Video summary
Peintures CHABAUD, tests et avis
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product / brand tested
- Chabaud (Chabo / “Chabo brand”) paint range
- An established French brand, founded in the 1950s
- Has a storefront in Montpellier
- Offers:
- Decorative interior paints
- More technical coatings (e.g., facade paints, waterproofing, sealing)
- Described as tied to heritage and building work
Paints reviewed (main features, pros/cons, performance)
1) Chabomat (water-based matte paint)
Key features
- Water-dilutable (easy cleanup; can be thinned with water)
- Matte, airy finish attributed to acrylic resin
- Designed to be dilutable and controllable for consistency
- Tested on walls (though described as ideal for ceilings)
Pros
- Very good opacity/coverage
- “Doesn’t bleed in raking light” when applied like a professional
- (tip: load paint generously and don’t overwork)
- “Doesn’t bleed in raking light” when applied like a professional
- Smooth, professional application
- Not too thick and not runny
- Didn’t need significant dilution
- Yield matches expectations
- Advertised 8–11 m²/L
- Tester estimate: ~10 m²/L
- Low odor
- Smells like “paint,” not strongly unpleasant
- Ventilation is easier than with harsher-smelling paints
Cons / limitations
- Performance depends on the substrate
- Worst surface tested increased difficulty
- If paint has gone bad in the can (rare but possible), it will stink on the wall too
- Odor is minor overall, but hot conditions can make smells linger
Rating given
- Two stars (for both quality and price positioning)
2) Desco Velvet Screed / Velvet-effect paint
(“Rolls Royce” of the range per speaker)
Key features
- Acrylic velvet-effect finish
- Sits between matte and satin
- Water-diluted if needed
- Aims to capture the beauty of matte with the practicality of satin
- Suggested for all rooms
- Caution on ceilings: velvet/satin can highlight imperfections more than matte
Pros
- Perfect consistency
- Easy brushwork; roller glides smoothly
- Excellent opacity/coverage
- Effectively hides yellow marks and stains
- Yield aligns near the top of the advertised range
- Advertised 8–12 m²/L
- Tester lands near the high end
- Mild smell (essentially like paint)
Cons / limitations
- Substrate porosity affects consumption
- Can double usage vs expectations
- Velvet is slightly more liquid than matte
- Tester still reports strong consistency/coverage
Rating given
- Two stars
- Value/price: described as a bit more expensive than the matte
3) Decolux Satin / lacquer-like satin
(described as “no. 44”; meant for many surfaces)
Key features
- Applies to virtually all surfaces
- Indoors and outdoors
- Lacquered smooth appearance
- Works on plaster, woodwork, and iron
- Not forgiving of surface prep
Pros
- Smooth lacquer finish
- Looks excellent in raking light when applied properly
- Spreads well for a lacquer
- Consistency described as not overly oily and not too runny
- Odor: slight pine smell, faint while painting indoors
Cons / limitations
- Requires careful technique
- Risk of splatter on corners and drips
- Avoid “going at it like a mule”
- Multiple coats needed for tougher items
- Tester: 3 coats on a sealed door for best opacity
- Wood required more coats (some “surprises” with door/wood situations)
- Surface preparation is critical
- Imperfections show
- Value concerns
- “Sold basically without preservatives”
- Described as quite expensive
- Compared to a luxury paint category
Rating given
- One star for overall value
- Still scored around 8/10 for results if you’re willing to pay
Comparisons made
Within the brand range
- Chabomat (matte) vs Velvet (between matte and satin)
- Velvet costs more, but balances look + practicality
- Decolux Satin (lacquer)
- Positioned as broader-surface and higher-prep/technique
- Also more expensive
Against cheaper market options
- A different “specular gloss” is said to have cheaper alternatives
- Lower score mentioned (one star) for that specular gloss case
Against premium/luxury paints
- Decolux is compared to luxury offerings (e.g., “like the one Benjamin would sell”)
Brand availability/recognition
- Chabaud is noted as less known nationally outside the Montpellier area (“those who live in Montpellier”)
Unique points mentioned across the video (all together)
- Brand history: created in the 1950s, known in Montpellier
- Brand scope: interior decor + technical exterior products (facades, waterproofing, sealing)
- Chabomat
- Water-based, water-dilutable
- Matte airy acrylic resin finish
- Strong opacity; doesn’t bleed in raking light with correct technique
- Chabomat
- Advertised 8–11 m²/L; tester estimates ~10 m²/L
- Application should follow “professional style” (don’t overwork)
- Chabomat odor: mild, paint-like; ventilation recommended
- Chabomat value: “two stars” for quality/price using public price (without store markup)
- Velvet
- Acrylic velvet effect between matte and satin
- Suitable for rooms; avoid ceilings to prevent showing imperfections
- Velvet
- Easy brush/roller; excellent opacity and coverage
- Yield near the high end (8–12 m²/L)
- Velvet
- Substrate porosity can increase consumption up to double
- Decolux Satin
- Lacquer-like; works indoors/outdoors on many substrates (plaster, wood, iron)
- Decolux Satin
- Needs careful surface prep; technique affects splatter/drips
- Decolux Satin
- Tester required 3 coats on a door for best opacity; wood increased effort
- Decolux Satin odor: faint pine smell
- Decolux Satin coverage/value
- Advertised 12–14 m²/L
- Tester got about ~14 m²/L in practice (multiple doors/coats)
- Decolux Satin price
- Expensive; value score reduced, but still worthwhile for strong results
- Closing praise: enjoyable to test; encourages discovering less-known regional brands
Speakers / voices
- Main speaker/tester (Michel/Gaston bit as roleplay/comic framing)
- Provides performance tests, application tips, yields, and star ratings
- “Julien” (mentioned as contacting the reviewer earlier)
- Credited for patience, but does not review the paint directly
- “Michel” (character)
- Mostly prompts questions; no separate technical evaluation
Overall verdict / recommendation
- Best for easy, reliable coverage: Chabomat (matte)
- Strong opacity, good workability, solid value
- Best “look + practicality” finish: Velvet-effect paint
- Excellent coverage and smoother result than pure matte
- Slightly higher cost; consumption depends on substrate porosity
- Best if you’re willing to pay and prep carefully: Decolux Satin lacquer
- Excellent versatile finish on many substrates
- More expensive and more demanding in application and surface preparation
Recommendation: For most users, start with Chabomat matte or Velvet for a nicer finish. Choose Decolux Satin mainly for projects that truly require its lacquered, multi-surface performance.