Video summary

Scram 440 Mileage Test on ALL Terrains! | 8 Months Later | Bilaspur Ride

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product Reviewed

TVS “Scram 440” (referred to as “Scram 440” / “Scram for 14” / “Scam for 14” due to subtitle errors) — mileage test after ~8 months of ownership.

Key Test Setup / Usage Conditions

  • Total ride in the vlog: ~210 km (up and down)
  • Route mix:
    • City traffic + hill ride
    • Highway cruising
    • Climbs
    • Off-road-ish / muddy construction patch segments
  • Riding behavior mentioned:
    • In traffic: frequent clutch/brake usage during climbs
    • Highway/cruise:
      • Cruise control set to ~80
      • Riding around 80–100
      • Brief mention of 100–110
  • Weather/location:
    • Bilaspur → mountains in Himachal
    • Multiple tunnels
    • Landslide/road-widening work areas
    • Sunset stop at Bandla Hill Top

Mileage Result (Main Numerical Rating)

  • Petrol filled after the first leg:
    • ₹301 for ~3 liters (₹98.43/liter mentioned)
  • After reaching destination, mileage calculated using:
    • 210 km ÷ 5.85 liters
  • Reported mileage:
    • 35.89 km/l
    • Narrator rounds/quotes: “36 something”
  • Comparison (same test context):
    • Hunter C50: “36 something”
    • Scram 440: 35.89
  • Conclusion:
    • Both are around ~36 km/l, considered very good given the traffic + highway + hills.

Pros Mentioned (Scram 440 / Ride Experience)

  • Strong real-world fuel economy after 8 months: ~36 km/l despite:
    • heavy city traffic
    • hill climbs
    • highway touring
    • riding at 80–100+ speeds
  • Highway cruise comfort:
    • Cruise control used (set around 80) to reduce rider fatigue (“relax my hands”)
  • Ability to cover “all conditions” in the ride:
    • city, highway, and mountains

Cons / Issues Mentioned (Contextual)

Not many direct Scram 440-specific drawbacks are mentioned. Most negative comments in subtitles are general/rider/environment-related:

  • Video device issues (GoPro/other camera mentioned):
    • memory card error risk
    • battery drain / shuts off
    • time-consuming mounting/unmounting
  • Traffic stress / road hazards, including other vehicles’ poor discipline
  • Clutch/brake wear concerns are described generically during climbs in traffic, but it’s not clearly proven as a mechanical issue with the bike.

Comparisons Made With Similar Products

TVS Hunter C50

  • Compared directly in the mileage outcome
  • In this test: both end up at about ~36 km/l

Unique Points Mentioned (Consolidated)

  1. Scram 440 mileage after ~7–8 months: 35.89 km/l (≈ 36 km/l)
  2. Test covers mixed conditions: city traffic + hill climbs + highway cruising
  3. Cruise control used at ~80; riding also mentioned around 80–100 and sometimes 100–110
  4. Result considered very good due to heavy traffic and mixed terrain
  5. Direct mileage comparison vs Hunter C50:
    • Hunter: ~36+
    • Scram: 35.89

Speakers / Viewpoints

  • Main narrator (Gop Vishal / “brother”):
    • performs the journey + mileage calculation
    • provides final mileage numbers and overall conclusion
  • Rider companion referenced (“brother with Hunter”):
    • supports the comparison framing via Hunter’s score (“36 something”)

Verdict / Recommendation

Based on this vlog’s real-world mixed-terrain test, Scram 440 delivers ~35.89 km/l (≈36 km/l) after ~8 months, including city traffic, hills, and highway riding—and it performs essentially on par with Hunter C50.

Recommendation: Yes — if your priority is practical mileage in mixed conditions, this bike appears to meet that goal strongly.

Original video