Video summary

ICT Mentorship Core Content - Month 1 - Equilibrium Vs. Discount

Main summary

Key takeaways

Educational

Main ideas & concepts

  • Purpose of the installment (Month 1, installment 4): Build a foundation for understanding equilibrium vs. discount in trading, especially for bullish/long scenarios.
  • Why it may feel “elementary” at first: Even if concepts sound basic, the speaker promises more depth later in the mentorship as terminology gets refined.
  • Core trading premise:
    • Traders should focus on price alone (open/high/low/close) to judge market direction, entries/exits, and context.
    • Indicators (including Fibonacci) don’t have “magic” by themselves; Fibonacci is used mainly to illustrate where equilibrium lies within price swings.
  • Institutional/order-flow framing:
    • Price is moved by larger participants (the speaker repeatedly frames this as banks / institutional money).
    • Markets are allowed to rise when these players want to profit; they typically move price via displacement, accumulate positions, and target areas where stops/liquidity exist.

Key methodology: “Equilibrium → Discount → Long context”

A step-by-step process for determining valuation context on the daily chart; not a direct entry-signal system yet.

1) Identify the relevant price structure (daily chart context)

  • Use a daily chart initially for foundation (not lower timeframes).
  • Look for the largest/most meaningful price ranges recently traded (the “present market range” concept).
  • Determine the impulsive price leg (the strong move away from a prior level).

2) Define an “impulsive price swing” (displacement)

  • An impulsive price swing is the aggressive move from a low to a high (or vice versa), suggesting displacement by large participants.
  • In the bullish case: identify impulse upward, then wait for the pullback.

3) Wait for a valid swing high using a “4-candle” rule

After price makes an impulse upward:

  • From the moment price makes a low and starts rallying:
    • Identify the first moment a swing high forms.
    • Require a minimum of 4 candles to confirm the swing high structure:
      • 1 candle to the left
      • 1 candle in the center (the highest candle)
      • 1 candle to the right that is lower
  • Then require that the fourth candle turns downward to confirm the setup is pulling back.

4) Mark equilibrium (the “fair value” level)

  • Use Fibonacci from the impulse swing low → impulse swing high.
  • Equilibrium = the 50% retracement level.
  • Interpretation:
    • At equilibrium: fair market value (not premium, not truly discounted).
    • Below equilibrium: discount.

5) Determine market condition: premium vs. discount

  • For longs: the market must be bullish in context, then you want price to return to:
    • Equilibrium (50%) first
    • Then ideally go below equilibrium into discount
  • Discount thresholds (optimal trade entry zone):
    • Emphasis is on buying most strongly when price reaches approximately 62% to 70.5%, and possibly around 79% (described as a sweet spot/deep discount/optimal trade entry).
  • General rule given:
    • Price below 50% = discount
    • Deeper discount (62–79 zone) = higher probability bullishness if the broader context is bullish.

6) Only after discount is reached, go to lower timeframes for execution

  • The speaker explicitly says this video provides context, not direct entry signals.
  • Once daily context indicates discount, then lower timeframes are used to hunt for buying opportunities (signals come later/in other videos).

Liquidity, stop runs, and why discount can trigger explosive upside

The speaker links discount behavior to liquidity engineering:

  • Banks/large players often push price below prior lows to run stops (buy-side and sell-side liquidity depending on direction).
  • After stops/liquidity are taken, price often reverses aggressively as the institution accumulates and targets the next liquidity pool (commonly old highs / equal highs).

Turtle soup concept (false breakout/run on stops)

  • If a bullish market sweeps an old low and then rejects, it can resemble a turtle soup false breakdown pattern.
  • In this framework, such sweeps are treated as stop raids that set up discounted buying conditions.

How price progression is expected to behave (bullish case)

A bullish scenario often follows this rhythm:

  1. Impulsive move up
  2. Retracement to equilibrium
  3. Further fall into discount (below equilibrium)
  4. Quick rejection / explosive rally upward
  5. Potential revisit of equilibrium later, then another expansion

Practical examples / benchmarks the speaker gives

Timing/frequency (daily chart)

  • Setups are described as relatively infrequent: roughly about one per week on a daily chart.

Expected targets

  • Upside expansions often aim for:
    • old highs
    • equal highs
    • and nearby liquidity pools

Profit-taking logic (general)

  • Exiting around old highs/equal highs once buy-side liquidation/stop-driven expansion occurs.
  • Avoid greed (sell when objectives are met rather than overextending).

Methodological principles emphasized

  • Indicator caution:
    • Fibonacci is used to visualize equilibrium/discount, not because it predicts magically.
    • Indicators are historical math; they shouldn’t replace price-action foundations.
  • High probability comes from “valuation” alignment:
    • Bullish longs work best when:
      • market structure is bullish (context),
      • price is in discount,
      • then execution can incorporate tools like:
        • order blocks
        • mitigation blocks
        • breakers
        • turtle soups
        • optimal trade entry (62–79 zone)

What the speaker says not to do

  • Don’t trade purely because price touches 50% equilibrium.
  • Don’t rush trades—especially on daily context—until the structure confirms and price reaches the appropriate valuation (ideally discount/deeper discount).
  • Don’t assume everything works perfectly:
    • Losses happen, and price may not respond exactly as expected.

Sources / speakers featured

  • Speaker: Michael (referred to repeatedly as “Michael” during instruction).

Original video