Video summary

MILEAGE TEST OF MY HYRYDER BASE MODEL IN HIGWAY...FULL HIGWAY TEST...KITNA DETI HAIN?🤔

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product Reviewed

Maruti Suzuki Ertiga / “Hyryder base model” (referred to as “Hyryder”, gas/petrol mileage test) — specifically, a highway fuel economy (mileage) test.

Main Test Method (as Described)

  • The vehicle was taken to the highway.
  • The petrol tank was filled from a pump to auto-cut (after it was already full “from last night”).
  • Trip meter(s) were reset (speed/average displayed on the console).
  • The car was driven for about ~30–32 km total, including:
    • merging,
    • traffic,
    • and U-turns.
  • Final comparison was done by refueling again at the pump and estimating fuel used.

Key Mileage / Ratings Mentioned

Highway (Main Result)

  • The car’s display average during the run showed values like: 18.9 → 17.1 → 22.7 → ~25.9 → ~26

  • Final “real” calculation after refueling again:

    • Petrol added: ₹117
    • Estimated usage: roughly ~1.20 L used for the trip distance
    • Conclusion: about 25–26 km/l (described as an approximately ~25 mpg-type figure in local units)
  • Final takeaway: Highway average ≈ 25–26 km/l, especially around speed ~80 km/h.

City Mileage

  • City mileage is referenced as being lower.
  • The speaker mentions they plan to publish (or already have) another city video.
  • The speaker attributes lower city mileage to more market/traffic-like driving conditions.
  • No exact city mileage number is provided in this clip.

Main Features / Factors Affecting Mileage (User Experience)

  • Speed dependence (big factor):
    • At ~80 km/h, the speaker reports very good average (≈25–26).
    • Mileage drops with higher speed:
      • ~100–112 km/h → ~24 km/l
      • At a “higher speed” scenario (unclear wording: “If you maintain a speed of 1”), mileage is suggested to be around ~20 km/l
  • Traffic and driving style matter:
    • Other drivers may see different results due to acceleration/braking and traffic density.
    • Flyovers/merging caused on-screen averages/graph to fluctuate.
  • Fuel gauge / trip confidence:
    • The speaker did not fully trust the MID (vehicle display).
    • They relied on the auto-cut refuel method for a more “real average.”

  • Engine/vehicle characteristics highlighted:

    • The speaker credits Maruti’s engine efficiency.

    • Notes that despite the vehicle’s:

      • larger dimensions,
      • big tyres (215/…), it still achieves good highway mileage.

    • Implies strong efficiency even for a larger, SUV-like body style.

Pros (As Stated / Implied)

  • Excellent highway mileage (~25–26 km/l) around 80 km/h.
  • Mileage stays good even with:
    • highway traffic pockets,
    • merges,
    • flyover driving,
    • and the feel of a large/heavier vehicle.
  • Fuel economy appears consistent with both:
    • onboard reading, and
    • the refuel-based calculation (aligned around ~26).
  • Strong positive recommendation for highway travelers.

Cons / Limitations (As Mentioned)

  • MID display not trusted; considered less reliable than auto-cut refueling.
  • Highway test is not perfectly continuous (traffic, U-turns, flyovers), so it reflects mixed real-world driving.
  • City mileage is lower, and exact value is not provided.

Comparisons Made

  • The speaker compares impressions vs other vehicles/models:
    • Suggests that if their Creta experienced similar conditions, it wouldn’t match this mileage (implied comparison).
    • Claims Maruti engine efficiency as the main reason.
    • Mentions other cars like Creta may be less efficient (no direct test data shown).

Unique Points List (Distinct Claims in Subtitles)

  1. Mentions people asking for average/mileage test.
  2. Uses auto-cut refueling as the primary measurement technique.
  3. Tests over highway (~30–32 km) distance.
  4. Resets trip/average readings before the test.
  5. On-screen average fluctuated: 18.9, 17.1, 22.7, 25.9, ~26.
  6. Final calculated average after second refuel: ~25–26 km/l.
  7. Emphasizes results depend heavily on driving speed and style.
  8. At ~80 km/h, average is best (~25–26).
  9. At ~100–112 km/h, average drops to ~24.
  10. Predicts ~20 km/l at higher speeds (wording unclear, but context suggests faster driving reduces mileage).
  11. Does not trust MID much; relies more on auto-cut refuel.
  12. Claims city mileage is lower and references a separate city video.
  13. Credits Maruti engine efficiency despite vehicle size/weight.
  14. Mentions tyres as large/spec-like (215…), implying that larger tyres should reduce mileage—but performance is still strong.
  15. Suggests highway buyers should choose this model for more highway travel.
  16. Recommends buying “with eyes closed” for highway mileage seekers.
  17. Mentions real route references (e.g., Mathura Road / flyover / Badarpur border) to describe realism of conditions.

Speakers / Perspectives

  • Single main speaker (no separate reviewer voice clearly identified).
  • The speaker:
    • conducts the test,
    • narrates route/conditions,
    • reports onboard readings and calculated average,
    • comments on MID reliability,
    • and provides opinions comparing to other cars.

Concise Verdict / Recommendation

Recommended primarily for highway mileage performance. Based on this test, the Hyryder base model delivers ~25–26 km/l on the highway around 80 km/h, with mileage decreasing as speed increases. City mileage is implied to be lower, and the speaker advises prioritizing the highway advantage when choosing this vehicle.

Original video