A beginner's guide to Critical Literary Analysis

Main Ideas, Concepts, and Lessons

• Critical literary analysis (goal + payoff)

  • Literary analysis is presented as a way to build critical thinking and analytical skills.
  • It also helps you create and defend a clear argument.
  • The creator argues that many artists/art educators are “pretentious” about teaching, so beginners are often left out—this video aims to make the process accessible.

• What literary analysis is (definition)

  • Literary analysis = examination and evaluation of a literary work.
  • It must include:
    • More than summary of the story
    • An argument you want to make about the text, supported by evidence

• What an “argument” means in literary analysis

  • Not shouting opinions—an argument is the main claim/point you’re trying to prove.
  • You must be able to convince others, meaning you need evidence from the text.

• Five common types of arguments

  1. Close reading / formalist argument
     • Focus on technical/textual details: word choice, phrasing, implications, structure of dialogue, etc.
     • Also can include attention to art/visual design choices in visual media (the video references examples like character coats/designs).
  2. Applied reading argument
     • More subjective: connects the text to the reader’s own experiences.
     • A proper applied reading argument requires specific moments you personally relate to, plus explanation and examples.
  3. Comparative / synergistic argument
     • Compare the target text with other texts.
     • Best when there are strong connecting threads (shared themes, style, or authorial messages).
     • Can argue texts are similar, different, or both (carefully).
  4. Textual / historical argument
     • Looks at the historical/social context influencing the text.
     • Especially useful for works whose language/settings/themes differ from modern conventions.
  5. Theoretical argument
     • Uses a theory to interpret the text, usually by applying a critical lens.

• Critical lenses (definition + examples)

  • A critical lens is a way of focusing on style choices, plot devices, and character interactions to reveal how they express a theme.
  • The video lists four common lenses:
    • Psychoanalytic: character emotional/mental states
    • Feminist: women’s experiences
    • Marxist: socioeconomic issues; the text as a product of society
    • Queer: queer identities and “queering” of actions/speech
  • Reminder: there are many other lenses, but these are the ones emphasized today.
  • The lens you pick should match the evidence you want to examine (the video gives examples: anti-war via psychoanalytic; anti-war via Marxist or fatalist as alternatives).

Key takeaway: Build analysis around a defensible claim, then support it with evidence—using the lens/type of argument that best fits what you’re trying to prove.

---

Step-by-Step Methodology (How to Put It All Together)

1) Gather evidence

• First read-through (no annotations)

  • Read the entire text at least once without annotating.
  • Use this pass to:
    • Understand the whole work
    • Ask questions
    • Note initial theories as they come up

• Second read-through (annotate with themes/lenses)

  • Reread with your chosen:
    • themes
    • lenses
  • Annotate while reading.
  • During annotation, create supporting organizational materials such as:
    • An outline/notes of important characters
    • A notes app, notebook, or sticky notes to track ideas and evidence

2) Create your argument (after evidence is collected)

Include the following:

• Mention text type and genre

  • Example categories: play, novel, poem; sci-fi, fantasy, thriller, etc.
  • Explain how the text follows conventions or bends/ignores them.

• Identify important characters

  • Provide an outline of key characters and their roles.

• Outline important plot and/or themes

  • Include:
    • Plot points or thematic developments
    • A review of the themes you’ll discuss

• Connect symbols to those themes

  • Identify symbols representing the themes and discuss how they function.

• Mention overall structure

  • Comment on the text’s overall structure (how it’s organized/paced).

---

Example Walkthrough: “Edward the Emu” Analysis

Why this example is used

• The video chooses a short children’s story (“Edward the Emu”) because:
  • It’s easy to follow
  • It has a clear underlying theme
  • It demonstrates that children’s literature can be profound and analyzable

Chosen approach for the example

• Theme focus: identity, acceptance, belonging
• Method/lens:
  • Psychoanalytic lens (focus on Edward’s emotional/mental state)
  • A bit of formalist argument (attention to textual/expressive choices)

Key evidence the narrator points to (plot moments)

• Edward is unhappy as an emu in the zoo enclosure.
• He repeatedly changes identity by pretending/acting as other animals based on what others say is “best”:
  • He hears seals are best → becomes a seal for a day
  • He hears lions are best → becomes a lion for a day
  • He hears snakes are best → becomes a snake for a day
• The video claims the deeper issue is:
  • Edward’s behavior is driven by how others perceive/like him, not just boredom.
• When Edward hears “the Emu is best”:
  • He becomes ecstatic and uses exclamative language.
  • He smiles with an open mouth (treated as expressive/textual evidence).
  • He returns to the emu enclosure.
• The new emu, Eda, affirms his identity:
  • She tells him he is the best thing she’s seen since arriving.

Central interpretation (lesson from the story)

• Acceptance/belonging means accepting Edward as himself, not as “seal/lion/snake Edward.”
• The story’s message:
  • Edward can’t change what he fundamentally is (an emu), even if he tries to “contort” into other identities.
  • Eventually he finds belonging through people who accept him for his true identity.
• Importantly, the narrator emphasizes:
  • Edward doesn’t stop caring what others think entirely.
  • Instead, he finds people who truly like him as he is, so he no longer needs to pretend.

Queer lens addition (invited extension)

• The narrator suggests that reading the story through a queer lens could add another layer:
  • Because identity acceptance and belonging can be especially difficult for queer people.
• They encourage viewers to try it and comment ideas.

---

Speaker(s) / Sources Featured

• Speaker/creator: “Moon” (the video’s host/author of the lesson)
• Texts referenced as examples within the video:
  • “Little Red Riding Hood” (used to illustrate types of arguments)
  • “No Longer Human” (mentioned in relation to applied reading/relatability via the character Yū)
  • “Edward the Emu” (the main example text analyzed)
  • References also mentioned earlier in the clip (contextual examples, not fully quoted):
    • “the coat” (coat-related theory example)
    • “bngo tray dogs” (Bungo Stray Dogs referenced)
    • A “no longer human” video (as a prior source by the same creator)
• No other distinct speakers are clearly identified in the subtitles.