Tanchjim Bunny, Si Kelinci Lucu Penantang IEM 300-ribuan!

Product Reviewed

Tanchjim/Tanjim Bunny (budget dynamic-driver IEM) — positioned around ~Rp 300,000, featuring a cute/exclusive Bunny-themed design and a neutral-to-slightly-bright tuning approach.

Main Features / Specs Mentioned

• Driver tech: “low distortion wave guide” + double chamber dynamic driver
• Sound/drive requirements:
  • Impedance: 30Ω
  • Sensitivity: 123 dB
  • Described as easy to drive from phones (HP) and DAPs
• Models/variants:
  • 3.5mm version (the one reviewed)
  • DSP version with USB Type-C
    • Said to boost treble/high frequencies for a brighter sound
    • Adjustable via app/EQ
• Included accessories:
  • IEMs pre-attached with cables
  • 2 ear tip types (names unclear in subtitles): one with “balance board” and another “wh-bard/whiteboard” style
  • Pouch
  • Manual/postcard and warranty card
• Build & comfort:
  • Housing mostly plastic
  • Faceplate/metal section with branding:
    • “Tanzim” on one side
    • “Tex Bunny” on the other
  • Nozzle size: relatively large (~4 to 4.5 mm, per subtitles)
  • 2-pin 0.78mm connector
  • Silver-plated copper cable
  • 3.5mm jack
• Tip fit:
  • Stock fit described as light and comfortable, with passive isolation “enough”
  • For better fit: suggests aftermarket tips like SpinFit CP100+ / SpinFit CP15 (also mentions Tanzim TB as acceptable)

Sound Impressions (Key Points)

Tuning

• Neutral to slightly bright
• Emphasis on mids and treble

Bass

• Tight and controlled
• More assertive beatbass quantity
• Not “earthy”:
  • Less sub-bass/weight for bassheads
• Overall: less suitable for strong bass lovers

Vocals

• Neutral, clean, sweet, forward (safe—not harsh per subtitles)
• Male vocals: described as “bodied”
• Female vocals: sparkling treble with detail
  • Can sound lively without being hard/aggressive

Treble / Detail

• Small instrument details described as strong (e.g., hi-hat/cymbals)

Soundstage & Separation

• Soundstage: sufficient for the ~Rp 300k price
• Separation/layering: good for the price

DSP Version Notes (Comparison Only)

• Compared to the 3.5mm model, the DSP version boosts high frequencies, making it brighter and potentially more aggressive for some listeners.
• DSP app control:
  • Download requires getting the app from the Tanzim website
  • Not available on Google Play / App Store (per subtitles)
  • Includes official presets
  • Mentions an “EQ IQ game” / gameplay-tied profile (PC or Nintendo Switch)
  • Supports custom EQ bands

Comparisons Made (Same-Price Class)

• Vs KZ/Chu2 (CHU2):
  • Chu2: overall warmer
  • Chu2: vocals feel more back
  • Tanjim Bunny: vocals feel more forward, with a generally more full sound across frequencies
• Vs TR-Eargate (Tre eargate):
  • TR-Eargate: more neutral
  • Tanjim Bunny: vocals are more forward and more “full” in character

Pros

• Good value for the budget class (~Rp 300k)
• Comfortable for long use; light plastic housing
• Stock passive isolation described as enough
• Sweet/neutral-forward vocals
• Tight, controlled bass (accurate, not bloated)
• Treble sparkle without harshness (per impression)
• Good separation/layering for the price

Cons / Limitations

• Not for bassheads: bass is controlled/tight but not earthy, with less impact/quantity
• 3.5mm vs DSP behavior: DSP may sound brighter and could feel a bit aggressive for some
• DSP app availability/UX: app not on official app stores; must download from the website

User Experience & Driving

• Works well as a daily driver due to comfort and easy drivability (30Ω / 123 dB)
• Testing gear mentioned:
  • Shanling UA1+ dongle DAC
  • Shanling M1+ DAP
• Fit can be improved by swapping tips (e.g., SpinFit CP100+ / CP15)

Overall Verdict / Recommendation

Recommended for listeners who want a Tanzim-style neutral-to-slightly-bright sound with forward, sweet vocals and good detail—especially if you enjoy treble sparkle and vocal presence. Not recommended for users who strongly prioritize bass weight/impact.

If you want extra adjustability, the DSP USB-C version adds EQ/presets, but may lean brighter.

Speaker Notes / Multiple Views

• Appears to be a single main reviewer (no clear multi-speaker debate).
• The “different version” comments (3.5mm vs DSP) and comparisons to CHU2 and TR-Eargate are the main perspectives presented at different times.