Video summary
01直播LIVE|2026-07-14 DSE放榜2026.直播|今屆有無終極狀元?狀元及超級狀元數目揭曉|01新聞|DSE放榜|文憑試|放榜
Main summary
Key takeaways
Overview
The video is a live press conference (01新聞) announcing results for the 2026 Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) – Liberal Arts Examination. Media briefing covered overall performance, “super achievers,” exam procedures, and detected irregularities.
Overall entry and exam scale
- Total candidature: 58,487 candidates, up by about 5.4% from the prior year.
- Registered/self-reported figures are also described as increasing (including media figures); the speaker emphasizes an overall rise.
- Performance metrics focus on the proportion meeting required levels for local degree admission.
- The overall standard/average for key indicators is described as roughly flat, with some improvement in:
- Civics and Social Development
- Citizenship-related areas
Core subject results (high-level takeaways)
Speakers said core subjects are largely stable overall, not broadly “easier” or “harder,” but with subject-specific movements:
- Mathematics (compulsory parts): grades described as rising across the board, with the proportion meeting higher attainment levels said to be steady or improved.
- Civics and Social Development: achievement rates described as up compared with last year.
- Chinese and English:
- English: appears stable
- Chinese: shows a slight decline, with speakers suggesting it may relate to student distribution/ability mix rather than a policy-driven change.
- Applied learning / other categories: reported as around the same / slightly flat, with specific attainment proportions mentioned (including percentages achieving top or above-target outcomes).
“Top achievers”: number of “super/maximum” performers
The press conference uses a precise grading framework to define “super achievers” (e.g., involving five-star + additional five-star in specified components depending on the candidate path).
Reported headline figures:
- 24 candidates achieving the highest “six-five-star” definition.
- 11 candidates within that group meeting an additional “super” condition (as categorized by the speaker).
- Distribution: these candidates are said to be spread across 15 schools for the “six-five-star” group.
Examination fairness and grading methodology
The Examination and Assessment Board described:
- Multiple grading/evaluation centers (e.g., ten leveling/evaluation centers across districts).
- A network/online version for score reporting/logins (described as enabling remote access where applicable).
- A level-referenced standard:
- Cut scores are calibrated using stable historical outcomes and multiple examinations to keep results comparable across cohorts.
- A process to check “score adjustment”, so most schools remain within expected bands.
Cheating / irregularities (key reported actions)
- The board reports a higher number of detected cheating cases than the prior year, while emphasizing these remain a small proportion of all candidates.
- Zeroing actions:
- A serious case in Visual Arts coursework: the work was judged plagiarism/copying, resulting in 0 marks for that coursework and related subject outcomes.
- Violation categories mentioned included (examples):
- Uploading photos / computer barcode-related behaviors
- Mobile phone rule violations
- Other exam-environment misconduct
Key assurances emphasized:
- Strict supervision and procedural fairness.
- Cheating detection and handling follow established exam committee guidelines.
- No plan to change the overall exam location approach to the mainland (questioned by media); HK-based arrangements are described as continuing.
Candidate outcome release logistics (tomorrow)
The board explained how results will be released:
- Online availability the next day in the morning.
- A phone/portal inquiry and/or an official hotline window is mentioned.
- SMS messages will be sent to candidates.
- Weather and logistics reminders are briefly noted.
Q&A highlights from media
Difficulty adjustment
Speakers argued that exam standard is controlled through level referencing and grading calibration; fluctuations are attributed to differences in student cohorts and subject-specific factors.
AI cheating concerns / future response
They acknowledged AI-enabled cheating risks and said the board will consider expanded monitoring measures and reminders about electronic equipment and device rule compliance.
Geography controversy
A “geography” dispute was addressed:
- An issue appeared to have been detected shortly after the exam opening.
- The board said corrective action/measure was taken immediately.
- Geography results are described as not showing negative impact (even improved in some metrics).
AI in internal learning and submission
The board stated:
- AI tools may be used as learning aids.
- Within rules requiring source disclosure / AI-generation disclosure and required transparency.
- School-level supervision and documentation are emphasized.
International / China-region self-admission (GBA / non-local candidates)
Asked whether reforms changed numbers, the response emphasized that threshold requirements were not drastically changed, but year-to-year figures for different admission channels increased/shifted.
Chinese oral-related assessment change
Asked about a prior cancellation/withdrawal plan:
- Speakers said it has been running as a practice since around 2024.
- There is no short-term plan to re-cut/withdraw it.
- Support/hotline assistance is available, though uptake/complaints are described as limited so far.
Presenters / contributors
- Professor Yi-hsiung (representing the Hong Kong Municipal Assessment / Examination-related authority)
- Secretary / official from the Hong Kong Municipal Assessment Department (name unclear from subtitles)
- Mr. Shinlongshi (school flat supervisor / school-related representative)
- Aju Sin Lin (supervisor of the school city assessment)
- Miss (art/classmate representative who answered about plagiarism in Visual Arts coursework; name unclear from subtitles)
- Additional board colleagues referenced during Q&A (not clearly named in subtitles)