments on build quality, comfort, and emissions hardware impressions