Video summary
Comprehensive Foot and Ankle Examination
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas and lessons (comprehensive foot/ankle exam workflow)
The presenter emphasizes that the foot and ankle exam is complex (roughly 26 bones and ~33 joints), and can feel daunting—especially in settings where foot/ankle subspecialty training is limited.
They propose a practical, repeatable structure:
- Good exposure (see the knees and feet/ankles; ideally topless to also examine the back)
- Footwear assessment first (to infer biomechanical problems and deformities)
- Gait assessment (pattern recognition of common gait abnormalities)
- Inspection from multiple views (front, side, back): alignment, muscle wasting, scars, and toe/forefoot deformities
- Inspect the plantar surface (“sole mirror”) for callosities and abnormal pressure distribution
- Palpation in a systematic order
- Pulses
- Sensation
- Then structured tenderness by anatomic region
- Range of motion (ROM)
- Active first, then passive using joint-locking positions to isolate joints
- Muscle/tendon function testing (using positions to isolate specific tendons)
- Special tests to confirm or differentiate key diagnoses
Methodology / step-by-step instruction
1) Exposure / setup
- Have the patient wear shorts so that knees and feet/ankles are visible.
- Prefer the patient is topless so you can examine the back (back pathology can contribute to foot/ankle deformity/disease).
- Ensure you can see both knees and both feet, and examine the back as well.
2) First step: footwear examination (before physical foot exam)
Assess whether footwear is:
- Custom-made vs ready-made
Then evaluate:
- Shoe type
- Inside sole/insole and any modifications
- Shoe bottom wear pattern
Use wear patterns as biomechanical clues:
- Cavus foot → increased wear on the outside
- Planus/overpronation → inside wear; external border may be relatively spared
- Conus / contracture-type heel not landing → more wear at the front
- Calcaneus → more wear at the heel region
- Hallux valgus with specific shoe wear → indirect evidence for why the deformity happened (deformity + wear pattern context)
Key lesson: footwear provides diagnostic biomechanical hints—inspect it carefully first.
3) Gait assessment
- Ask the patient to walk.
- Assess:
- Is gait normal?
- Foot progression angle (foot path relative to midline)
- Typical: slight external rotation (near “neutral” progression)
- Negative foot progression angle suggests rotational abnormality (e.g., posterior/femoral contributors)
- Heel strike
- Flat feet
- Toe-off adequacy
- Recognize gait patterns:
- Antalgic gait: decreased stance time/stride length; avoids weight-bearing on the painful side
- Foot drop gait: “slap” as the foot hits ground due to poor dorsiflexion
- Reduced toe-off: e.g., hallux rigidus/big toe arthritis → decreased toe-off and altered gait
4) Inspection (front → side → back)
A) From the front
- Check coronal malalignment (patient stands straight; observe heel/knee alignment).
- Evaluate knees:
- excessive valgus or varus can alter foot biomechanics
- Assess rotational profile of both limbs.
- Look for:
- muscle wasting
- deformities
- scars from previous surgery
- Forefoot/hindfoot visual cues:
- Too much heel visibility suggests varus deformity (“positive peek-a-boo sign”).
- Estimate arch visually:
- Rough criterion described: index finger should pass under the arch without touching
- Assess both sides.
B) From the side
- Look for muscle wasting:
- thigh, calf, and anterior compartment
- Check:
- lateral fullness
- scars/incisions
- Arch assessment:
- If arch appears flat, do a Jack test
- Dorsiflex the big toe → observe whether the arch reconstitutes
- Flexible flatfoot: arch forms on toe dorsiflexion
- If arch appears flat, do a Jack test
C) From the back
- First ensure there’s no abnormality in the back, since foot/ankle deformity may originate there.
- Inspect for:
- calf wasting
- rotational deformity
- hindfoot alignment
- Normal described as slight valgus (~5° referenced)
- “Coming together” / too much inversion suggests slight varus
- Toe visibility from back:
- Normally about one and a half toes
- If more: sign of planus/valgus and possible posterior dysfunction implication
- Tiptoe assessment:
- Alignment can change on tiptoe (presenter notes varus correcting on tiptoe)
5) Forefoot toe inspection
Inspect for:
- Bunion / hallux valgus
- Hallux varus / helix varus (as described)
- Callosities on pressure points
- Lesser toe deformities:
- Hammer toe: PIP flexed, MCP slightly extended, DIP slightly extended (only PIP flexed)
- Claw toe: MCP hyperextension + proximal and distal IP flexion patterns
- Mallet toe: MCP and PIP near normal, DIP slightly flexed
- Inspect between toes:
- fungal infection
- skin abnormalities (speaker mentions melanoma/“Nevis”)
6) Sole/palm inspection (pressure distribution)
Use the principle:
“Sole is the mirror of your foot.”
Normal weightbearing described as a tripod:
- calcaneus (heel)
- 1st metatarsal
- 5th metatarsal
Abnormal pattern:
- Shifting toward lesser metatarsals → callosities
Example:
- Callosity under the 2nd–3rd toe area (classically around the 2nd metatarsal) suggests transverse metatarsalgia.
7) Palpation (feel part) + vascular + sensation before deep palpation
A) Pulses
- Dorsalis pedis:
- lateral to extensor hallucis tendon
- between the 1st and 2nd metatarsal areas
- Posterior tibial:
- behind the medial malleolus
B) Sensation check (rough)
- Superficial peroneal nerve (between first webspace)
- Deep peroneal nerve
- Tibial (medial plantar), plantar branches, and lateral plantar
- Sural nerve (outer aspect)
C) Systematic palpation by region
General approach: start posterior, then move systematically.
Posterior and heel-related targets:
- Achilles tendon
- Feel for gap in injury (gap about an inch above insertion)
- Insertional vs non-insertional tendinitis clues:
- bump above insertion → non-insertional
- lateral bump/tenderness → insertional
- Retrocalcaneal bursa
- Haglund’s deformity
- lateral calcaneal tuberosity tenderness
- “Impingement” area
- tenderness in certain athletes (e.g., footballers/ballet dancers)
- pain reduced with dorsiflexion performed to unload the impingement
Key medial side palpation:
- Medial malleolus tenderness
- Deltoid ligament tenderness
- Plantar fascia insertion tenderness → plantar fasciitis
- Posterior tibial tendon:
- pain/fullness/tenderness → tibialis posterior dysfunction
- Flexor hallucis longus synovitis clue:
- toe plantarflexion OK, but dorsiflexion reproduces pain/restriction
- Tarsal tunnel syndrome suspicion area:
- tingling or symptom reproduction when pressing behind medial malleolus (special tests follow later)
Anterior ankle palpation:
- Anterior ankle and medial/lateral gutters
- suggests arthritis or osteochondral injury (talar dome)
- Fullness
- may suggest synovitis/inflammatory pathology
Lateral ankle palpation:
- Lateral malleolus tenderness
- Lateral ligament complex:
- ATFL
- CFL
- PTFL
- Peroneal tendons
- tenderness → tendinitis
- Sinus tarsi tenderness
- can indicate joint pain
- Calcaneus squeeze test
- pain may suggest calcaneal insufficiency/fracture
Midfoot palpation:
- Talonavicular joint / accessory navicular
- bump and pain
- Tarsal joints and individual tenderness by joint/metatarsal region
- Principle: pinpoint tenderness helps localize pathology.
8) Range of motion (active then passive)
A) Active movement (approximate degrees given)
- Ankle:
- dorsiflexion ~20°
- plantarflexion ~40°
- Inversion ~20°
- Eversion ~10°
B) Passive movement (positioning to isolate joints)
- Dorsiflexion purely at ankle:
- position to “lock” other joints
- assess ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion without subtalar/shockpart motion confounding results
- Subtalar joint movement:
- immobilize talus (thumb in front of talar neck)
- gentle inversion/eversion about ~5° each direction
- Inversion/eversion as complex:
- inversion involves subtalar + Chopart-region contributions
- Forefoot movement:
- immobilize midfoot to isolate transverse tarsal contribution
- Hallux movement:
- cited generally: dorsiflexion ~80–90°; plantarflexion ~20–30°
(ROM assessment of the full foot/ankle is completed after these components.)
9) Muscle/tendon function testing (isolate tendons via specific foot positions)
- Extensor hallucis / tibialis anterior
- foot neutral (~90°) with slight inversion to isolate tibialis anterior
- ask patient to lift/dorsiflex against resistance; palpate tendon
- Tibialis posterior tendon
- plantarflexion + slight inversion
- ask patient to resist; palpate posterior tibialis tendon
- Peroneus longus
- slight plantarflexion + slight inversion; palpate
- Peroneus brevis
- neutral position (~90° described); palpate behind lateral malleolus region
Emphasis: maintain the described foot positions so tendons are truly isolated.
Special tests (diagnostic differentiation)
1) Tarsal tunnel syndrome
- Tinel’s/tap test
- tapping reproduces burning pain/paresthesia → positive
- Compression test
- compressing reduces symptoms → positive
- Nerve stretch + compression
- evert foot slightly (stretch nerve), then compress; symptom reduction → positive
2) Morton’s neuroma
- Suspected space: 3rd–4th webspace (sometimes 2nd–3rd)
- Compression test
- compress between metatarsal heads (dorsal-to-plantar) → burning pain reproduced → positive
- Click/reproduction maneuvers
- press medial-lateral to provoke a click → positive
- described technique for 3rd/4th space involves pushing “sides” and listening/feeling for a click
3) Silverskiold test (gastroc vs soleus tightness)
- If both gastroc and soleus tight:
- dorsiflexion restricted at knee flexion (90°) and knee extension
- If isolated gastroc tightness:
- dorsiflexion limited in knee extension
- dorsiflexion improves with knee flexed
4) Thompson test (Achilles rupture/disruption)
- Compare both sides visually.
- Then:
- squeeze the calf (“squeeze the car”)
- observe dorsiflexion response
- compare to the other side
- Positive:
- less dorsiflexion or no movement compared to the other side → suggests Achilles discontinuity
5) Peroneal tendon subluxation/disruption (ankle sprain context)
- After ankle sprain, consider possible disruption of superior peroneal retinaculum/tendon control.
- Test:
- ask patient to evert/invert while feeling for tendon “popping”
- Positive:
- tendon subluxates/pops as it moves
6) First MTP joint disorders (hallux valgus/rigidus)
- Hallux valgus: bunion on medial aspect
- Hallux rigidus:
- bony swelling dorsally
- dorsal bump on side view
- pressing reproduces tenderness
- Grind test
- “grind s”: grind 1st MTP joint surfaces together
- crepitus or pain reproduction → positive
- ROM clue:
- hallux rigidus shows loss of dorsiflexion and painful motion
- Flexible vs rigid evaluation (hallux varus/valgus concept):
- if deformity corrects passively → suggests less need for certain surgical release steps (presenter’s implication)
7) “Squeeze test” for syndesmotic injury / ankle fracture
- Squeeze tibia and fibula together (proximal leg compression).
- Positive:
- pain felt down at ankle region → “definite F sign” → suggests ankle fracture or syndesmotic injury
8) Anterior drawer test (ATFL insufficiency/instability)
- Stabilize the leg; hold heel/calcaneus.
- Translate talus anteriorly relative to tibia.
- Compare with the normal side.
- Positive:
- soft/loose endpoint or excessive translation compared with other side → ATFL deficiency/insufficiency
9) Tibialis posterior dysfunction assessment
- Screening signs:
- “too many toes” sign (> ~1.5 toes visible from behind)
- excessive heel valgus
- Single heel raise vs double heel raise
- indicates whether the deformity is correctable
- if heels come together/correct → suggests posterior tibialis function is preserved
- Strength specificity:
- do unilateral heel raise assessment on affected side
- if deformity corrects there → flexible/potentially less advanced dysfunction
- Coleman block test (for cavus-related deformity flexibility)
- patient stands on block at edge:
- lateral forefoot on block
- medial side off block
- observe hindfoot alignment from behind toward neutral
- if alignment improves → deformity is flexible; helps assess fixed vs flexible contributions
- used to inform surgical planning
- patient stands on block at edge:
Conclusion / stated purpose
The presenter frames the video as a comprehensive demonstration covering:
- inspection
- palpation
- ROM
- tendon function testing
- special tests
Goal: help viewers become more comfortable performing foot/ankle exams and recognizing pathology patterns.
Speakers / sources featured
- Primary speaker/presenter: unnamed clinician demonstrating the foot and ankle examination (mentions asking a resident named Akash for clinical demonstrations).
- Other person(s) featured:
- Akash (resident/volunteer used for walking and clinical demonstrations).
- Sources cited: no external studies or named guidelines are cited in the subtitles.
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.