🔴 Why We Don't Own Enough Commodities For What's Coming Next | Brian Paes-Braga

Summary of Main Points (News / Commentary)

• Commodities are in a “super cycle,” led by the United States. Brian Paes-Braga argues the current period will reward hard assets—especially commodities tied to U.S. policy priorities. He attributes this to the U.S.’s underinvestment in critical industries needed for civilization and infrastructure.

• Cost of capital and interest-rate uncertainty are pressuring metals in the short term. The discussion begins with U.S. 10-year yields briefly breaking above ~5%, followed by a selloff in metals (including gold, silver, copper, and platinum). The guest expects continued volatility as markets price upcoming Fed actions, but believes the medium-term direction still favors commodity upside.

• Sovereign-debt and inflation concerns underpin the thesis more than a single rate decision.

  • Paes-Braga cites the U.S. deficit as over $40 trillion and suggests the U.S. balance sheet is at risk.
  • He argues higher rates may have limited impact compared with an “inevitable outcome” of a broader sovereign debt crisis, alongside persistent inflation realities.
  • He frames inflation as driven by energy prices (linked to war and supply constraints) and trade wars/protectionism, which he says are inherently inflationary.

• Historical “capital rotation” from tech toward real assets/materials.

  • Using a cited ratio chart (Thomson Reuters commodities index vs. NASDAQ), he argues commodities have been extremely cheap relative to equities historically.
  • He expects a future shift—described as a “pendulum swinging” effect—where capital returns to materials because the real world must be rebuilt and expanded for infrastructure, grids, and AI/data centers.
  • He emphasizes mining lead times: the average U.S. mine development cycle is described as ~27 years, implying supply constraints and delayed responses.

• Where outperformance may come from: metals tied to U.S. policy.

  • He highlights that gains are likely strongest in commodities aligned with what the U.S. government wants (critical minerals, reshoring, and re-industrialization).
  • He expects price spikes and an overall trend described as “up and to the right,” while stressing commodity volatility.

• Gold vs. credit money framing.

  • He argues gold is “money”, while the U.S. dollar functions more like credit, and he suggests crises reveal weaknesses in the financial system.
  • He links commodity strength to the idea that increased money supply must “find a home,” and that commodities historically preserve value during turbulent periods.

---

What’s Being Built: Metals Royalty Company (TMCR)

Purpose and Strategy

Paes-Braga describes TMCR as a financing platform focused on U.S. critical mineral security and re-industrialization, aiming to finance U.S.-relevant mining and processing through royalties.

Investment Thesis

He reiterates a generational super cycle and claims the company is positioned for cash-flowing royalties from long-duration assets required for U.S. industrial buildout.

Track Record / Scale (As Described by the Guest)

• Within ~90 days of listing, TMCR has raised over $250M (possibly $300M, per subtitles).
• The company has acquired royalties including:
  • Msabi (iron ore): described with a price floor of $150/ton and a “toll road”-style payment linked to production.
  • Nori (deep-sea minerals): exposure to nickel, copper, cobalt, and manganese. He argues deep-sea assets can be built when pricing and policy finally make projects viable.

Iron Ore View

• He expects inflationary pressure across commodities, but does not claim iron ore will necessarily outperform the entire basket, given that supply can respond and iron is “plentiful.”
• Still, he argues that U.S.-located iron ore in Minnesota, plus vertical integration into pellet form and the royalty structure, makes it strategically valuable.

Royalty vs. Mining Stock (Explanation)

• A royalty is described as a toll on revenue (e.g., a percentage of revenue per ton), meaning the royalty holder carries less operational burden.
• Compared to operating companies, royalties reduce exposure to many costs and risks, such as labor, sustaining capex, and operational execution risk, leaving more economics to flow after taxes/debt/staffing.

Allocation and Exposure Estimates (TMCR)

He frames current exposure as an approximate cash-flow “basket”:

• Iron ore: ~20–30%
• Manganese: ~20–30%
• Nickel/copper/cobalt and others (from Nori): ~20–30% combined for copper + cobalt, with nickel identified as the main driver for the Nori portion.

He says the company intends to add further exposures over time, including rare earths, lithium, uranium, and other critical next-generation metals—while de-emphasizing precious metals for now.

---

Closing Note

The episode ends with the expectation that Fed action this week could impact markets. However, the guest remains broadly bullish that commodity-linked, U.S.-policy-aligned assets will perform over time.

---

Presenters / Contributors

• Danny (host of Capital Cosm)
• Brian Paes-Braga (CEO, Metals Royalty Company / TMCR)