Video summary

1 Star Rated Movies 2

Main summary

Key takeaways

Entertainment

Overview

This video is a rapid-fire takedown of extremely low-rated movies. The host tests whether their 1-star reviews are actually deserved, then delivers his own scores and declares a final “worst ever” winner.

1) One Miss Call (1-star horror) — the “phone death” gimmick

Hook

The film opens with a woman in her backyard dealing with strange events—until she (and her cat) are killed immediately. The killer appears to target people through their phone contacts.

Main story beats

  • The host follows Beth (the main character) as she gets pulled into a party where the intro victim’s death is being discussed.
  • Beth receives a call from the dead girl.
  • The voicemail is dated in the future.
  • Beth then hears her own death recorded on the other end.

Highlights / reactions

  • The host claims the movie peaks extremely early (around the first minutes), then collapses in quality.
  • He criticizes bad/cheap-looking visuals and says the curse never feels logical or genuinely threatening.

Big complaint

  • He can’t make sense of why the ghost needs missed calls to kill people—especially since it already killed a cat, making the rules feel inconsistent.

The “reveal” (mocked hard)

  • The ghost is revealed to be a child who died due to an asthma situation, trying to reach her phone.
  • The host calls the explanation dumb and incomplete, particularly the jump from her circumstances to why she murders everyone else.
  • He also roasts ending mechanics (including “CGI again”) and says certain plot devices feel added merely to look mysterious instead of making sense.

Score

  • 3.2 / 10

Bonus note

The host claims it’s a remake of a Japanese horror film that’s “better,” hoping the original is more coherent—and jokes the cat doesn’t get petty-killed there.

2) The Little Panda Fighter (Kung Fu Panda ripoff) — animation + misleading title

Premise recap

Set in a remote “Bear Bar Box” where nightly boxing fights happen, the restaurant’s business is failing because one fighter keeps winning. The polar bear boss goes undercover in a suit to beat the champion—except the suit shrinks, and everyone mistakes the boss for the panda, letting the panda take credit.

Highlights / jokes

  • The host repeatedly targets poor animation: lifeless backgrounds, lips not syncing, and an overall “looks bad on purpose” vibe.
  • He fixates on the overly sexualized design of the bear characters (“big hips and boobs”) as a major distraction and design flaw.

Plot criticism

  • Despite the “Little Panda Fighter” title, the panda rarely actually fights, instead preferring dancing and “martial arts” vibes that never deliver.
  • He also points out logic errors, such as the misunderstanding caused by disguise and a mistaken identity assumption (people believing the panda is who they think he is).

Score

  • 2.5 / 10

Additional jab

He says it’s not worse than the Emoji Movie, and that it’s short enough to survive mainly through mockery and laughter.

3) War of the Worlds 2025 (worst pick) — an alien invasion as a “watching it on a screen” product

Why it stands out

The host claims this may be the worst movie he’s covered.

Reactions to viewer reviews

He starts with audience quotes describing it as garbage and unbearable—worse than even notorious films like Cats.

Premise

Instead of being a survival/action version of War of the Worlds, Ice Cube’s character mostly monitors the destruction behind a desk/computer.

Major criticisms

  • Acting: The host says Ice Cube’s performance feels like “audible reactions” rather than real acting, including repeating the same shocked gestures (like taking off glasses).
  • Visual credibility: He argues it relies heavily on stock footage and reused tragedy/war imagery without convincing integration.
  • Amazon overload: The host calls it basically an Amazon commercial, with Amazon referenced constantly and even the plot using Amazon products to “save lives.”
    • Most outrageous example: an Amazon tape is used like a lifesaving medical tool during a stabbing/impalement scenario.

Alien motive twist (mocked)

  • Aliens want human data (emails, search history, social security).
  • The “fix the world” plan involves buying items and triggering a chain reaction using an Amazon drone/tech system.

Ending

The host says Ice Cube saves the planet and exposes government data storage, ending with the family wearing Baby Shark shirts—which he presents as “true cinema” (sarcastically).

Score

  • 1.5 / 10

Final jab

  • He declares it has dethroned 365 others, while leaving the door open for sequels.

Main personalities mentioned

  • The host/reviewer (unnamed in subtitles; main narrator providing ratings and commentary)
  • Ice Cube (War of the Worlds 2025)
  • Beth (One Miss Call)
  • Panca / Polaris (The Little Panda Fighter, though the host mostly focuses on premise flaws)
  • Rodri (plays Ice Cube’s character’s son-in-law in War of the Worlds 2025)

Original video