Проверяю десерты в самой ДОРОГОЙ кофейне Москвы – КОФЕМАНИИ

Product reviewed

Desserts and coffee experience at “Coffee Mania” (Москва), described by the reviewer as “the most expensive coffee shop in Moscow.”

Key points & unique features (desserts)

General positioning

• Coffee Mania is associated with very high prices (the same pricing level is reflected in dessert items as well).

“Belchik rating” context

• The reviewer uses a subjective “Belchik” indicator for dessert level.
• This indicator is independent, and the restaurant cannot influence it.

Staff / user experience

• A charming waitress helped with recommendations.
• Service felt unobtrusive.
• The waiter described desserts in detail.

Tasting strategy

• The reviewer typically tastes ~7 items to avoid “mixed flavors” and heaviness—and follows the same approach here.

Price level across desserts

• Multiple desserts are repeatedly listed at ~610 rubles, even for small portions such as 60g / 80g / 100g.

Dessert highlights (liked)

• “Fico” (750 rubles)

  • Vegan-leaning profile: coconut + raspberry gel
  • Described as delicate and clearly identifiable
  • Liked the taste, but called it “just okay” for the price
  • Didn’t realize it was vegan beforehand

• French cake / apple dessert (150g, 610 rubles)

  • Very light and fresh
  • Notes of apples and hazelnut dacquoise
  • Compared to a better version of an old “student McCafé apple cake”
  • Called an “exquisite charlotte for gourmets”

• “Company” (coffee renga / crunch dessert, 100g, 610 rubles)

  • Major standout: extreme crunch, compared to Oreo-style crunch with a “liquid nut core”
  • Flavor described as coffee + hazelnut crunch + coffee/chocolate cream
  • Balance: not cloying and not overly sweet
  • Reviewer calls it top/popular (waiter’s claim)

• “Sakha” (60g, 610 rubles, sugar-free)

  • Described as unusual, weightless, tender
  • Pineapple + tarragon confiture
  • Lime/lemon mousse
  • Slightly medicinal aftertaste (not fully liked)
  • Feels more suited to tea than coffee
  • Works as a sweet after a heavy meal

• “Onyx” (80g, 610 rubles)

  • Visual “pebble/ocean” look
  • Contains sorrel & aloe filling and mousse
  • Reviewer liked: filling and a fresh summer taste, plus crunch from a thin chocolate layer
  • Critique: mousse + filling pairing felt slightly off (mousse too fatty)

• Honey-ginger mousse dessert (590 rubles, 70g)

  • Strong “medicinal/tea when sick” association due to honey + ginger
  • Reviewer likes the ginger punch
  • Textures praised: ginger provides crunch
  • Enjoyed the mousse most when taken separately from the ginger component

• “Rake cake” / honey-caramel cake with prunes (price not clearly stated in the text)

  • Described as an improved “Golden Key”-style cake
  • Called wonderful, tender, enveloping, with a childhood taste feel
  • Sweet but not too sweet, with prunes adding a twist
  • Strong positive: potentially the best “homey” dessert mentioned

Negative / mixed dessert experiences

• Reheated pear caramel puff pastry (590 rubles, 70g)

  • Strong dislike: it appears reheated
  • Result: oily dough and worse-than-fresh taste
  • Compared to reheating an almond croissant from a grocery store—reviewer says it shouldn’t be done

• “Fico” again (750 rubles)

  • Liked overall, but still considered not worth 750 rubles (“just okay”)

• “Onyx” again

  • Liked filling and crunch
  • Mousse pairing could be lighter

Coffee experience (context, used to contrast desserts)

Coffee quality criticism (major negative)

• Cappuccino / filter coffee described as disgusting / bad
  • Very bitter
  • Possible causes suggested: bean choice (robusta suspicion) and/or poor extraction / over-pressing (or problematic Arabica)
• Filter coffee specifically described as “completely empty” (no real flavor)

But barista looks skilled

• The reviewer says baristas show good technique and perform impressive latte art
• However, despite the skill, the drinks tasted poor

Conclusion on coffee

• Coffee is framed as a weak point
• Reviewer implies desserts are where Coffee Mania is worth it

Pros (as stated)

• Dessert variety with a strong textural focus (crunch, lightness, mousse layering)
• Desserts are not overly sweet—more about the true product taste
• Helpful staff and good guidance
• Overall dessert experience is mostly positive, with many small/tiny portions that feel not heavy

Cons (as stated)

• Very high pricing for small portions (repeated examples around 590–610 rubles)
• Coffee quality inconsistency / poor taste in at least one order
• Some desserts have off flavors or aftertastes
  • e.g., medicinal aftertaste for one item
  • mousse pairing mismatch for another
• One pastry appears to have been reheated, causing poor texture and an oily result

Comparisons to similar products / brands

• Starbucks: reviewer initially expected Coffee Mania to be “Starbucks, but more expensive”
• Other roasters: reviewer suggests looking at SFER Coffee / Skuratov for better beans
• McCafé apple cake memory: French apple dessert compared to an older McCafé apple cake (but improved)
• Oreo comparison: “Company” crunch compared to Oreo
• Golden Key comparison: honey-caramel + prunes cake compared to Golden Key, described as more tender

Pricing & numerical details mentioned (key ones)

• Coffee Mania coffee
  • Small cappuccino: 410 rubles
  • Cappuccino (350 ml, “Grande”): 590 rubles
  • Filter coffee: 490 rubles
• Breakfast item mentioned
  • Syrniki: ~700 rubles (breakfast only until 2:00 pm)
• Dessert prices (mostly)
  • ~610 rubles repeatedly for ~60g–100g desserts
  • “Fico”: 750 rubles
  • Reheated pear puff pastry: 590 rubles
  • Honey-ginger mousse: 590 rubles

Verdict / recommendation (based on the video)

• Strong recommendation for desserts, especially for those who like:
  • coffee-style desserts
  • textural desserts (crunch)
  • not-too-sweet flavors
• Caution about coffee: reviewer recommends desserts “only with tea”, implying coffee orders may disappoint.
• Overall impression: mostly positive dessert lineup, with misses largely tied to pairing/aftertaste or reheated pastry quality.

Speaker-specific notes

Single main speaker: Katerina Belchik, who provides:

• Most tasting observations (desserts and coffee)
• Strong opinions on:
  • pricing
  • texture
  • sweetness level
  • staff service
  • coffee failure
• Final take: desserts > coffee, with tea pairing emphasized