Naza: The Real Story | Full Movie | Dubbed in 8 Languages, Subtitles in 38

Summary

The documentary presents the Gaza war through interviews with Israeli military officers, commanders, reservists, and soldiers. Its central argument is that Hamas deliberately operated in civilian areas, using civilian clothing, homes, and humanitarian sites to conceal fighters and military infrastructure. The film contrasts these accounts with what it describes as misleading narratives produced from afar.

Interviewees recount finding weapons, ammunition, and explosives in homes, including children’s rooms. They also describe tunnels or combat facilities beneath kindergartens, schools, mosques, and hospitals. According to the speakers, Hamas fighters often removed their uniforms, moved among civilians unarmed, and retrieved weapons when preparing to fight. The film further alleges that Hamas used civilians to observe Israeli positions, obstructed evacuations, and took control of aid convoys and supplies.

The speakers describe Israeli targeting rules and procedures that they say were designed to limit civilian harm. According to their accounts, sensitive sites were marked in military systems, strikes near them required additional approvals and legal review, and forces sometimes delayed or abandoned attacks because of risks to civilians or hostages. They also describe efforts to screen people in shelters and recount difficult decisions when individuals approached military positions. Several interviewees say they did not personally witness Israeli forces deliberately firing on civilians. These are their testimonies, not independently established findings in the film.

On humanitarian conditions, interviewees say they saw substantial food supplies and accuse Hamas of diverting aid. One speaker says he did not encounter hunger in the areas where he served. The documentary also claims that Israel supplied medical equipment and medicines, including medication intended for hostages, while noting that interviewees could not confirm whether the hostages received those medicines.

The film concludes that Hamas’s military presence in civilian spaces and its ideology make the conflict difficult to resolve. It argues that the organization would rebuild if it remained in Gaza. The account is overwhelmingly from the Israeli military perspective: the subtitles provide no Palestinian civilian interviews or substantial opposing account, and the claims presented are not independently assessed within the film.

Presenters and Contributors

No names are given in the subtitles. Contributors include unnamed Israeli military officers and commanders, intelligence and legal personnel, reservists, and soldiers.