This $69 Gaming PC is INCREDIBLE

Product Reviewed

A “$69 gaming PC” built mostly from an older HP Z420 workstation (2012), with budget upgrades—such as a lower-end Nvidia Quadro GPU and a low-cost SSD/HDD setup—to fit within the remaining budget.

---

Key Specs / Features Mentioned

• CPU: Intel Xeon (quad-core) (exact model not specified)
  • Noted as strong for esports despite its age.
• RAM: 16GB DDR3
  • Installed as two sticks (the platform supports quad-channel, with four sticks optimal), but it still runs in dual-channel mode.
  • Includes a RAM clip-on memory cooler.
• Storage:
  • Initially no drive, later added a budget SSD: ADATA SU-635 240GB.
  • No proper SSD mounting point; the drive was tucked in due to budget constraints (avoided double-sided tape).
• GPU: Nvidia Quadro NVS 510 (2GB VRAM)
  • Framed as CAD/CGI-focused, not a gaming GPU.
  • Limited VRAM reduces compatibility with newer titles.
• Power Supply: ~600W PSU
  • Noted as lacking mention of 80+ efficiency.
  • Uses a non-standard / proprietary setup.
  • Has 6-pin PCIe connectors and required an adapter for newer GPUs (though this build uses the NVS 510).
• Expansion / IO Limitations (Z420):
  • No support for modern drive standards like M.2 or NVMe.
  • No multi-gigabit LAN.
  • Still offers standard PCIe Gen 3 slots.
  • Supports up to 10 drives via SATA.
  • USB: 3 front and back.
• Cooling / Thermals:
  • Older chassis cooling design; CPU cooler includes multiple heat pipes.
  • Airflow described as limited (mostly a single 92mm rear fan).
  • PSU and RAM described as among the best-cooled parts.

---

Performance & User Experience

Strong Results in Esports

• Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
  • Described as fully playable
  • Mentions 120+ FPS on a 120Hz monitor in some moments
  • Typical range: ~130–170 FPS, sometimes dipping ~80–100 FPS
• Overwatch
  • Described as playable/usable
  • About ~90–100 FPS on 1080p high, with dips to around ~80
• Rocket League
  • Reported to run much better than the original $69 PC build
  • Implies the GPU bottleneck differs from the earlier setup (as suggested by subtitle context).

Not Great for Newer AAA Titles / Common Limitations

• Shadow of the Tomb Raider
  • Runs, but only ~30 FPS average (near playability, but limited)
• Recent AAA / DX12+ / >2GB VRAM titles
  • Explicitly said they won’t run out of the box
  • Examples given:
    • Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands (won’t run normally)
    • Elden Ring (won’t run normally)
• Elden Ring Workaround
  • An offline-mode hack exists
  • Runs “pretty well” for the hardware cost
  • Said to be around ~720p on low, with occasional stuttering
  • No further frame-rate specifics provided beyond “stuttering occasionally.”
• Overall experience summary
  • Competitive-ready esports at ~1080p/high-ish settings
  • Not positioned as a modern AAA “ultra” rig

---

Budget, Value, and Build Constraints

• Original goal: $69 gaming PC
• Inflation context:
  • Their previous $69 value build is described as “more like $82 today.”
• Why the Z420 approach works:
  • Used workstations can be cheap due to resale drops from consumer upgrade cycles.
  • Purchases may require patience:
    • Used workstation pricing can be boom/bust (drops briefly after school/office upgrades).
    • Buying too late can miss deals.
• Parts sourcing anecdotes:
  • GPU hunting was difficult; deals were missed.
  • Couldn’t find the desired GTX 750 Ti, ending up with a different GPU instead (availability-driven).

---

Comparisons Made

• Compared to their prior hyper budget $69 PC (“OG” build)
  • The Z420-based build gets substantially higher frame rates
  • In some cases mentioned: up to ~3x the frame rates vs the prior $69 build
• Compared to a Dell-based machine from 2018
  • The budget value was similar, but inflation made the new build less “realistically $69” than expected.
• Other workstation targets mentioned as worth watching:
  • HP Z440 / Z620 / Z820
  • Similar Dell Precision options (t3600)
  • Similar Lenovo ThinkStation models (s30)

---

Pros (Unique Points)

• Surprisingly strong esports performance for the price (CS:GO, Overwatch playable/competitive)
• 16GB RAM
  • Even though installed as dual-channel, not quad-channel
• Good CPU performance for the class (Xeon workstation platform)
• Value of used workstations
  • Workstation hardware can deliver a lot cheaply
• Expandable via PCIe Gen 3 slots
  • Even if storage standards are outdated
• Affordable storage solution
  • Achieved using a budget SSD

---

Cons / Downsides (Unique Points)

• No modern storage support
  • No M.2 / NVMe
• GPU limitations for gaming
  • NVS 510 (2GB VRAM) struggles with newer/AAA requirements
• Outdated platform features
  • No multi-gigabit LAN
  • Overall compatibility feels very old
• Cooling isn’t ideal overall
  • Mostly single 92mm chassis fan
• SSD mounting workaround
  • SSD placed without proper mounting due to budget
• AAA games often won’t run
  • Some titles fail due to DirectX/VRAM constraints unless worked around
• PSU/connector quirks
  • Proprietary/non-standard power setup and mismatch concerns

---

Numerical Details Mentioned

• Target/claim price: $69 USD
• Context: prior $69 build effectively ~$82 today
• GPU detail: 2GB VRAM
• Storage price rejection examples:
  • $2 for a 250GB SSD (2008-era): “big fat boatload of nope”
  • Other local pricing comparisons mentioned, but final accepted drive was ADATA SU-635 240GB SSD
• Performance examples:
  • CS:GO: 120+ FPS, typical ~130–170, dips ~80–100
  • Overwatch: ~90–100 FPS, dips ~80
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider: ~30 FPS average
• SSD price conversions were referenced, but no single final all-in total was provided beyond the $69 framing.

---

Overall Verdict / Recommendation (from Content)

Recommended for: People who want a very cheap, playable esports PC, especially for CS:GO and Overwatch at 1080p with high/comfortable frame rates.

Not recommended for: Players expecting modern AAA games that require DX12+ and >2GB VRAM, or anyone expecting “ultra settings.” Those games won’t run out of the box and may need hacks/workarounds.

Concise recommendation: If your goal is competitive esports on a budget, this “$69” approach is realistic—just don’t expect a modern AAA gaming rig.

---

Speakers / Views Contributing (as implied)

1. Primary host/builder: core build details, hardware critique (Z420 limitations, cooling, storage/PSU quirks), performance testing, and budget-hunting strategy.
2. Referenced “Riley”: mentioned only in context of an earlier Dell build; no added current evaluation.
3. “Angie/Angela”: workstation-related aside/cameo during inspection; no technical performance input.