Video summary
Velké srovnání ojetých elektrických hatchbacků VW ID.3 a MG4. Který z nich je lepší koupit?
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product reviewed / compared
A comparison of used electric hatchbacks:
- Volkswagen ID.3 (including pre- and post-facelift differences)
- MG4 (including higher-trim examples with large batteries)
Key features mentioned
Volkswagen ID.3
- Modern electric hatchback (~Golf size) with more interior space thanks to the electric platform.
- Large battery versions discussed:
- Facelift example: ~550 km VLTP range, largest battery, full equipment
- ~1.5 years old, ~30,000 km
- Price: 850,000 CZK incl. VAT
Charging (400V context)
- Promised up to 170 kW, observed ~185 kW
- 10–80% in ~29 minutes (in their test)
Interior & tech (facelift improvements)
- Facelift addressed early criticism with better padded/softer materials (door tops, stitching, more premium feel)
- Screen evolution:
- 10” (pre-facelift) → 12” (facelift)
- 13” planned with new infotainment (software v4.0 mentioned)
- Head-up display with augmented reality for navigation guidance
- Wireless charging, practical storage, and strong ergonomics
- In higher trims:
- Panoramic glass roof
- Cameras noted as 360° (on their example)
Comfort & driving feel
- Quiet cabin with good soundproofing
- Good visibility from the driving position
- Advantage: excellent rear-seat space (rear legroom; “cross legs” mentioned)
- Massage seats available on ID.3 (in some trims; not on MG4)
Limitations
- Steering wheel touch button responsiveness criticized
- 2024 fix: previously unlit volume/temperature touch buttons problem addressed
- No true single-pedal to a full stop: with selector on B, strong regen still requires braking below ~10 km/h
- No rear A/C vents (depends on front settings)
MG4
- Similar size (~4.3 m length, ~2.8 m wheelbase) but lighter than ID.3 by ~300 kg (per speaker)
- Large battery example:
- 74 kWh battery, ~520 km VLTP
- Top version Exclusive 77, full equipment
Performance & driving character
- Higher motor power: described as more agile/faster than ID.3
Charging
- Max charging power mentioned: ~135 kW (large battery version)
- 10 minutes longer for 10–80% stop vs ID.3 (time difference emphasized)
- Charging curve described as less flat than ID.3
Interior & UI trade-offs
- Clean concept with minimal buttons, but uses physical/hardware buttons (vs ID.3 touch approach)
- No head-up display (even AR absent)
- Infotainment perceived as lower level vs ID.3:
- Fewer options
- No apps/games/app store
- Slower performance
- Navigation still “relatively good”
- Single-zone air conditioning (ID.3 has dual-zone)
- Ergonomics note: hard/annoying knee contact area for taller drivers (“module could be removed”)
Rear seat & trunk
- Rear space: “royal for the category,” but less than ID.3
- Seats have slight thigh support rise; no rear armrest, no rear vents, more hard plastics
- Trunk: ~363 L vs ID.3 385 L (similar)
- Cost-cutting details:
- 12V socket missing in the trunk
- Less protective trim/plastics; different plate/handle quality
- Fewer/cheaper tie-down/closing mechanisms
- No ski rack / long-item solution: must fold seats fully
Real-world efficiency / consumption results
They drove a combined route (highway + city + villages) in cold-ish conditions (“zero outside”, not ideal for EVs).
- ID.3 consumption: 18.5 kWh/100 km
- MG4 consumption: 20.7 kWh/100 km
- Difference noted as >2 kWh/100 km, suggesting ID.3 is more efficient
Additional “final” numbers (second run):
- MG4 final: 18.4 kWh/100 km
- ID.3 final: 17.2 kWh/100 km
Conclusion: ID.3 is more economical in real-world use.
Charging & range notes (summary with ranges)
Real-world range expectations (based on battery size)
- ID.3 (largest battery):
- ~400 km highway
- ~500 km combined
- ID.3 (58 kWh medium battery):
- ~300 km highway
- ~380 km combined
- MG4: “very similar,” but consumes slightly more; subtract ~10% from ID.3’s values for real range
Winter caveat: battery preheating before charging
- ID.3: no active preheating before charging until 2023
- MG4: has it
- Therefore, in winter charging performance can become more comparable.
Reliability / software & service experience
ID.3 reliability concerns
- Main earlier issue: software, improved with over-the-air updates
- Advice: check ID software number 3.7 on older units
- Occasional faults:
- grounding failure during charging
- cosmetic issue: defective light cover glass projecting logo when door opens
- Warranty note: implied improvement after OTA; emphasis on updated software state
MG4 reliability concerns
- Highlighted software problems:
- “phantom fault” warnings
- infotainment freezing
- touchscreen issues requiring restart
- Claimed limitation: MG4 lacks over-the-air updates, so fixes need a service center visit
- Serious bug noted: super locking recall-related risk (could lock the car without opening)
- Reminder: ensure the used car is covered by the recall
- Warranty note: 7-year warranty depends on complete service history at authorized centers
Pricing / availability (used market)
ID.3
- More common in Germany (many listings mentioned)
- Example price bands:
- ~350,000 CZK incl. VAT for medium battery, often >100,000 km
- <500,000 CZK for well-equipped around ~30,000 km
- Large battery long-range:
- ~500,000+ CZK
- ~600,000 CZK for lower mileage examples
MG4
- Generally lower prices, but supply is ~1/4 of ID.3
- Example price bands:
- 51 kWh battery: many under 400,000 CZK and under 30,000 km
- Large battery versions: rare, about ~750,000 CZK for ~2-year-old cars
- Reason given: large-battery MG4 is priced higher than comparable ID.3 large-battery used units due to ID.3’s longer market depreciation cycle.
Pros & cons (as stated)
ID.3 — Pros
- More economical real-world consumption (~17–18.5 kWh/100 km vs MG4 ~18.4–20.7)
- More comfortable and quieter drive; better soundproofing
- Better overall usability/ergonomics; premium feel after facelift
- Practical features:
- HUD/AR
- wireless charging
- storage/armrest/comfort
- massage seats on some trims
- Stronger fast-charging performance (10–80% ~29 min; higher kW observed)
- Better rear-seat space
- Better trunk “small details” (12V socket, better trim, ski rack)
ID.3 — Cons
- No full single-pedal regen to stop (still brakes needed under ~10 km/h)
- Steering wheel touch/button usability issues (partly fixed in 2024 by lighting change)
- No rear A/C vents
MG4 — Pros
- Lighter; potentially more agile/faster with higher motor power feel
- Recuperation advantage: adjustable in 3 steps; supports true single-pedal to stop
- Hardware buttons preferred by some drivers
- Winter advantage: better positioned due to battery preheating before charging
- Usually cheaper purchase price on average, especially with smaller batteries
MG4 — Cons
- Less mature ride: noisier (engine/converter noise), more vibration/rumble, bouncier chassis feel
- Infotainment perceived as less capable than ID.3 (slower, fewer features/apps)
- No head-up display
- Single-zone A/C; rear comfort reduced vs ID.3
- Cost-cutting details in trunk/interior materials; less premium rear cabin feel
- Charging slower for large battery (~135 kW max; longer 10–80% time)
- Software reliability concerns and no OTA updates, requiring service center visits; recall/super-locking bug noted
Comparisons made (explicit)
Head-to-head comparisons across:
- Design (Volkswagen vs MG style)
- Interior materials and premium feel (ID.3 facelift vs MG cost-cutting)
- Driving comfort and noise
- Consumption / real-world efficiency numbers
- Charging speed and real-world 10–80% times
- Single-pedal control behavior (ID.3 limited vs MG4 full)
- Reliability and OTA support (ID.3 improving via OTA vs MG4 requiring service)
- Used market pricing and availability (ID.3 larger supply; MG4 large-battery rarity)
Overall verdict / recommendation
Recommendation: choose the Volkswagen ID.3 (especially facelifted models / larger battery where needed).
The conclusion of the video: ID.3 is the clear winner overall due to:
- more comfortable, quieter ride
- more economical consumption
- faster charging (in their tests)
- better built/premium interior (post-facelift)
- better practicality
Main trade-off: less complete single-pedal-to-stop behavior.
When MG4 might be better
- If you strongly prefer single-pedal control to a full stop
- If you want a more agile/faster feel
- If winter charging benefits matter (preheating before charging)
- If you’re targeting the cheaper smaller battery versions where used price differences are favorable
Unique points list (all distinct claims made)
- Used EV prices falling; ID.3 and MG4 are popular European competitors
- Both are Golf-sized hatchbacks with electric-platform space benefits
- Similar dimensions; ID.3 about 300 kg heavier
- Design differences: Volkswagen “cute/simple” vs MG “wild/sharper”
- Facelift differences:
- Pre-facelift ID.3 interior criticized for cheaper workmanship; facelift improved padding/stitching/soft door tops
- Display evolution: 10” → 12” → possible 13” with new infotainment system v4.0
- Software improved via OTA; max software version cited as 3.7 baseline and v4.0 future
- 2024 fix for unlit volume/temperature touch buttons
- ID.3 interior strengths:
- clean minimal button approach
- driver display + large infotainment
- large AR HUD
- wireless charging
- lots of knee room
- organizer mesh, USB-C
- ID.3 comfort notes:
- massage seats (rare)
- seat firmness specifics
- good visibility (including A-pillar window)
- higher stance
- ID.3 disadvantages:
- touch steering wheel responsiveness issues
- no full single-pedal-to-stop (brakes required below ~10 km/h)
- no rear A/C vents
- MG4 interior strengths:
- clean concept with minimal buttons
- physical button preference
- recuperation mapping emphasis
- MG4 disadvantages:
- no HUD/AR
- infotainment fewer features (no apps/games/app store)
- single-zone A/C; reduced rear comfort
- rear cabin less premium (hard plastics)
- ergonomics knee-contact issue
- charging slower on large battery (~135 kW max; longer 10–80%)
- software reliability concerns and no OTA
- super-locking recall-related bug
- MG4 rear seat: less space than ID.3, but still good; no rear armrest/vents; USB-A only; small floor step
- Trunk details:
- 385 L (ID.3) vs 363 L (MG4)
- both lack front trunk; cable storage under false floor
- ID.3 adds 12V socket, better trim, easier handling, two handles vs one, integrated ski rack
- MG4 lacks 12V socket, less protective coatings, single plate handle, no ski rack
- Efficiency:
- ID.3 ~18.5 vs MG4 ~20.7 kWh/100 km initially
- later MG4 ~18.4 vs ID.3 ~17.2
- Driving impressions:
- ID.3: comfortable/quiet, good soundproofing, driver-friendly ergonomics
- MG4: noisier and more vibrating; bouncier chassis feel; “tram-like” rear sensation
- Range:
- ID.3 largest battery: ~400 km highway / 500 km combined
- ID.3 medium battery: ~300 km highway / 380 km combined
- MG4: ~10% less due to slightly higher consumption
- Charging:
- ID.3: promised 170 kW, achieved ~185 kW; 10–80% ~29 min
- MG4 large battery: ~135 kW max; ~10 minutes longer 10–80%
- note that smaller batteries can charge around ~31 min (ID.3 58 kWh) and ~35 min for both
- Slow charging note: both support 3-phase with 11 kW at home overnight
- Winter caveat:
- ID.3 lacked active preheating before charging until 2023
- MG4 has it, improving winter charging comparability
- Reliability details:
- ID.3: OTA improvements; check software 3.7; noted grounding failure during charging; logo light cover defect
- MG4: phantom faults, freezing, touchscreen restart issues; no OTA; recall/super-locking bug; warranty depends on service history
- Pricing:
- ID.3 medium battery: ~350k CZK VAT incl. (often high mileage), ~<500k around 30k km
- ID.3 large battery: typically ~500k–600k+
- MG4 smaller battery: many under 400k
- MG4 large battery rarity: ~750k around ~2 years old
- Final conclusion: ID.3 wins on comfort, economy, charging, and premium interior; MG4 offers agility and full single-pedal-to-stop plus better value on smaller batteries
Speakers / roles
- Main narrator (Martin implied): frames comparison and provides most evaluation content (interior, trunk, driving, consumption, charging, reliability, pricing)
- Second speaker (Láďa): specifically contributes real-world consumption numbers during the drive comparison (ID.3 ~18.5 vs MG4 ~20.7; later ~17.2 vs ~18.4)