Video summary
I've been hiding this from you.
Main summary
Key takeaways
Coming Clean After the Sonicdrive Incident
The speaker says they are “coming clean” following a recent exposé video by John from Sonicdrive Studio. The video addresses allegations about the speaker’s hidden ownership of a guitar brand.
They state that for most of 2025 they ran Icebreaker Guitars (also referred to as “Icebrescher” in a German pronunciation) while keeping their personal ownership secret. They claim the secrecy was primarily to avoid attaching a product to their own YouTube reputation and to help the brand grow independently.
Timeline and Background
- Early 2025 (February): Decision to start a guitar company.
- April 2025: First production batch arrives.
- May 2025: First batch goes live.
They say they kept ownership secret to preserve brand longevity and avoid controversy connected to a creator’s name. Their argument is that products can last longer when they are not tied to an individual with an online following.
The John / Sonicdrive Studio Incident
The guitar and QC concerns
The first batch included a Meshuggah tribute Iceman 8-string. The speaker says John bought it using an artist discount and then sent it back.
They report that the guitar had QC issues and “should not have gone out,” which the speaker attributes to the company being overworked at the time.
Disagreement over how the return was handled
The speaker claims the situation was handled poorly by both sides, including:
- John reportedly sent it back without formally requesting a return, and allegedly used the wrong courier.
- After communications broke down, John reportedly blocked the company.
- The speaker says John later posted “disgusting” comments on his YouTube channel (with sensitive details censored in the subtitles). They add that this frightened the speaker and implied the speaker was dangerous or malicious.
Speaker’s explanation and ongoing refund process
The speaker insists they had no reason to do anything harmful. They also note they were already working with Reverb to obtain a refund at their cost price.
They further say John eventually reached out directly for advice while the issue was still ongoing, but the speaker couldn’t be fully transparent due to the secret-ownership situation.
Response to Allegations and Stance Going Forward
The speaker says they will not:
- play,
- advertise, or
- commercially promote
the guitars on their channel.
They add that they will answer questions honestly if viewers ask.
They also argue the secrecy was strategic rather than malicious, and that the ownership arrangement is separate from other ventures they run.
Broader Fallout: “Bandwagoning” and Proposed Discourse
The speaker claims their day has been dominated by other creators “bandwagoning” on perceived integrity issues.
They propose “open discourse” with some creators, suggesting that further discussion be uploaded “uncut,” rather than building additional pile-ons.
Defense and Conclusion
- The speaker apologizes on behalf of the company for the product/QC issues and the mishandled return process.
- They state their conscience is clear regarding the alleged harmful implication.
- They emphasize pride in what the company built, including:
- models co-designed with artists, and
- positive customer feedback.
- They express relief at no longer having to carry the secrecy.
Presenters or Contributors
- Main speaker: Kaylin (as given in the subtitles as the speaker’s first name)
- John from Sonicdrive Studio: referenced as the creator who made the exposé video and was involved in the guitar return/QC incident