Video summary

Ya sé cuál es la mejor cámara gimbal: OSMO POCKET 4P vs LUNA ULTRA

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product(s) reviewed / compared

  • DJI Osmo Pocket 4P (just released)
  • Insta360 Luna Ultra

Both are described as the first “dual-camera gimbal cameras” on the market, each using two cameras/lenses: a main wide lens plus a telephoto. They share similar hardware, but differ in meaningful ways.

Key shared specs / capabilities mentioned

  • 4K at 30 fps and 4K / 1080p up to 60 fps (both mentioned)
  • Two-lens system
    • “one-inch main sensor equivalent to ~20mm” + a second ~60mm lens
  • Telephoto zoom
    • 3x optical zoom
    • up to 12x zoom
  • Modes (both)
    • video, night mode, slow motion, timelapse, panorama
    • photo up to 37MP

Main differences (features + what the reviewer observed)

1) Lens aperture & implications for low light / bokeh

Main lens aperture

  • Osmo: f/2.0
  • Luna: f/1.7
    • The reviewer notes Luna’s lower f-number could help the main camera in low light.

Telephoto lens aperture

  • Osmo: f/1.8
  • Luna: f/2.0
    • The reviewer suggests this could help Osmo’s telephoto bokeh (background blur).

Takeaway: performance isn’t fully predictable and depends on the scenario.

2) Image look: color, contrast, skin tone

Overall look test (4K/30fps standard profile)

  • Luna: warmer image (moon/scene), perceived as more pleasant
  • Osmo: cooler image, higher contrast, more intense highlights

Skin tones (usability note)

  • With pinkish skin, the reviewer saw Insta360 as slightly more yellow/less pink
  • Osmo skin tone was described as more natural

3) Stabilization & “gimbal feel”

Running tests

  • Both can track with face tracking enabled.
  • Osmo judged slightly better stabilization during movement.

Odd behavior

  • Osmo shows slight strange shaking when turned off (audible/noise difference noted)
  • Luna does not show the same issue

4) Ergonomics / controls / physical handling

While both share a similar form factor, the reviewer highlights several practical differences:

  • Osmo head: described as bulky and awkwardly unbalanced when stowed
  • Luna stows more cleanly because lenses rotate to avoid exposure

Buttons + shortcuts

  • Luna: extra buttons are on-screen and configurable
  • Osmo: extra buttons are below the screen
    • reviewer says this can be a problem in portrait mode (can’t use them comfortably)

Zoom control preference

  • Luna: includes an extra sliding button for zoom → “much easier to control”
  • Osmo: relies on screen/joystick workflow
    • reviewer struggles with tapping a hidden/less responsive control
    • reviewer personally prefers physical buttons

Touch responsiveness (Osmo)

  • Reviewer finds Osmo screen buttons hard to press (finger sometimes not registering; multiple attempts)
  • Reviewer says Insta360 works better here

Comfort / grip

  • Weight: Osmo 230g vs Luna 233g
  • Reviewer feels Osmo is too small for their hand without an adapter and worries about slipping when using both cameras
  • A potential grip/comfort issue for “most users” is implied

5) Zoom lens performance & tracking at max zoom

Both zoom well, but with tradeoffs:

  • Osmo
    • stronger bokeh/background blur
    • more noise at max zoom
  • Luna
    • better target recognition/locking at maximum zoom
    • easier object tracking UX:
      • object tracking selection feels easier on Insta360
      • Osmo requires deeper menu navigation (“goal tracking menu”)
    • for moving targets (cyclists), Luna is easier to track

Face tracking

  • Both do well for faces; joystick press activates tracking.

Edge case

  • Osmo allegedly blocked the lens when attempting a dual-camera simultaneous cyclist shot; required more effort vs Luna.

6) Remote/controller experience (creator-focused differentiator)

Insta360 Luna Ultra

  • Lets you remove the screen and leaves a full remote controller
  • Remote can improve precision control
  • Remote can function as a microphone for creator workflows

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P

  • Controller is not included in the standard pack
    • included in a “more complete/blog pack”
  • Reviewer criticisms:
    • controller can’t power on the camera (camera must be on to link)
    • controller can’t adjust image parameters; you must preconfigure the camera

7) Storage included + capacity

  • Osmo: 103GB
  • Luna: 47GB

Reviewer emphasizes Osmo offers more than double storage—useful since storage is “expensive.”

8) Battery and heat

Battery life claims mentioned

  • Osmo: 3.5 hours
  • Luna: 4 hours

Temperature

  • Reviewer says both heated up equally, with no excessive heat warnings.

9) Recording resolution/frames (performance ceiling)

Insta360 strengths in higher frame/resolution options

  • Luna: 2.7K intermediate resolution
  • Luna: up to 4K 120fps
  • Luna: up to 1080p 240fps
  • Luna: 8K up to 30fps (Osmo “fell short” here)

Vertical mode nuance

  • Both can do vertical recording with screen rotation at 3K 60fps
  • If Luna is held in true vertical orientation, it can do 8K 30fps
  • Osmo attempt warned: stabilizer limits reached, suggesting it’s not designed for that

10) Color profiles / post-production flexibility (major deciding factor)

Luna

  • Uses a Log profile described as [music] log

Osmo

  • Offers D-Log 1 and D-Log 2

Reviewer clarification

  • These are described as log / pro-grade profiles, not “turbo” modes.
  • They preserve more information for editing latitude, but may look flat/gray in-camera.

Which looks better (based on tests)

  • Reviewer says Osmo’s D-Log 2 is “unmatched” and can produce very beautiful results.
  • Luna advantage: can combine log recording with a Leica filter.
  • However, reviewer claims Luna’s workflow may be less compelling because the final recorded file can lack color even if it looked colored during capture.

Net

  • Osmo can win decisively for users who edit well.
  • Without editing skills, log workflows may be harder.

Night mode / low-light results (practical takeaway)

  • Osmo
    • more visibility in dark areas
    • more noise
    • selfie mode looked pretty bad vs Luna
  • Luna
    • less detail capture, but less noise
    • overall more pleasing image
  • Reviewer conclusion: Luna behaves better; they would choose Luna for night recording.

Packaging / accessories differences

Osmo basic package criticism

  • Reviewer says DJI “fell short” by not including a small protective bag that adequately protects
  • Osmo bag is described as not protecting much

Luna packaging

  • Includes a solid case and storage space for filters

“Basic pack” contents (as compared by the reviewer)

  • Osmo basic pack includes: bag, strap, cable, tripod adapter, light
  • Luna basic pack includes: cable, strap, tripod adapter, solid case

Pricing mentioned

  • Osmo Pocket 4P standard pack: €599
  • Insta360 Luna Ultra: €729
  • Difference: ~€130 (reviewer calls it significant, especially for beginners)

Pros / Cons summarized from the video

Insta360 Luna Ultra — Pros

  • Warmer / more pleasant look; better low-noise night performance
  • Better target tracking/locking at max zoom
  • Easier object tracking selection UX
  • More convenient zoom control (sliding zoom button)
  • Better controller experience:
    • screen removed → full remote
    • remote also acts as microphone
  • Better resolution/framerate options:
    • 2.7K, 4K 120fps, 8K 30fps, plus more true-vertical flexibility
  • Includes solid protective case and filter storage

Insta360 Luna Ultra — Cons

  • Skin tone described as slightly less natural to the reviewer (more yellowish)
  • Standard profile tests suggest a preference bias toward Osmo’s cinematic/contrast look

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P — Pros

  • Slightly better stabilization while running (per reviewer test)
  • Stronger bokeh/background blur at telephoto
  • More natural skin tones (per reviewer)
  • Higher internal storage (103GB vs 47GB)
  • Color profile advantage for editing:
    • D-Log 2 singled out as “unmatched”
  • Better for creators already in the DJI ecosystem and who plan to post-produce

DJI Osmo Pocket 4P — Cons

  • More noise in max zoom and night scenarios (per reviewer)
  • Controller limited / not included in standard pack; less creator-friendly out of the box
  • Screen button usability issues (hard to tap reliably)
  • Extra shortcut buttons under screen may be unusable in portrait mode
  • Odd shaking behavior when turned off
  • Basic bag offers insufficient protection
  • Less advanced capture ceilings vs Luna (no 8K/30fps claim; stabilizer limits for vertical 8K attempt)

Final verdict / recommendation (as stated or implied)

The reviewer frames an “opinion contradiction”:

  • Technical creator workflow pick: Insta360 Luna Ultra
    • remote-first creator workflow
    • 8K options
    • easier tracking selection
    • better night noise behavior
  • Personal comfort pick: despite being “more creator end-to-end,” the reviewer personally feels more comfortable using Luna and would use it more.
    • They still note Osmo may be better for people who edit (especially with D-Log 2).

Ultimate personal choice: the reviewer would pick the Insta360 Luna Ultra due to user experience, even while acknowledging Osmo’s potential image quality advantages with proper post-processing.

Unique points mentioned (complete list)

  • Both are first dual-camera gimbal cameras
  • Luna includes a mini tripod hidden in adapter
  • Osmo supports recording in D-Log 2 / Delog
  • Moon vs Osmo: different warmth/coolness, contrast, highlight intensity
  • Main lens aperture differences (f/2.0 vs f/1.7)
  • Telephoto aperture differences (f/1.8 vs f/2.0)
  • Skin tone differences (Insta more yellowish; Osmo more natural to the reviewer)
  • Microphone differences mentioned (audio comparison promised via recordings)
  • Stabilization: Osmo slightly better during running; Luna more “scene movement” with face tracking
  • Osmo off-state shaking noise issue
  • Physical design differences:
    • Osmo bulk/unbalanced when off
    • Luna better lens protection (rotating lenses)
  • Screen orientation: both rotate; extra buttons placement affects portrait mode usability (Osmo issue)
  • Luna zoom control via slide button
  • Osmo zoom control requiring joystick and hidden button access
  • Telephoto differences:
    • Osmo bokeh more evident
    • Luna locks onto targets better at max zoom
  • Osmo more noise at max zoom
  • Osmo larger crop despite same focal length (noted as odd)
  • Luna removes screen to create a full remote; remote can act as microphone
  • Osmo controller limitations:
    • not included in standard pack
    • can’t power camera
    • can’t control image parameters
  • Osmo bag protection criticized; Luna includes solid case with filter storage
  • Mode similarities; panorama differences:
    • Osmo 180°
    • Luna 200MP pano + 360° capability
  • Slow motion similar quality
  • Frame/quality differences:
    • Osmo: 4K up to 240fps (main camera)
    • Luna: 4K up to 120fps; 1080p up to 240fps; 2.7K intermediate
    • Luna: 8K up to 30fps; Osmo lacks (and stabilizer warns for vertical attempt)
  • Night performance:
    • Osmo more visible but noisier; selfie worse
    • Luna cleaner/pleasing
  • Tracking:
    • both face tracking works well
    • Luna better object tracking due to simpler selection
    • Luna easier for moving cyclists
    • Osmo may block lens in dual-cam attempt
  • Color profile deep dive:
    • Luna log vs Osmo D-Log 1/D-Log 2
    • log preserves editing latitude (not auto improvement)
    • Osmo standard vs Delog 1 large difference; reviewer preference noted
    • Luna Leica filter with log workflow limitations described
    • reviewer ranks Osmo D-Log 2 above others for beauty
  • Ergonomics:
    • Osmo too small grip feel; risk of slipping
    • Osmo screen recognition issues
    • weight nearly equal (230g vs 233g)
    • heat similar; no overheating warnings
  • Battery claims: Osmo 3.5h; Luna 4h
  • Storage capacity: Osmo 103GB vs Luna 47GB
  • Price: €599 vs €729 (~€130 difference)
  • User-experience contradiction conclusion (creator workflow vs personal comfort)
  • Overall personal recommendation: Insta360 Luna Ultra due to comfort/UX

Speaker views

  • Single main speaker (the reviewer) covering:
    • hands-on usability/ergonomics
    • stabilization and tracking tests
    • night performance observations
    • menu/mode differences
    • heavy emphasis on color profile comparison (major decision factor)
    • final “who they’d buy” recommendation based on UX

Original video