Video summary

РЕЙТИНГ АВТОКОСМЕТИКИ 2026

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

This video is not a review of a single product. It’s an auto-cosmetics “rating” (Fedorych Life, season 8) where subscribers voted for car detailing chemicals and accessories across many categories. Key “winner” products are repeatedly recommended for different use-cases (tires/wheels, shampoos, glass, anti-rain, coatings, interiors, etc.).

Overall key winners & what they’re best for (with numbers)

(Only the explicitly mentioned top positions/scores below.)

1) Tire & wheel cleaners

  • Winner: Shine Systems Tire & Wheel Cleaner — 1,312 votes
    • Strong cleaning; gets ready for coating application; not overly harsh to damage surfaces (implied).
  • 2nd: Wheels Plus — 748 votes
    • Concentrate; must be diluted (at least 1:1); aroma change noted (some people get tired of the smell).
  • 3rd: Wheels — 519 votes
    • Balanced detergency; “adequate smell”; doesn’t pick up ink again (discussed as stable/controlled cleaning).

2) Rubber / plastic tire & bumper-type “favorite rubber tires/plastic” (new nomination)

  • Winner: Smart Open Fast Winner — 185 votes
    • Quickly cleans but tends to darken/blacken rubber immediately
    • Emphasis: hydrophobic protection right away; better for lightly/moderately dirty parts or when time is limited.
  • 2nd: CarPro (Retire Strong Tire Cleaner, CarPro brand in this spot) — 135 votes
    • Notes about reaction varying with temperature (application conditions).
  • 3rd: Adams Polishes Tire and Rubber Cleaner
    • Also mentioned: hard to find locally.
    • (Score not clearly provided for 3rd.)

3) Tire & rubber impregnation (favorite “ink/impregnation”)

  • Winner: Black Star Mat — 552 votes
    • Strong matte effect; long-lasting “2–3x updates, some even every application”.
  • 2nd: Heroes (quartz matte / satin-like) — 368 votes
  • 3rd: Fireball Janus (quartz effect) — 326 votes
  • Category notes: hydrophobic effect, updates durability; cons: shade/matte level depends on tire type and application.

4) Protective disk coatings (sealants/ceramics for wheels)

  • 2nd: CarPro DLUX (ceramic) — 103 votes
  • Winner: Fireball “coupon/talon” ceramic for wheels/disks — (#1; score not clearly shown in text)
    • Pros: works on external unpainted plastic too; keeps hydrophobic feel for months (example: applied in September, still hydrophobic by end of February).
    • Cons: “only minus” hinted—getting inside areas is harder (because you can’t reach/hand-polish certain spots).
  • 3rd: Dodo Juice Wheeler… (sealant) (no score shown clearly)

5) Contactless shampoos (Russian winners inside category)

  • Winner (foreign contactless): Fireball Snowball (barberry aroma) — 286 votes
    • Multi-seasonal claim; in practice: good streak-free rinsing when left to dwell.
    • Requires dwell time; aroma fades.
  • Russian contactless category top mentions:
    • 1st: Smart Open EcoSave/Legend… (name partly garbled; exact score unclear)
    • 2nd: Furioka’s touchless shampoo — 269 votes (mentioned for 3rd place in Russian segment)
    • General cons: foam thickness depends on foam attachments; some products aren’t “as strong as alkaline shampoos.”

6) Hand washing shampoos (Russian + foreign)

  • Russian hand shampoo winner: Sleek Ice (Fero) (score not fully shown)
  • Russian hand shampoo top 3:
    • 1st: Sleek Ice (Fero)
    • 2nd: Shine Systems Cherry Bomb — 417 votes
    • 3rd: Furioka “Slimy Fo…” (score not clearly stated)
  • Foreign hand shampoos winner: Fireball Pear(l)/Showcar shampoo (new version) — 280 votes
    • Pros: easy to rinse, no film that interferes with hydrophobics, good for ceramic/waxes maintenance.
    • Cons: reportedly not ideal for foam kit (some disappointment mentioned).

7) Acid shampoo (for calcium prevention)

  • Winner: Asock (F Heros) — #1 in category (score not fully clear)
  • 2nd: F Heros Citrus acid composition — 386 votes
  • 3rd: Shine Systems “acid shampoo” (3rd; score not clearly given)
  • Strong caution repeated: acidic shampoos are not for frequent use; health concerns mentioned (use in open space; gloves). Best used only when it “really matters” (rails/contamination response).

8) Iron remover / metallic inclusions

  • 3rd: CarPro Iron X — 249 votes
  • 2nd: F Heroes Double Iron — (score not fully captured for 2nd)
  • Winner: Shine Systems Iron off — 735 votes
    • Pros: very “stormy reaction”; high activity.
    • Cons: professional-grade handling—requires gloves, stay away from car; heavy caution about fumes/cloud.

9) Anti-bitumen (tar remover) — least-liked category

  • 3rd: CarPro Tar X (score not fully shown)
  • 2nd: Tar Spirit (F Heros) — 434 votes
  • Winner: Shine Systems Bitom — (described as 1st; score not shown clearly)
  • Caution: some products can attack/affect plastic if left too long.

10) Degreasers (check/prep / anti-silicone)

  • 3rd: Shine Systems Check and Prep
  • 2nd: Heroes Easy PR
  • Winner: Shine Systems “IPA/EP…” (degreaser) — (score not clearly shown; “first place absolutely deserved”)
    • Pros: evaporates easily, very effective, easy to work.

11) Calcium stain remover (for hard water spots on glass/body)

  • 3rd: G9 (score not fully given)
  • 2nd: Faboall Watspot — 203 votes
  • Winner: Shine Systems… terspots/spotless — (winner; score not explicitly stated, praised as very effective)
  • Cons: gel/thick formulas—apply carefully; trigger spray may be inconvenient (breathing caution implied).

12) Glass cleaners (regular glass)

  • 3rd: F Heros Citrus Glaz (score not fully clear)
  • 2nd: Shine Systems GLC — 240 votes
  • Winner: Fireball GLC — 412 votes
    • Pros: minimal streaks, antistatic effect, works on TVs/screens; very popular in chat.
    • Noted: less residue on screens compared to others.

13) Anti-rain (windshield hydrophobic coating)

  • 3rd: Aquapel Capsule — 301 votes (capsule type)
    • Pros: easy to apply; reviews often from women (feminine audience noted).
  • 2nd: F Heros Kickdown
    • Pros: works, but 70/30 split in reviews; application quantity affects haze/speed-drop-off.
  • Winner: BR Cosmetics (Space/CS capsule category) — 430 votes
    • Pros: easy application; good performance; capsule design.

14) Coatings for wheels/disks / “fast quartz” (spray knockdown coatings)

  • 3rd: Shine Systems Fast Quartz
  • 2nd: Fireball Easy Cold — 348 votes
  • Winner: Fireball/Her os M Drops (M Drops) — #1 in category
    • Pros: fragrance mentioned; hydrophobic + shine; value.

15) Quick detailers for body (spray “after washing”)

  • 3rd: CarPro Elixir
  • 2nd: (classic quick detailer) — #2 (score not shown clearly)
  • Winner: F Heros Blaze Booster
    • Pros: more like protective coating; strong gloss and hydrophobic, but may require careful polishing to avoid spots.

16) Ceramic coatings (up to 10,000 rubles)

  • 3rd: Fireball Angel Tears 2 (and 2.0) — described as forgiving for mistakes
  • 2nd: F Heros Kiramos — #2
  • Winner: Keramos Plus (older/normal Keramos vs Plus) — described as more “for connoisseurs”
    • Pros: very good hydrophobe and shine.
    • Cons: reportedly more expensive and “second layer not allowed” / requires careful application.

17) Wax coatings (protective waxes)

  • 3rd: Fireball Graphene — 133 votes
  • 2nd: Fireball / … (ANBD/other Korean wax) — 133 votes (tied)
  • Winner: Fireball (Milk/“Milk Cream”) — 142 votes

18) Quick interior detailer + interior plastic impregnation

  • Quick interior detailer winner: Inerka — #1
    • Pros: strong cleaning, nice pairing with other interior chemicals; noted lemon aroma that becomes annoying but liked for results.
  • Plastic impregnation nomination winner: Fireball / Napa Code — #1
    • (3rd place explicitly mentioned as Fireball “on the code” with “215 votes”; #1 not scored clearly here.)

19) Leather cleaner (skin)

  • 3rd: Shine Systems Laser Cleaner — 320 votes
  • 2nd: Fireball Napa Cleaner — #2 (score not shown)
  • Winner: F Heros Pure Laser — #1
    • Pros: softens leather; monthly/1.5–2 month maintenance suggested.
    • Cons: avoid over-quantity on some products to prevent sliding effect.

20) Drying (microfiber for body drying)

  • 3rd: F Heros Collector — 204 votes
  • 2nd: Drive Monster Double Twist XL — #2
  • Winner: Big Monster (large microfiber) — #1
    • Pros: easier wiping, less effort, dries effectively once; looped microfibers (everyone switched to loop pile).

Pros (general themes across winners)

  • High effectiveness: consistently “works” and cleans properly without damaging.
  • Hydrophobic / protective effect: many winners emphasize hydrophobe durability.
  • User-friendliness: easier dilution/application and less chance of ruining results (especially in impregnations/ceramics).
  • Good value / “economical consumption” in several categories (especially Fireball spray-type products and microfiber care).

Cons / cautions mentioned repeatedly

  • Correct dilution and dwell time matter: touchless shampoos; Fast Winner; citrus/acid formulas.
  • Safety for acids / strong removers: gloves, open space/ventilation, avoid inhalation, avoid contact and extended exposure.
  • Surface damage risk if misused: tar/bitumen removers may affect plastic if left too long; some strong formulations can cause undesirable darkening or residue.
  • Application technique matters for ceramics/coatings: polishing quality, avoiding second layers, reaching hard-to-access areas.

Comparisons made

Most comparisons are within-category, typically based on:

  • cleaning strength vs softness,
  • hydrophobic quality,
  • matte vs satin vs glossy finish,
  • durability,
  • smell/aroma fatigue,
  • foam behavior (foam kit compatibility).

For shampoos, comparisons also address:

  • alkaline vs more delicate formulas
  • Russian vs foreign availability/price (foreign often more expensive).

Overall user experience (from hosts/comments)

  • Hosts describe practical scenarios: self-wash, limited time, quick application, foam kit usage, highway dirt, winter use.
  • Durability over months is a recurring theme (e.g., wheel ceramics still hydrophobic from September to February).
  • Protection products can interact: shampoo/cleaner film can affect existing protection (wax/ceramics vs shampoo behavior).

Unique product points mentioned (consolidated)

  1. Tire/wheel cleaners: strong detergency, minimal odor, prep for coatings.
  2. Wheel cleaners: concentrate dilution required (often 1:1), aroma fatigue for some.
  3. Rubber/plastic products: fast blackening + hydrophobic immediately; cleaning power may be moderate.
  4. Tire impregnations: matte/satin control, hydrophobic longevity; shade depends on tire type.
  5. Wheel protective coatings (ceramics/sealants): durability in months; inner wheel areas are harder to reach.
  6. Contactless shampoos: foam-kit thickness affects performance; dwell time prevents streaks; multi-season usability.
  7. Hand shampoos: high lubrication; no interfering film for hydrophobics; foam-kit compatibility varies.
  8. Acid shampoos: calcium/alkali neutralization; not for frequent use; safety concerns (open space/gloves).
  9. Iron removers: “stormy reaction” and strong metal capture; careful safety handling due to cloud/odor.
  10. Anti-bitumen: effective on old bitumen/glue; monitor plastic compatibility and contact time.
  11. Degreasers: anti-silicone effect; easy evaporation; effective after polishing.
  12. Calcium spot removers: powerful but must not dry out; gel thickness needs careful application.
  13. Glass cleaners: low streaks, antistatic effect; good for screens/TVs.
  14. Anti-rain: capsule vs liquid performance; application quantity affects haze/long-term.
  15. Fast quartz/spray coatings: easy after-wash; good hydrophobic “knockdown”.
  16. Quick detailers: more like protective coating; careful polishing needed to avoid spots.
  17. Ceramics under 10k: forgiving vs expensive “connoisseur” types; sometimes second layer not allowed.
  18. Waxes: praised for durability/gloss and ease of use.
  19. Drying microfibers: loop pile preferred; large microfiber makes drying easier and lasts longer.

Speakers’ distinct views/aspects (end of video)

  • Main host (Yaroslav): overall rationale for winners, practical usage scenarios (winter/summer, limited time), safety discipline.
  • Anton (co-host): supplements testing experience and checks usability/compatibility (foam kit, smell changes, etc.).
  • Subscribers/chat: real-life performance opinions (durability, dilution behavior, smell preference, foam thickness, streaks/haze, temperature effects).

Concise verdict / recommendation

Based on the video’s results, Shine Systems and Fireball are the most consistently top-voted brands across cleaning, coatings, and glass products, with Fireball especially strong in value/ease-of-use across multiple categories.

“Safe picks” from the rating:

  • Shine Systems wheel/tire cleaner (1,312 votes)
  • Fireball top contactless (286 votes)
  • Fireball top glass cleaner (412 votes)

Just follow the repeated cautions on acid/iron removers and dwell/contact time.

Original video