ПОЛНАЯ ВЕРСИЯ. Третья тайна Фатимы. Александр Артамонов

Summary of the video (subtitles auto-translated)

Alexander Artamonov presents himself as a military and international observer and a NATO specialist. He frames the end of 2022—and the continuing events of 2022–2023—as part of a long historical process. In his view, world change is achieved through suffering and conflict rather than through peaceful, gradual reform.

He argues that Russia regained sovereignty after decades of losing it since 1991. He also interprets the ongoing war as a necessary phase to “clean out” internal enemies (a “fifth column”) and rebuild the economy away from Western-influenced financial “bubbles.”

Artamonov further predicts that a new elite will emerge from front-line experience and then control major state institutions—especially defense and other government structures—ensuring the “old world” moves farther away with no return.

From there, the talk shifts from war and politics to the Vatican. He describes it as historically influential and intellectually rich, but also ambiguous, with “secrets” that are carefully concealed. His central theme becomes the “Third Secret of Fatima.”

---

Fatima “Third Secret” (core argument)

• He recalls the Fatima apparitions (May 13, 1917), involving children and the claim that the Virgin Mary made three predictions.
• He states that two prophecies are known, while the third is not officially published, though it is widely discussed in narratives circulating among believers.
• Artamonov rejects mainstream Vatican-linked claims—such as the idea that John Paul II supposedly published or revealed the real third secret—arguing these are inaccurate or misleading.
• He claims the third secret is connected with Russia’s role, specifically that Russia would “save the world.”
• He argues that John Paul II’s act of dedicating Russia to the Mother of God (which Artamonov says took place shortly before the Soviet Union’s collapse) supports a cause-and-effect interpretation—while noting that skeptics may reject this.
• He concludes that revealing the third secret is intended to encourage hope for 2023, portraying the Vatican as a long-time holder of world-historical guidance, even if it keeps it from full public release.

---

Additional claims about Vatican “science” and hidden knowledge

Artamonov presents a series of “facts” related to the Vatican, including:

• Vatican acknowledgment that other intelligent life could exist (citing the Vatican Observatory and Father José Gabriel Funes).
• A shift away from strict anthropocentrism, referencing admissions by popes related to Copernicus and heliocentrism.
• Claims that major libraries and archives exist but are largely inaccessible, including detailed assertions about:
  • very large total lengths of shelving,
  • tens of thousands of books and manuscripts,
  • rare or even “forbidden” materials (he mentions “grimoires,” including an occult-themed collection).

He also mentions speculative or apocryphal stories such as:

• A chronovisor/time-viewing device story tied to Enrico Fermi, including claims about photographing Christ.
• Stories involving alleged diaries by Hans Nielsen describing Vatican findings that (in the narrative) challenge Christianity.

---

Vatican’s role in geopolitics and religion

Artamonov describes the Vatican as active in international matters:

• He discusses the Holy Land (Bethlehem/Jerusalem), Vatican cooperation involving Israel and the Palestinian Authority, and Vatican involvement in Middle East religious-political dynamics.
• He argues the Vatican’s posture is not purely destructive; sometimes it is “constructive.”
• He advances a broader claim that Vatican strategy in Europe may differ from America’s—portraying the Vatican as aiming for Europe’s gradual absorption into Catholic structures, while Americans pursue Europe’s destruction or weakening.
• He cites examples tied to Orthodox–Catholic relations (including references in the subtitles to “Joseph Ranger,” corresponding to Joseph Ratzinger / Pope Joseph Ratzinger) to argue that rapprochement efforts were being reversed for political ends.

Artamonov returns to his earlier theme: engaging the Vatican in negotiation is risky because it may lead to contradictory positions and political “quagmires.” He ends by wishing viewers well, advising them not to overfocus on omens, while still acknowledging faith and knowledge.

---

Presenters or contributors

• Alexander Artamonov — main presenter (described as an international military observer, NATO specialist)