O SUBMUNDO DOS ANÚNCIOS RUINS

Business Summary

The video explains why some mobile-game companies deliberately use crude, misleading-looking ads—and how those ads fit into a broader user-acquisition and monetization strategy.

Growth and Advertising Playbook

• Move from expensive celebrity campaigns to low-cost creative testing.

  • Game of War reportedly spent $40 million on a four-month campaign featuring Kate Upton, including a Super Bowl commercial. In early 2015, the game was earning more than $1 million per day, roughly double its revenue a year earlier, and briefly passed Clash of Clans in the App Store rankings. The boost was costly and did not last.
  • Later campaigns often relied on cheaper, meme-like, or deliberately frustrating creative: Mafia City’s “that’s how mafia works” ad, Lily’s Garden’s relationship storyline, and puzzle or “wrong move” ads for games such as Hero Wars, Whiteout Survival, and Last War.

• Use “fail” ads to provoke engagement. The video describes this approach as Fail Edge: show someone making an obvious mistake so viewers feel they could do better. The creative draws on:

  • Ego and competitiveness: Viewers want to prove they can solve an apparently easy challenge.
  • Schadenfreude: A cited study found that greater competitiveness was associated with more pleasure at another person’s failure and a greater desire to download.
  • Pattern interruption and rage bait: Ugly or irritating ads stand out in polished feeds; angry comments can still increase engagement and distribution.
  • The Zeigarnik effect: Cutting away before a puzzle is solved leaves the task unresolved and encourages viewers to keep thinking about it.

• Let performance data select the ads. The video’s central operational point is that companies may not choose “bad” ads in a meeting; they test many versions and keep the ones that acquire players most cheaply. It reports 46.2 million distinct mobile-game ads from nearly 260,000 advertisers in 2024. Whiteout Survival allegedly had more than 5,000 ad versions running at once in July 2026.

Unit Economics and Monetization

The business model tolerates substantial early churn if a small share of acquired players spend heavily:

• Average advertising cost to install a strategy game: about $2.77.
• One cited iPhone estimate put one-month retention at 4% for Last War and 8% for Whiteout Survival.
• A 2014 SWRVE analysis found that 0.15% of mobile gamers generated half of in-game spending—the high-spending users commonly called “whales.”
• Research on more than 7,700 players who purchased reward boxes found that top spenders did not necessarily have higher incomes; about one-third showed signs of problematic spending.

The video characterizes the funnel as a wide net: acquire many users cheaply, expect most to leave, and earn enough from the smaller retained and spending segment to cover acquisition costs. The practical economic test is whether the cost to acquire a player is lower than the revenue generated by players who stay.

Company and market figures cited:

• Whiteout Survival reportedly exceeded $4 billion in revenue.
• Last War reportedly generated about $180 million in September 2025, making it the highest-grossing mobile game globally that month.
• Century Youatong, the parent of Century Games, reportedly recorded 27 billion yuan in revenue and nearly 10 billion yuan in selling expenses in the first nine months of 2025—about four out of every ten yuan spent on selling and promotion.
• The video says 82.8% of Brazilians play some type of game, with mobile the preferred platform. In October 2026, King Shot, Whiteout Survival, and Last War were among Brazil’s top-grossing strategy games on Google Play.

Product and Onboarding Strategy

Some games have turned advertised mini-games into real features:

• Hero Wars added some pin-puzzle content, and Playrix added mini-games to Homescapes and Gardenscapes.
• In early 2025, the video says over 60% of Last War’s first four to five minutes consisted of its portal mini-game, and more than half of its ad views showed that mini-game.

This creates a staged onboarding approach: give users the activity promised by the ad first, then gradually introduce the game’s broader base-building and strategy systems.

A Nexters survey of more than 5,000 players reportedly found that 91% of U.S. gamers had seen these ads; 35–46% said they would not quit after discovering the game differed from its ad. In Brazil, nearly 70% reportedly agreed that the ads were more fascinating than the games themselves. The video notes that Nexters has a commercial interest in this topic, so the survey should be considered in that context.

AI and Creative Production

AI is accelerating the volume and lowering the cost of ad production:

• The video says 56 of the world’s 100 highest-grossing mobile games in 2025 used AI-made ads.
• King Shot reportedly launched more than 2,000 ad variations in one day.
• FFER figures cited put major game advertisers at 2,400–2,600 variations per quarter, an increase of nearly 30%.
• The video also says Activision faced criticism in 2025 for AI-made ads depicting games that did not exist.

The operational implication is that AI makes large-scale creative testing easier, but it can also increase the gap between an ad and the actual product.

Compliance and Business Risks

The video describes a growing risk of misleading-ad enforcement:

• The UK’s ASA banned two Playrix ads in 2020, including one claiming “only 5% can solve this.” Playrix reportedly said only 0.03% of players played far enough to reach that puzzle.
• The ASA also ruled against a Top War ad in 2022 and an Evony ad in 2024, and stated that disclaimers do not cure a misleading presentation of gameplay.
• China’s Game Industry Association reportedly prohibited ads showing gameplay that is not actually in the game from February 2025. Google Play also prohibits apps that profit from deceptive ads.
• In Brazil, the video cites Consumer Protection Code Articles 37 and 38: misleading advertising is prohibited, and the advertiser must substantiate its claims. The presenter says he found no relevant Conar rulings and notes uncertainty around enforcement for free-to-download games.

The strategic tension is that misleading creative may lower acquisition costs and generate short-term revenue, but it can create regulatory exposure, damage trust, and rely on vulnerable spending behavior.

Practical Takeaways

• Evaluate campaigns on acquisition cost, retention, and downstream revenue, not clicks or installs alone.
• If an ad promotes a specific game mechanic, make that mechanic genuinely available early in the player experience.
• Use rapid creative testing to learn what works, but set clear boundaries for truthful representation and responsible monetization.
• Treat high engagement—including angry comments—as a distribution signal, not necessarily as evidence of positive customer value.

Presenter and Sources Mentioned

Copas (presenter); Evony; Game of War; Kate Upton; Nexters; Eric Seufert; Matej Lancarik; Jamie Cohen (the subtitles render the name inconsistently); SWRVE; Navic; researchers in Psychology & Marketing; researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and British universities; media professor Jie Coran (name as transcribed); Bluma Zeigarnik; Steve Meretzky; FFER; the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA); China’s Game Industry Association; Google Play; and Brazil’s Conar and Consumer Protection Code.