Video summary
Why I Sell In The Money Covered Calls
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-focused summary (covered calls “in the money”)
Presenter / program
- Mark Yaggi explains why he prefers selling covered call options with strikes that are “in the money” (ITM) rather than out-of-the-money (OTM).
- He references his teaching system/program: “Cash Flow Machine.”
Core thesis (why ITM covered calls)
- Primary goal: generate option income (“juice”) rather than stock appreciation.
- Account protection first: keeping the short call ITM is framed as a way to reduce/avoid dollar-for-dollar losses under the strike price (presented as downside protection).
- Why ITM helps: ITM calls provide a cushion because you receive:
- Intrinsic value (because the call is ITM), and
- Extrinsic value / time premium (the “juice”),
- Both contribute to the premium collected.
Caution/disclaimer-style points (as stated)
-
He emphasizes he’s not predicting stock direction:
“I have no idea if a stock is going up or down.”
-
He repeatedly warns that “hope is not a strategy.”
- He uses non-guarantee language (e.g., “never” / “not guaranteed”) regarding covered call outcomes.
Option mechanics / methodology used in examples
- The premium is treated as two components:
- Intrinsic value (the ITM amount)
- Extrinsic value (OTM/time value = “juice”)
- At expiration:
- Time value (“juice”) → 0
- Intrinsic value depends on where the stock ends relative to the strike.
- If the stock moves:
- ITM intrinsic value on the short option can move against you,
- He claims it offsets with gains/losses on the long stock position,
- Leaving “juice” as the intended return driver.
- He mentions the “maximum profit cap” idea, but values the higher probability of realizing “juice.”
Step-by-step framework / decision logic (as stated)
- Before selling calls: focus on protecting the account; prioritize downside management over maximizing upside.
- Choose strike positioning:
- Prefer ITM (left side of the “ATM” line) in many/most markets for more downside cushion.
- Use ATM when appropriate, but he argues ITM is safer in “crazy markets.”
- He notes there are times for ATM/OTM, but he prefers ITM “especially these days.”
- Income driver: collect time premium via theta decay / time erosion (“the juice”).
- Market regime overlay (near the end):
- He says he uses market timing and “stock timing”, determining whether the market is red/green/yellow.
- When probability improves (e.g., “green”), he suggests considering ATM or slightly OTM.
- Otherwise, avoid consistently selling far OTM in down markets.
Key market/investing performance claims (numbers given)
- He claims that covered calls structured this way can yield:
- “1 to 2% a week”
- or “2 to 4% a month”
- He contrasts this with “buy and hold” or covered-call approaches that are typically OTM.
Examples with explicit tickers and strikes
Apple (AAPL) example (≈32 days to expiration)
- Stock reference: around $182.80 (subtitle shows “18280 or something like that”).
- Two call strikes from an ~1-month option chain:
ITM call strike: $170
- Intrinsic component roughly $12.88 (framed as “$170 vs ~$182.88”).
- Extrinsic/time premium (“juice”) roughly ~$12.7 per share.
- Framed total income roughly ~$1,200 per contract (math references options typically being 100 shares/contract, with his example using 12k with “10 contracts”).
- Downside cushion / break-even (in his simplified math):
- Stock could drop about $24.95 before break-even.
OTM call strike: $190
- No intrinsic value (OTM), so downside protection is only the “juice.”
- “Juice” roughly ~$11.85 per share (about $1,185 per contract).
- Break-even cushion stated as about ~$11.85 (about half the protection vs the ITM setup).
- Upside capped:
- He mentions making about “$17 bucks” if the stock rises to/exceeds $190.
- He reiterates that the most likely outcome is “nothing happens” (i.e., minimal movement beyond the strike).
Tesla (TSLA) example (≈32 days to expiration)
- Stock reference: around ~$224.
- Compares:
ITM call strike: $205
- Intrinsic value roughly $19.39 per share (also described as “$1939 a contract” / “$19 a share”).
- “Juice” roughly ~$28.56 per share (about $2,856 per contract).
- Break-even cushion roughly ~$47.95 downside before break-even.
OTM call strike: $235
- Intrinsic value $0 (OTM).
- “Juice” roughly ~$29.15 per share (about $2,915 per contract).
- Break-even cushion roughly ~$29.15 downside before break-even.
- Emphasis:
- ITM offers a larger downside cushion but caps upside at the strike.
- OTM can offer similar “juice” but much less downside protection.
Delta / probability metrics mentioned
- For the Apple example (conceptual, using option-chain delta):
- He states delta is ~0.67 and interprets it as a “67% chance” the stock closes at/above a specified level.
- He references delta logic with strike mentions that appear blurred (he mentions 205 in the delta explanation, while earlier Apple strikes discussed are 170/190).
- Later comparison references:
- A lower probability scenario around ~53% for higher-upside OTM calls.
Exercise/assignment and taxes (risk/disclosure points)
- Assignment (“exercise”) question addressed:
- He says assignment typically means you’ve likely achieved maximum profit, then you can roll into another trade.
- He claims assignment “rarely happens” if you roll.
- He mentions he hasn’t been assigned in a long time.
- Tax issues (as a possible concern):
- He suggests assignment could affect whether you can do the same stock-option cycle again for about 31 days (subtitle phrasing suggests a timing constraint; the exact rule wasn’t clearly cited).
Overall tone
- He frames assignment as something not to fear if the goal is income generation and rolling.
Explicit recommendations / cautions extracted
- Recommendation: Prefer selling covered calls ITM in many markets, especially during declines/“crazy markets,” to avoid “catastrophic losses.”
- Caution: Avoid selling too far OTM based on the assumption the stock will bounce; “hope is not a strategy.”
- Risk framing: covered calls can still lead to losses when wrong; he discourages assuming guaranteed outcomes.
Disclosures / disclaimers
- No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitles.
- He states he’s not sure whether stocks go up/down and discusses outcomes probabilistically.
Tickers / instruments mentioned
- AAPL (Apple): strikes referenced 170, 190 (≈32 days to expiration)
- TSLA (Tesla): strikes referenced 205, 235 (≈32 days to expiration)
- Instruments: covered call structure, intrinsic/extrinsic value, theta decay / time premium.
Key timelines referenced
- Examples are shown for roughly ~32 days (~1 month) to expiration.
- Rolling is described as a typical cadence in weekly intervals.
Sources / presenters (end)
- Mark Yaggi (sole presenter; “Cash Flow Machine” referenced as his program)