Video summary
Best Large & Midcap Funds 2026: Step-by-Step Selection Process
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-focused summary (Large & Midcap mutual fund selection framework)
Definition / category rules
- Large-cap: Top 100 Indian companies by market capitalization.
- Mid-cap: Next 150 companies.
- Large & midcap funds must invest:
- ≥ 35% in large-cap stocks
- ≥ 35% in mid-cap stocks
- Remaining 30% can be allocated flexibly (based on markets/fund manager skill).
Step-by-step selection process (as described)
Step 1: Universe setup (filter by AUM / age)
Exclude funds with:
- AUM < ₹25,500 crore (as stated), or
- less than 3 years since launch.
It also mentions excluding very small/young funds based on an AEM-related cutoff (wording is inconsistent in subtitles), with the intent to remove funds where AEM is “< ₹2,500 crore” or similarly very small.
Step 2: Benchmark outperformance screen
Compare the fund’s returns vs the benchmark returns across timeframes:
- 1-year
- 3-year
- 5-year
- 10-year
Then categorize:
- Green: beats benchmark
- Yellow: roughly equal
- Red: underperforms
Exclusion rule: remove funds that do not beat the benchmark consistently.
Underperformers mentioned as examples of exclusions include:
- Mirae Asset Large & Mid Cap (example: 1Y underperformance vs benchmark)
- Franklin India Large & Mid Cap
- CANDL(A)/C[an]dla Irbeco Large & Mid Cap
- Tata Large & MidCap Fund
- Aditya Birla Sun Life Large & Mid Fund
- LIC and Mahindra Manulife L&MidC (mentioned as underperformers)
Step 3: Risk + quality metrics screen (for remaining funds)
Evaluate metrics such as:
- Rolling returns (consistency)
- Expense ratio (lower is better)
- Standard deviation (higher = riskier)
- Sharpe ratio (higher = better vs risk-free proxy like government securities)
- Alpha (higher positive alpha = better relative to benchmark)
- Up market capture ratio (higher = better)
- Down market capture ratio (lower = better; implies less fall when market falls)
Step 4: Additional exclusions due to negative alpha
Exclude funds with negative alpha:
- Mirae Asset Large & Mid Cap Fund (alpha described as negative, “underperforming consistently”)
- Sundaram Large & Mid Cap Fund (alpha described as negative 0.94)
Step 5: Points-based ranking (top 5)
For each metric rank (rolling returns, expense ratio, standard deviation, Sharpe ratio, alpha, up/down capture), assign points:
- #1 = 5 points
- #2 = 4 points
- #3 = 3 points
- #4 = 2 points
- #5 = 1 point
Sum points across metrics to determine the best fund(s).
Key numeric results & outcomes (Top funds by total points)
Rolling returns ranking (3-year average rolling returns)
- Motilal Oswal Large & Mid Cap: 29.82%
- Invesco India Large & Mid Cap: 27.48%
- Bandhan Large & Mid Cap: 27.43%
- UTI Large & Mid Cap: 24.12%
- ICICI Prudential (PDL) Large & Mid Cap: 23.41%
Expense ratio (lower is better)
- Bandhan
- Edelweiss
- DSP
- Invesco
- Kotak
- A specific expense ratio value is mentioned for Kotak: “57” (likely 0.57%, but unit is unclear in subtitles).
Standard deviation (lower = better / less risk)
- SBI Large & Mid Cap: 13.57
- Axis Large & Mid Cap: 14.24
- ICICI Prudential Potential Larg[e] & Mid Cap (name garbled in subtitles; likely “Prudential”)
- Kotak
- UTI
Sharpe ratio (higher = better)
- “Bond” fund name appears garbled: 1.00
- Invesco India Large & Mid Cap: 0.92
- Motilal Oswal
- ICICI
- HSBC
Alpha (higher = better)
- Motilal Oswal: 6.45
- “Bond”: 5.64
- Invesco India: 5.44
- HSBC
- ICICI
Market capture ratios (up capture higher; down capture lower)
Up market capture ratio
-
Motilal Oswal: 132 (described as 32% more than index; index up 100 points, fund up 132 points)
-
Invesco India: (value not clearly shown)
- Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund: (subtitle garbling; “market capture ratio of 12” appears)
- Tie: HSBC and Bandhan at 113
- Tie: UTI, Nippon, and HSBC also mentions 113 (subtitle inconsistencies)
Down market capture ratio (lower = better)
- ICICI mentioned as lowest: 77
- SBI second: 78
- Axis fourth
- UTI fifth (other values not consistently clear due to subtitles)
Final point totals (declared “best fund” outcome)
- Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund — 20 points (rank #1)
- Motilal Oswal Large & Mid Cap Fund — 18 points (rank #2)
- Invesco India Large & Mid Cap Fund — 16 points (rank #3)
- ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund — 12 points (rank #4)
- SBI Large & Mid Cap Fund — 9 points (rank #5)
Risk-based guidance given (conditional)
- Bandhan: positioned as lower-risk with “good returns” (based on described lower standard deviation + overall scoring).
- SBI / ICICI (ICICI Pru): suggested for low-risk investors seeking lower risk.
- Bandhan / Invesco: for moderate risk investors.
- Motilal Oswal: for high-risk / aggressive investors only, with explicit caution:
- Very high standard deviation (21.37; described as highest)
- Down market capture described as very high (example: index falls 100 → fund falls 116), implying worse downside behavior than the index.
Disclosures / cautions
The presenter states: no direct recommendation.
- Video is for educational purposes only.
- Viewers should do their own research before investing.
Instruments / tickers / entities mentioned
Mutual fund schemes (tickers not provided)
- Bajaj Finserv Large & Midcap Fund
- Vito Capital (name garbled) Large & Midcap Fund
- BNP Paribas Union (name garbled) Large & Midcap Fund
- Mirae Asset Large & Mid Cap Fund (name partially garbled)
- Franklin India Large & Mid Cap Fund
- C[an]dla Irbeco Large & Mid Cap Fund (name garbled)
- Tata Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Aditya Birla Sun Life Large & Mid Fund
- LIC Large & Midcap (scheme name garbled)
- Mahindra Manulife L&MidC Fund
- Sundaram Large & Mid Cap Fund
- SBI Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Kotak Large & Mid Cap Fund
- ICICI Prudential Large & Mid Cap Fund
- DSP Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Motilal Oswal Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Axis Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Invesco India Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Nippon India Large & Mid Cap Fund
- UTI Large & Mid Cap Fund
- HSBC Large & Mid Cap Fund (name as given)
- Edelweiss Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Quant Large & Mid Cap Fund
- Bandhan Large & Mid Cap Fund
Benchmark / market index reference
- Referred to as “benchmark index” (not named).
Presenters / sources
- Puneet Nagpal, introduced as a Certified Financial Planner.