💥Le PLAN de MACRON pour garder le POUVOIR après 2027 [Le OFF]

Overview

The video argues that Emmanuel Macron is building a “deep state” to preserve influence and block a political shift after the 2027 election. The speaker claims Macron has systematically “parachuted” loyal ministers and senior officials into key “counter-power” institutions—often via appointments described by the narrator as covert, biased, or even illegal. The goal, as presented, is that any incoming opposition president would face institutional sabotage across areas such as legality, budgeting, media oversight, and regulatory control.

Core claim: a long-term institutional lock before 2027

• The narrator argues that replacing Macron in 2027 would “change almost nothing” because major constitutional and regulatory levers are allegedly secured in advance.
• The strategy is described as an administrative “backup citadel” (i.e., a deep state): even if parliament and elections change political direction, entrenched bodies could slow, censor, or paralyze reforms.

The Constitutional Council: appointments meant to freeze constitutional reforms

A major portion of the video focuses on the Constitutional Council, portrayed as a mechanism that can veto or paralyze laws through constitutional interpretation—likened to a “weapon of mass paralysis.”

Véronique Malbec (as central figure)

The video highlights Véronique Malbec, whom the narrator portrays as having facilitated the burial of a scandal involving Richard Ferrand. It references the Brittany mutuals affair, claiming the matter was closed and later extinguished without a ruling.

The narrator alleges Malbec’s career culminated in a 9-year appointment to the Constitutional Council:

• Appointed by Richard Ferrand via Article 56 on Feb. 23, 2022
• Confirmation process: described as approved by 27 votes vs 11
• Swearing-in: March 14, 2022

Ferrand’s later bid to lead the Council

The video claims Ferrand’s later attempt to become President of the Constitutional Council (due around Feb. 2025) was politically contentious:

• The video alleges Ferrand was massively rejected by parliamentary committees and came close to failing the 3/5 “qualified majority” threshold.
• It alleges National Rally deputies abstained collectively, allowing the appointment to pass by one vote.
• It frames this as a possible conflict of interest connected to issues relevant to Marine Le Pen’s legal situation, mentioning a QPC about ineligibility as an early matter Ferrand could preside over.

Courts of Auditors, Bank of France, and Council of State: “financial and legal levers”

The narrator extends the “lock” argument to other institutions.

1) Court of Auditors (Cour des comptes)

The video claims:

• Amélie de Montchalin would be parachuted to lead the Court of Auditors (presented as long-term power).
• The arrangement is framed as a major conflict of interest because the video alleges she had budget-related responsibilities shortly beforehand (including shaping or negotiating budgets).
• A legal challenge by the Anticor association is said to have failed due to narrow standing requirements (“lack of direct interest”), preventing substantive review of the conflict.

2) Bank of France

The video portrays the governorship as a crucial choke point because it participates in euro-area monetary policy and banking/financial oversight:

• The video alleges François Villeroy de Galhau announced an “unprecedented” early departure, creating a vacancy.
• The successor Emmanuel Moulin is described as Macron’s close operator, with prior key roles in the Elysée and finance apparatus.
• It claims the appointment succeeded despite a parliamentary rejection described as 46–25, attributed to procedural/arithmetic mechanisms and backroom bargaining to secure qualified majorities.
• The video adds another alleged scandal: confidential notes allegedly prepared to support Moulin’s parliamentary hearing, tied to the departing governor’s ethical breach.
• It further alleges Nicolas Sarkozy intervened politically to secure Moulin’s vote.

3) Council of State

The video claims the Council of State is pivotal because it:

• advises government legislation before it reaches parliament, and
• serves as the supreme administrative judge that can validate or annul executive measures.

It identifies Marc Guillaume as the figure who allegedly secures this position and claims:

• managing controversies around the appointment (including claims of sexist remarks and ties to a pedophilia scandal),
• and that Guillaume was placed in “exile” to defuse public reaction before later becoming Vice-President of the Council of State—presented as effectively running the presidency.

Media and opinion control: ARCOM and other regulatory bodies

The video argues that ARCOM can discipline media ecosystems even if it cannot directly repeal laws. It portrays ARCOM as able to:

• impose constraints on broadcasters,
• open procedures that create legal/media pressure,
• interpret pluralism in ways that can effectively bring down marginal or new outlets.

It also identifies Martin Adjar (name appears variably in subtitles) as a long-lasting regulator whose mandate is said to be protected from political removal far beyond normal electoral cycles.

Energy, nuclear, and electricity markets: regulators that can block transitions

The video argues regulators can slow or block major transitions.

Nuclear-related authorities

• SNR (described in the video as created from an ASN/IRSN merger) is portrayed as capable of suspending reactor operations and stopping approval for new plants.
• The narrator claims Pierre-Marie Abadie is placed to run it, alleging a conflict of interest due to his prior role in designing defended nuclear waste burial projects (Andra/Cigéo context).
• It argues such roles are protected by long, hard-to-remove mandates.

Electricity-related authorities

• The video discusses CRE (energy regulation) and RTE (grid operator), arguing they cannot directly negate laws but can paralyze the system through regulatory choices and technical/investment decisions.
• The narrator describes appointments designed to align with a “Brussels doctrine” and restrict change.

“Last part”: a broader pattern of patronage jobs and conflicts

The speaker closes by arguing that beyond “high constitutional” locks, Macron’s network allegedly repurposed state administration into a “recycling machine” for loyal figures.

Examples presented include:

• Christophe Castaner moving into major transport/port leadership roles and later a corporate advisory role involving a Chinese fashion brand—framed by the video as hypocrisy and cronyism.
• Frédéric Descrosill allegedly appointed to the Court of Auditors and then made ineligible by the Constitutional Council for campaign account issues.
• Anne Lorquetalo (named as ONF/forestry-related figure) depicted as heading ONF while previously involved with or benefiting from a timber lobbying structure.
• The narrator also describes “thematic embassies” and created roles for defeated allies, portraying them as “bogus jobs” inconsistent with expertise and used to reward political losses.

Purpose and “deep state” conspiracy theory

The video acknowledges that opponents may say “it has always been like that,” but insists Macron goes further by structurally locking “counter-powers”:

• It claims key terms extend well beyond 2027 (including Constitutional Council members, Court of Auditors, and regulators).
• The intended result, according to the narrator, is to reduce the practical impact of universal suffrage: the public can vote in 2027, but legality, finance, media, and nuclear levers remain controlled by Macron’s inner circle.

The speaker’s personal theory:

• Macron is allegedly preparing a Medvedev-style scenario—causing or managing disorder so he can return as a “savior” around 2032.
• The entire network is framed as a “deep state” designed to “organize chaos administratively.”

---

Presenters or contributors (as named in the subtitles)

• Emmanuel Macron
• Véronique Malbec
• Richard Ferrand
• Gabriel Attal
• Édouard Philippe
• Laurent Fabius
• Aurélie Bretonneau (spelled “Bretonau/Bretonneau” in subtitles)
• Amélie de Montchalin
• François Villeroy de Galhau
• Emmanuel Moulin
• Marc Guillaume (again)
• Martin Adjar / Martin Adajari / Martin Hedari (ARCOM figure; name appears variably)
• Pierre-Marie Abadie
• Emmanuel Vargon
• Émilie Piette
• Nicolas Sarkozy
• Philippe Brun
• François Noël Buffet
• Marine Le Pen
• Christophe Castaner
• Frédéric Descrosill
• Anne Lorcatolo / Lorquetalo (ONF/forestry-related figure)
• Clément Beaune (subtitle shows “Clément Bone”)
• Bruno Bonel
• Barbara Pompili
• Clara Chappaz (subtitle shows “Clara Chapas”)
• Martin Jarry
• Éric Dupont-Moretti
• Didier Tourniveau (subtitle contains “Didier Truth”; name appears garbled)
• Didier Truth (as appears)
• Anticor (association; not a person, but a contributor mentioned)
• La France insoumise
• Rassemblement national
• Médiapart
• La République en Marche (LREM)
• Le Canard enchaîné

Institutions and regulatory bodies mentioned

• ARCOM
• SNR
• ASN / IRSN (referenced via the merger)
• Cour des comptes / Court of Auditors
• Conseil d’État / Council of State
• Conseil constitutionnel / Constitutional Council
• Cour de cassation / Court of Cassation

(Note: “CJCE?” is referenced as unclear/omitted unless explicitly named.)