It Was Tough Decision For me 🙏

Overview

The video is a personal account from the speaker about resigning from an RRB bank job. The decision is framed as a “tough decision” driven mainly by long-term health constraints rather than dissatisfaction with the role.

Main Points and Reasoning

• Job experience was positive overall

  • After selection, the speaker describes being happy about getting chosen.
  • They state that training and the branch environment were good.

• Fulfillment of original goals

  • A key reason for choosing RRB was home-state posting, which they say was achieved.
  • They received a posting about 90 km away.
  • They also describe having good facilities and staffing at their branch.

• Supportive colleagues and management

  • The speaker repeatedly emphasizes cooperation and trust from the branch manager and office staff.
  • They describe the work culture as manageable during training/probation and regular days.

• Health—not workload pressure—was the real problem

  • The speaker says they have had serious health issues since childhood and cannot sustain a typical routine (they even mention not being able to go to a gym).
  • They report doing well at work and not facing unusual “bank pressure,” but struggling after leaving around 5:00 pm due to physical fatigue and worsening symptoms.
  • They describe taking repeated leaves on medical grounds, including no-pay leave, including after a diagnosis.

• Decision-making process was deliberate

  • They took 2–3 months to think about whether to resign.
  • They discussed the situation with the manager and also with the Regional Manager, who provided options/suggestions.
  • Ultimately, the speaker frames the resignation as a responsibility to choose what allows them to live healthily and meaningfully—stating that if health can’t be balanced, “nothing makes sense.”

What Comes Next (Financial and Career)

• They deny resigning for YouTube alone

  • The speaker anticipates comments accusing them of leaving because of money from YouTube.
  • They argue they had already secured financial options before resigning.

• They continued/finished a course and stayed for impact

  • During the course, they initially didn’t feel like continuing YouTube.
  • They completed it, then continued due to feedback and a desire to help students.

• YouTube is described as supportive work, not the sole exit reason

  • They claim to share about 70% of YouTube income as “salary” (described as an income distribution), emphasizing they are not “earning off students.”
  • They say they promote only genuinely helpful products/courses and will stop if they feel students are not benefiting.

• Future exam prep is not decided yet

  • They will consider suitable exams based on their needs and health constraints.

Additional Audience Messaging

• The speaker warns that some viewers may expect the story to be about “bank pressure” causing resignations, but they insist the job itself was fine.
• They clarify that the issue was their medical limitations.
• They encourage people with health challenges to evaluate whether they can manage a strict routine, while not discouraging those with normal issues.
• They invite supportive comments and allow criticism as part of open discussion.

Presenters / Contributors

• Presenter (speaker): Main narrator/creator (name not provided in subtitles).
• Contributors mentioned:
  • Branch manager (“madam”)
  • Office assistant (“sir”)
  • Other staff/messengers
  • Regional Manager (“sir”) (no names given)