🧨Всё ВЫНОСЯТ вхлам: так Украина НЕ ПРОТЯНЕТ И МЕСЯЦА! Копатько.

Overview

The speaker argues that Ukraine’s leadership and the political course since the Maidan era are fundamentally responsible for the current war outcome. They also claim that recent strikes on Western-linked infrastructure show the conflict is being driven toward total destruction rather than resolution.

Key Arguments

Destruction of “American brand” infrastructure

The speaker cites recent attacks affecting warehouses, enterprises, and especially communications infrastructure/data centers. They argue that these facilities—such as servers, network equipment, cabling, and communications systems—are extremely expensive and represent a major catastrophe.

They contrast this with targets that are described as more symbolic (e.g., branded sites like McDonald’s/Coca‑Cola).

“Zelensky as either fool or enemy”

Based on the scale and character of what is being destroyed, the speaker claims it implies either:

• gross incompetence, or
• deliberate sabotage by internal actors.

They ultimately frame Zelensky as the “continuation” of earlier political decisions.

Continuity from Maidan to 2022

The speaker presents Zelensky as inheriting a chain of events beginning with the:

• First Maidan (2004)
• Second Maidan (2013)

…culminating in 2022, arguing that the same underlying “common cause” persisted.

They add that many people (and elites) moved between political lines, calling this duplicity corrosive to public trust.

Erosion of trust and impunity

The speaker claims society no longer trusts those in power due to:

• unaccountability
• corruption allegations
• a sense that ordinary people are sacrificed, while elites can avoid consequences

Elections treated as a sham / not a real remedy

They argue that discussing elections is unrealistic or illegitimate under wartime conditions. They also claim the political actors lack the unity and legitimacy required for real change.

They reference Yulia Mendel (and Tucker Carlson) and contend that Mendel’s remarks reflect divisions within circles around Zelensky.

External control and internal fragmentation

The speaker claims Ukraine’s internal conflict is effectively managed under external influence, and that society fears prolonged civil conflict.

They suggest the country is not unified, making internal resolution difficult even if individuals change.

Recurrent failure of peace attempts

They review why negotiations and ceasefire efforts failed, citing:

• Minsk (called sabotage for years)
• Istanbul

They also argue that broader Western political actions—such as NATO expansion and militarization steps in nearby countries—made peace harder.

They further claim that even potential Trump-era momentum did not translate into a treaty.

Sanctions and escalation continue

The speaker predicts escalation rather than stabilization, asserting that sanctions and additional military supply/imports are part of a trajectory likely to continue destroying Ukraine.

Moscow meeting speculation

The speaker discusses a scenario in which negotiations are brokered externally—potentially with Trump mediating and meetings possibly involving Zelensky and Putin—and suggests agreements could be possible.

However, they conclude that currently there is:

• too little trust
• too much inertia toward war escalation

Presenters / Contributors

• Speaker/host: “Копатько.” (shown in the title)
• Referenced individuals:
  • Volodymyr Zelensky
  • Valeriy “Zaluzhny” (Zaluzhny)
  • Kirill Budanov
  • Yulia Mendel
  • Petro Poroshenko
  • Viktor Yanukovych
  • Yulia Tymoshenko
  • Tucker Carlson
  • Donald Trump
  • Vladimir Putin
  • Koch / Alfred Koch
  • Evgeny Eduardovich (as referenced)
  • Rubio (Marco Rubio)
  • Biden
  • Viktor Orbán (Orban)
  • Azov soldiers (collective reference)
  • Mendel’s interview audiences and political “Europe” circle