তাহসিফ হত্যাকাণ্ড দিপকে টোপ হিসাবে ব্যবহার করেছে যে ? Pinaki Bhattacharya || The Untold

Summary

Pinaki Bhattacharya argues that the circumstances surrounding Air Force Flight Lieutenant KM Tahsif Sawri’s death are being obscured by a series of conflicting accounts. He says statements from police, the PBI, military sources, witnesses, and media have shifted over several days, and suggests that the changing explanations may be intended to divert attention from the circumstances of the death. These are the presenter’s allegations and interpretations, not established findings.

Accounts of Tahsif’s military service and dismissal

Bhattacharya focuses on a source whose social-media posts reportedly changed their account of Tahsif’s military service and dismissal. An earlier post placed Tahsif among Air Force officers linked to an alleged espionage case involving a squadron leader. Later posts described his dismissal first as a disciplinary matter and then as an incident involving alleged “immoral activities” in an aircraft hangar.

Bhattacharya says these versions do not fit together. He also cites a purported internal Air Force document that gives “immoral activities” as the reason for Tahsif’s dismissal, and questions whether the dismissal followed a court martial or an administrative process. His reading of the relevant laws, he says, raises further questions about reports of a ten-year sentence and how the alleged offences were classified.

Changing accounts of the night Tahsif died

The presenter examines the changing accounts given by Deep, described as the only witness to the hours between Tahsif leaving his apartment and his body being found. CCTV reportedly shows the two men leaving separately at about 6:31 p.m.

As Bhattacharya recounts it, Deep’s first account was that they met later, dealt with a broken motorcycle, and ate together before parting around midnight. Later, Deep reportedly said Tahsif jumped into a river while fleeing police in Tongi at around 2 a.m. Bhattacharya says the location and details shifted again when Deep was taken to the scene. He contrasts these accounts with a doorman’s report that Deep returned home alone at about 2:30 a.m. and appeared calm.

Unresolved questions and evidence

Other unresolved questions include why Tahsif’s motorcycle had no number plate, where Deep’s motorcycle was, and why only one of the two bikes seen on CCTV was reportedly found. Bhattacharya says Deep led investigators to a motorcycle near the river. He questions how the police could be linked to a chase when the local police-station officer reportedly said he had only heard about it and did not know which team was involved.

Bhattacharya also criticizes the early emphasis on whether drugs were involved, arguing that it could shift suspicion onto the deceased before the facts are established.

He points to Tahsif’s reported connection with Netra News and a message in which Tahsif allegedly warned that something was wrong and asked others to keep track of him. Bhattacharya speculates that this connection may make the case politically sensitive. He further alleges that Deep may have been used as “bait” and that people responsible for the death are being protected; the subtitles provide no independent evidence establishing those claims.

The presenter says the key evidence is in the state’s possession. He calls for investigators to examine:

• Tongi West Police Station’s duty and patrol records
• Deep’s and Tahsif’s phone-location and call data
• The final activity and location of Tahsif’s iPhone

He argues that these records could clarify where Tahsif was during the missing hours and whom he last contacted. He ends by expressing pessimism that the case will be solved and calling for justice for Tahsif.

Presenter/contributor

• Pinaki Bhattacharya