Video summary

Deretan Motor-motor Yang Sebaiknya Wajib DIhindari!

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Summary of the video review (motorbikes to avoid)

The video is a caution list of motorbikes the presenter says you should not buy, mainly due to high fuel consumption, weak/fragile CVT or electrical systems, expensive/rare parts, and maintenance difficulty.

Overall message: if you already own one, don’t panic—keep maintaining it or consider selling later.

Key products mentioned (and why they’re not recommended)

1) Mio Cararbu / Mio with “carburetor” (presenter mentions “Mio Carbo”)

Main issues (unique points):

  • Consumes a lot of fuel.
  • CVT is easy to break if rarely maintained, especially the recovery/related part.
  • If your goal is modification/hobby, it may be fine (it can be bored out).
  • Potential downsides of modification:
    • Carb can be bored up to ~200 cc (and possibly beyond with expert work).
    • Engine described as “full billet” (positioned as an appeal for hobby/mod culture).
  • Mentions a modified Mio 2 trend by Indonesian/Thai creators—implying it’s more of a hobby/mod bike than a practical purchase.

Pros (implied):

  • Potential for modification and performance building.

Cons (dominant):

  • High fuel use + fragile CVT when neglected.
  • Recommended mainly for hobby/modifiers, not regular owners.

2) Mio G (CVT leak + weak power + electrical annoyances)

Main issues:

  • CVT leaks repeatedly, starting early (“since the first time it was born”), especially near the pulley area.
  • Weak power, linked to being designed to be economical:
    • Prioritizes fuel efficiency over power/torque.
  • Annoying electrical problems:
    • Short circuit can cause maintenance headaches if the owner isn’t experienced.
    • Examples mentioned: bushings becoming loose/compressed, injector stuttering, etc.
  • The presenter frames weak power as normal because of the economy-focused design.

Pros (implied):

  • Better fuel economy (acknowledged indirectly as a design goal).

Cons (dominant):

  • Frequent CVT/pulley leakage
  • Weak power
  • Electrical issues become worse with poor maintenance.

3) Honda Vario Carbu (carbureted Vario Techno 110)

Main issues:

  • If the bike is already heavily used (“tortured”) or older (over ~10 years):
    • Carb-related problems can lead to issues in the CDI section.
  • Common damage areas:
    • Radiator problems (emphasized repeatedly).
    • Electrical system damage, described as fragile/abundant in components.
  • Extra frustrating items if poorly maintained:
    • Rough drivetrain behavior (described unclearly, but indicates roughness/handling annoyance).
    • Radiator maintenance is required.
    • Electrical maintenance, especially the carb choke, which can break easily.
  • Secondhand risk:
    • On average, used bikes are likely to break.
  • Expensive replacement parts, especially:
    • The radiator of the first Vario is described as a serious/heavy and costly component.
  • Final metaphor: parts are like aging/brittle bones—old age makes it worse.

Pros (conditional):

  • If condition is healthy, it can still be fun to ride.

Cons (dominant):

  • Older carbureted models become troublesome
  • Radiator + electrical are common failure points
  • Choke breaks easily
  • High cost parts + high secondhand failure probability

4) Yamaha Lexam and Honda “Trevo AT” (cub-shaped but automatic, chain final drive)

Main issues:

  • Described as unclear/strange configs:
    • Looks like a cub-style bike, but the engine is automatic.
  • Final drive uses a chain (not a typical expectation for this bike category).
  • When components fail, repairs are expensive and hard:
    • Internal parts are hard to find
    • Workarounds may exist, but not reliably
  • Extra maintenance:
    • Need to manage the chain
    • Also take care of V-belt / Vibell, implying multiple drivetrain layers prone to issues
  • Performance feel:
    • Can feel slow due to drivetrain delay/behavior (“engine delay” after drivetrain interactions).
  • Rarity problem:
    • “Rare to find spare parts,” with limited owners.

Pros (implied):

  • Possibly novelty or niche value, though negatives are the main focus.

Cons (dominant):

  • Rare parts
  • Expensive/complex maintenance
  • Slow feel
  • Poor spare parts supply stability

5) Fu / “Gu” (carburetor version mentioned) — wasteful + small tires/seat + hard to carry

(Name appears partly garbled, but the presenter discusses a specific model’s drawbacks.)

Main issues:

  • Wasteful fuel consumption (“wasteful,” and “riding it makes me sore”).
  • Small tires.
  • Used pricing is highly variable:
    • Mentioned: Rp 3 million and Rp 1 million
    • “Most expensive” mentioned without clear quantification, still suggesting price collapse
  • Usability limitations:
    • Hard to carry things (poor cargo practicality)
    • Small seat
    • Hunched riding position
    • More suitable for young people than older riders

Pros (implied):

  • Can be affordable depending on condition/price.

Cons (dominant):

  • Fuel waste
  • Comfort/ergonomics issues + small tires
  • Not practical for carrying cargo
  • Limited audience suitability (more for younger riders)

Overall pros/cons theme (across the list)

Cons emphasized across almost all models

  • Fuel efficiency problems (Mio models; plus the carb model mentioned as wasteful)
  • CVT/drivetrain fragility if neglected (especially Mio CVT leak/break claims)
  • Electrical/radiator/carb-age related failures (Vario Carbu)
  • Rarity of spare parts + expensive repairs (Lexam/Trevo AT type)
  • Maintenance complexity (CVT, chain + belt, radiator, electrical)

Pros mentioned (limited/conditional)

  • Some bikes may be fun if maintained well (notably Vario Carbu)
  • Some Mio setups may be good for modification/hobby (Mio Carbo claims)

Comparisons made

  • Popularity vs parts availability: Lexam/Trevo AT described as less famous than mainstream options (e.g., Beat/Vario), explaining limited stock and parts availability.
  • Economy vs power: Mio designs described as sacrificing power/torque to prioritize fuel economy.

Numerical / rating info included

  • Clear age threshold: “more than 10 years old” for carbureted Vario becoming problematic.
  • No detailed fuel/maintenance numeric rating.
  • Used price examples: Rp 3 million and Rp 1 million (for the last mentioned model).

User experience / ownership advice given

  • Main advice: continue with extra care or sell (selling is suggested as a way to reduce stress and fuel waste).
  • If you already own one: “don’t be discouraged”, though the video still frames them as poor purchase choices overall.
  • Buying secondhand increases the chance of breakdown, especially for older carb Vario models.

Unique points list (deduplicated)

  • Mio Carbo / Mio carb: high fuel use; CVT prone to failure without maintenance; hobby/mod friendly; carb can be bored (~200cc); “full billet” mentioned; modified Mio 2 culture exists.
  • Mio G: frequent CVT/pulley leakage; weak power due to economy tuning; electrical short-circuit issues; injector stutter; bushings may become loose/compressed if mishandled.
  • Honda Vario Carbu: issues after 10+ years; CDI issues linked to carb problems; radiator + electrical failures common; choke breaks easily; expensive parts; rough/annoying maintenance; fun only if maintained healthy.
  • Yamaha Lexam / Trevo AT: cub-shaped but automatic; chain final drive; internal parts hard to find; expensive maintenance/repairs; chain + belt maintenance; feels slow due to drivetrain delay; rare model = scarce parts.
  • Final “Fu/Gu” carb model: wasteful; small tires; used prices vary (Rp 3m / Rp 1m mentioned); hard to carry things; small seat; hunched posture; better for young riders.

Speakers / views

  • Subtitles suggest one main speaker (no clearly separated multi-speaker debate).
  • Includes an anecdote referencing dealer/seller confusion about Lexam parts availability (narrated third-party perspective, not a separate speaker).

Verdict / recommendation

Don’t buy the listed models (Mio Carbo/Mio G, older carb Vario Techno 110, and the rare Lexam/Trevo AT cub-auto with chain, plus the wasteful small-tire model discussed), mainly due to fuel inefficiency, drivetrain/CVT or electrical/radiator fragility, and especially spare parts scarcity + expensive maintenance for rarer models.

If you already own one, the presenter suggests you can proceed with extra care, but the video’s overall recommendation is to avoid purchasing them.

Original video