Video Summary - 3 TAHUN PAKAI MOBIL LISTRIK IONIQ 5 SELAMA 64RB KM!

Product reviewed

Hyundai IONIQ 5 (EV) — owner review after 3 years (2022–2025) and ~64,000 km (about 20,000 km/year).

Key features / what the reviewer highlights

Battery & range usability

The battery is described as still performing like early ownership.
Estimated real-world range: ~500–550 km per 100% charge.
Includes a real-life heavy-load trip example: ~80 km with 3 adults + 3 children + full luggage.
- Estimated uphill reduction: ~14%
- Reviewer notes a rough calculation suggesting minimal degradation.
Uses WLTP-based range expectations and argues competitors often market range using different standards, making comparisons unfair.
V2L function used as an “at-home generator” during power outages.
- Claimed benefit: less noisy than a gasoline generator.
- Tested ability to run household power from 100% to 20% battery.

Charging cost / running cost experience

One full charge is said to provide high savings vs petrol.
Petrol anecdote: IDR 500,000 worth of petrol lasts less than a week for the same routines.
EV vs petrol comparison mentioned: roughly ~10% of petrol cost for a similar range (exact numbers are partially unclear due to subtitles).

Interior comfort & soundproofing

Strong soundproofing: thick foam/dampener under panels.
- Cabin remains quiet even without double-glazed windows.
Seat material (reported as “vegan leather” / eco-leather) is described as breaking in like real leather over time.

Practicality / electronics

Center console praised as more practical than some versions.
- Reviewer notes easier exit because of console layout.
Android Auto / Apple CarPlay (wireless) work well.
A USB port was previously damaged but later repaired under warranty.
A front projection feature is used to display content.

Durability notes (non-battery)

Suspension generally feels durable.
- Compared to Santa Fe and Palisade: good shock absorber longevity, though toll-road ride becomes bouncy after some mileage.
Interior/exterior materials hold up well, with a few recurring wear points.

Problems / cons mentioned (with examples)

1) 12V battery issue (not the main EV battery)

Even though it’s an EV, it still uses a 12-volt battery.
Reviewer experienced a “dead 12V battery” recently (dash warning to replace).
Replacement cost: under ~Rp 3 million (exact figure partly unclear).
Battery type mentioned: 5621 LN2 MF (described as hard to find).
Suggestion: keep a power bank/jumper to restart/enable access to services.
Reviewer states there are no special jump/start tricks:
- Hyundai repair shop confirmed you can replace directly without special jumpering.

2) Coolant / service cost for EV system

Mentions pink/white coolant types:
- battery coolant vs motor coolant
It must be drained every ~60,000 km.
Official Hyundai service estimate: ~Rp 2–5 million (unclear exact number).
Reason given: “special non-conductive radiator fluid.”

3) Tires are expensive (and large size)

Tires cost roughly Rp 2+ million per tire (one line mentions 4 million+, but subtitle is inconsistent).
Reason: EV-specific tire + R20 size.
Pros: tires wear well; tread still usable after 64,000 km.
Cons: small edge cracks, but still not time to replace.

4) Recurring cabin/fit-and-finish wear

Rear interior/trim issues
- Some IONIQ 5s have rear creaking; reviewer says this car has no creak so far.
- Mentions other owners fix with added padding/parts.
Rubber components come loose easily
- Door/window rubber described as thick but easy to peel off, a known issue across IONIQ 5 variants.
- Reviewer also mentions Santa Fe in comparison.
- Instead of glue, they re-install pieces.
Rear inner fender carpet weakens
- Carpet becomes weak and needs tightening/glue, especially after muddy roads.
Roof/glass creaking
- Top glass sometimes creaks slightly.
- Reviewer says it’s masked by the sound system.

5) Resale value is the biggest annoyance

Main complaint: resale drop due to market changes:
- Initial release around ~Rp 860 million
- Demand-driven spike: up to ~Rp 900+ million (subtitle fragments)
- VAT change (11% → 1%) caused a sharp drop to ~Rp 700–800 million
Increased competition from Chinese EVs expanded buyer options, pushing second-hand prices down.

Battery durability / warranty context

Reviewer reports the battery remains healthy after 64,000 km in 3 years, with no noticeable performance decline.
Warranty stated: 8 years or 160,000 km.
Reviewer plans not to sell until 8 years to validate long-term durability.
ICCU update is described as important:
- claim: not updating can “eat the battery”
- reviewer says ICCU has been updated “since last year” (timing unclear in subtitles)
- battery has been fine so far.

Comparisons vs other EVs / standards

Range standards comparison (major theme)

Reviewer argues Hyundai presents IONIQ 5 range using WLTP.
Many competitors use NEDC / CLTC / other standards, making their claims less directly comparable.
Claim: this causes consumer confusion because marketing range often looks higher than what real buyers experience.
Examples referenced:
- Omoda: uses different claim standards (NEDC-like comparison vs WLTP-like context)
- BYD/Chinese EVs: often use CLTC or other standards
- Cherry: described as using “two standards,” with WLTP comparisons
- Mentions brands using “Era” standard (subtitle suggests a large mismatch), including Citroen

Ride quality vs newer Chinese EVs

Reviewer’s conclusion: IONIQ 5 still has advantages in ride quality and comfort—a “European standard” feel.

Competition in budget segments

With a budget of ~IDR 500 million, many EV options exist now.
Implicit takeaway: market competition makes IONIQ 5 resale less attractive.

Pros (as stated)

Battery still feels strong after 3 years / 64,000 km; no felt degradation and acceleration/performance unchanged.
Large running cost savings vs petrol for daily use.
Comfort and soundproofing (thick foam/dampener).
Eco/vegan leather quality: breaks in and becomes more natural.
Suspension durability generally good (minimal rattling; compared favorably to expectations).

Cons (as stated)

12V battery replacement can be a problem (dead battery warning; cost and sourcing difficulty).
Expensive tires due to EV-specific R20 size.
Some common trim/rubber/carpet loosening issues.
Resale value decline is the most annoying.
Range marketing confusion due to different testing standards across brands.

Unique points list (all distinct mentions)

First personal EV; very expensive original purchase.
Usage: 2022–2025, 64,000 km (~20,000 km/year).
Minor accident damage to headlight area; replacement around ~Rp 3 million and advice not to buy used insurance parts.
12V battery located in the front; recently replaced; specific type hard to find; replacement under ~Rp 3 million.
When 12V fails, use a power bank/jumper; no special replacement tricks required per Hyundai shop.
Coolant (pink/white): drained every ~60,000 km; official service ~Rp 2–5 million; non-conductive fluid.
Exterior detailing/wrapping history (white wrap for G20 then returned).
Tires: EV-specific, R20, expensive (Rp 2M+ range); tread still good; small cracks present.
Tire wear depends on driving style and vehicle weight (heavy EV, ~70 kWh referenced).
Rear creaking exists in some IONIQ 5s, but this car has no creak so far; other owners use padding/aftermarket fixes.
Rear trunk customization: removed subwoofer; added a stand (Bekja Autotronics).
Sound insulation: thick foam dampener; quiet cabin even without double-glass.
Rubber trim can detach easily (door/window rubbers); common across IONIQ 5 and also seen in Santa Fe; re-install instead of glue.
Inner fender carpet weakens over time (rear only); needs tightening/glue; common after muddy roads.
Top glass creaks slightly; not audible over audio.
Center console practicality praised.
USB port damaged then repaired under warranty; Android Auto/CarPlay depends on good USB cables.
Front projection + infotainment (YouTube/Netflix); reviewer says it’s “fun,” kids use it more than the driver.
Eco-leather/leather described as made from plant oils (corn/canola) and recycled materials; breaks in like real leather.
Wear patterns vary between steering wheel and seats; driver seat wrinkles sooner.
Door trim generally holds up; dirty-prone part identified in recycling/trim area.
AC part desire to buy not found online (shared car mentioned).
Range estimate: ~500–550 km at 100% based on rough trip calculation and real experience.
Range standards comparison: WLTP vs NEDC/CLTC/Era; claims competitors’ numbers aren’t directly comparable.
V2L used for home lighting/generator during power outages; less noisy than gasoline generator; tested 100% to 20% for home electricity.
Battery degradation expectation: warranty 8 years/160,000 km; reviewer wants to confirm through 8 years.
Suspension durability: compared to Santa Fe/Palisade; shock absorbers may weaken on toll roads after higher mileage; toll-road bounciness mentioned.
ICCU updates to prevent battery issues (claim: not updated can “eat the battery”).
Biggest annoyance: resale value drop due to VAT change and more EV competition.
Charging vs petrol costs: petrol expenses and EV savings described (numerical details partially unclear).
Final recommendation: still worth buying versus newer Chinese EVs for comfort/ride quality and “worry-free” ownership; dislikes wide body for small alleys.

Speakers

Single main speaker / reviewer: The entire review is from one person’s perspective (“my” experiences and conclusions).
No clearly distinct additional speaker segments.

Concise verdict / recommendation

Recommended for buyers who value ride comfort, a quiet cabin, and stable real-world ownership. The reviewer feels the IONIQ 5’s battery health and performance remain strong after 64,000 km / 3 years, with strong cost savings and good practicality.

Main cautions: plan for 12V battery replacement, expect expensive tires/service, and consider that resale value may be weak due to market shifts and pricing/test-standard differences between EVs.

3 TAHUN PAKAI MOBIL LISTRIK IONIQ 5 SELAMA 64RB KM!

Key takeaways