Video summary

How I find institutional supply & demand zones with 99% ACCURACY (copy me)

Main summary

Key takeaways

Finance

Finance-focused Summary (Institutional Supply/Demand Zones via Volume Profile + “Market Rhythm”)

Core claims / what the method is supposed to do

  • The video argues that institutional supply and demand zones are more reliable than traditional, visually-drawn support/resistance.
  • Rationale: institutions “place orders where liquidity is hiding,” which the trader can detect using volume by price.
  • The zones are claimed to be “permanent”—once identified, price is expected to react accurately when revisiting those levels in the future.

Instruments / tickers mentioned

  • ES (E-mini S&P 500 futures) — used as the example instrument throughout.
  • TradingView — charting software / platform.
  • No other tickers/ETFs/bonds/crypto are mentioned.

Key tools / indicators mentioned (Volume Profile)

  • VRVP: Visible Range Volume Profile
  • SVP: Session Volume Profile

Method basis

  • Volume profile shows volume by price (not over time), used to infer where liquidity and participation concentrate.
  • Multiple sessions with heavy volume stacked at the same price implies institutions are likely active there.
  • Point of Control (PC) on SVP is described as the highest volume point for the day.

Step-by-step framework (explicit methodology)

Step 1 — Add volume profile indicators (TradingView, 1-hour chart)

  1. Start from a blank TradingView chart on the 1-hour timeframe.
  2. Add:
    • VRVP
      • Set row size: 24 → 200
      • (Optional) set color to gray
    • SVP
      • Set row size: 24 → 100
  3. Ensure the chart includes:
    • The most recent price range
    • “The last couple of days” (not much older), so VRVP reflects relevant visible action.

Step 2 — Find the “anchor point” (main institutional level)

Two requirements must be met:

1) SVP requirement (Point of Control alignment) - Identify the black horizontal PC lines. - Look for two or more PCs around the same level across days (repeated testing suggests importance to institutions).

2) VRVP requirement (High volume node alignment) - Identify high volume nodes (largest volume clusters) on VRVP. - Choose a high-volume node that is horizontally aligned with two or more PCs.

How to mark it

  • Use the rectangle tool.
  • Extend left/right using settings that “extend to both the left and the right.”
  • Cover the area where the volume tapers off (not too thin, not too wide).
  • Example: on ES, the anchor width is described as about “10 points.”

Step 3 — Mark additional levels using “market rhythm” (after removing profiles)

  • After the anchor is found, the video claims the main input shifts away from profiles and toward “market rhythm” / liquidity pockets.
  • Remove VRVP and SVP from the chart (described as “shovels we use to dig”).

Claimed spacing rule (ES)

  • Liquidity pockets appear at increments of typically every 20 to 30 points.

How to place the next levels

  • Copy/paste the anchor level 20–30 points above and below iteratively.
  • Confirmation cue: look for strong rejections on both sides near the level (sharp bounces).

Special case

  • For all-time highs, project another 20–30 points above as additional levels (assuming similar market pace).

Trading framework referenced (execution approach)

  • The video describes level-to-level trading:
    • Enter at one level
    • Exit at a target level
    • Repeat this process continuously.
  • An entry model is referenced:
    • LCE method (Level Confirmation and Execution)
    • Used to decide precise entry points and direction to improve win rate and risk/reward
    • A separate video is referenced for LCE details.

Key numbers / parameters explicitly stated

  • Timeframe: 1 hour
  • Indicator settings:
    • VRVP row size: 24 → 200
    • SVP row size: 24 → 100
  • Data window: use “last couple of days” (avoid much older data)
  • ES-specific spacing: liquidity pocket step = 20 to 30 points
  • Example anchor size on ES: about 10 points width
  • Cadence: build a chain by copying levels and adding levels using 20–30 point spacing

Recommendations / cautions / disclosures

  • No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer is included in the provided subtitles.
  • The video implies a key caution by contrast:
    • Avoid marking zones at random
    • Avoid treating zones as generic, oversized support/resistance
    • The video frames random/oversimplified marking as inconsistent and “bound to fail.”
  • The method is presented as more consistent and repeatable than discretionary guessing.

Presenter / sources

  • Presenter: video speaker (name not provided in the subtitles)
  • Tools/platform mentioned: TradingView (for VRVP/SVP indicators)

Original video