Video summary

Insta360 X5 vs. DJI Osmo360 | DER VERGLEICH

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product(s) compared

  • Insta360 X5 (new)
  • DJI Osmo 360 (DJI’s first 360° camera)

Key features & specs mentioned

Insta360 X5

  • Processing chips: 3 AI chips for image processing
  • Sensor size: slightly smaller than DJI — just over 1.28”
  • Max video resolution/FPS: 8K up to 30 FPS
  • High-speed mode: 4K up to 120 FPS
  • Color depth: 8-bit max
  • Log profile: Insta360 Log (listed as “esog”/Insta360 Log in subtitles)
  • Adaptive Tone / HDR: extra mode for changing lighting (e.g., backlight transitions, sunshine → shade)
  • Battery life (listed): 208 minutes at 5.7K 24 FPS
    • Real-world claim: “lasted all night”
  • Weight: 200 g
  • Storage: records only with an SD card inserted
  • Audio hardware: front microphone with integrated windscreen
  • Waterproof rating: 15 m
  • Cloud/software: cloud subscription + automatic upload over Wi‑Fi; cloud editing mentioned
  • Display: larger screen than DJI (easier for quick checking and settings)

DJI Osmo 360

  • Processing chips: 1 AI chip
  • Sensor size: 1 / 1.15” (slightly larger than X5)
  • Max video resolution/FPS: 8K up to 50 FPS
  • High-speed mode: 4K up to 100 FPS
  • Color depth: 10-bit
  • Log profile: DLOG
  • Battery life (listed): 190 minutes at 5.7K 24 FPS
    • Real-world claim: required two batteries in the same “all night” use-case
  • Weight: 183 g (smaller/lighter)
  • Storage: internal storage (no SD card required; similar to DJI’s Action 5 Pro family)
  • Interfaces/UX: controls described as conceptually similar, but screen is smaller
  • Waterproof rating: 10 m
  • Replaceable lens: yes, but requires sending it in (service process)

Main software/UX experience (big emphasis)

Editing & reframing experience

  • Insta360 Studio: described as more user-friendly / more intuitive

    • Includes tutorials on first open
    • Editing support for reframing (dragging 360 footage into editor)

  • Crucial missing DJI feature: Tracking

    • Insta360 editing supports tracking (choose a subject to follow; software adjusts perspective/view automatically)
    • Reviewer calls DJI’s lack of tracking “rubbish”, saying it’s cumbersome because you must manually realign using keyframes
    • This affected clip consistency (“perspectives… aren’t exactly identical” across some examples)

Image quality comparison

  • Reviewer does not declare a definitive winner on raw image quality.
  • Claimed that both are excellent in:
    • Bright light
    • Low light
  • Test approach: identical settings between cameras, with only bitrate/maxing settings adjusted.

Battery & portability pros/cons

Insta360 X5 (cons / limitations)

  • Shorter/limited recording workflow: needs SD card for recording
  • Larger/heavier: 200 g
  • Battery advantage exists but spec and real-world are framed as “Insta360 lasted all night” (i.e., DJI underperformed in use)

DJI Osmo 360 (cons / limitations)

  • Battery performance worse in practice: required more batteries than Insta360 for the same outing
  • Smaller screen: harder for quick footage checking and settings changes

DJI Osmo 360 (pros)

  • Replaceable batteries: reviewer likes this due to existing DJI battery ecosystem; batteries charge quickly
  • Internal storage: can record without SD card
  • Higher color depth: 10-bit
  • Higher max 8K FPS: 8K up to 50 FPS
  • Lighter/smaller body

Noise/image processing explanation (why Insta360 is said to be stronger)

  • Reviewer argues larger sensor alone doesn’t guarantee better results (example referenced: older OneRS/OneS 1-inch edition performing worse despite larger sensor).
  • Claimed differentiation (as described):
    1. Process 360° data from sensors
    2. Handle noise + color adjustments
    3. Combine lens images + stabilization + marker detection
  • Conclusion stated: this makes X5 “unbeatable” for noise and image processing.

Lens system comparison (unique detailed concern)

Insta360 X5 (pros)

  • Includes lens protectors in packaging
  • Lens replacement is user-friendly: reviewer claims you can swap lenses yourself with a tool (unscrew/replace quickly)
  • Strong preference due to 360 recording visibility: scratches/dirt show up clearly

DJI Osmo 360 (con)

  • Lens is replaceable only via sending it in
  • Reviewer cites costs: ~€25 per lens, and ~€45 for both (approximate phrasing: “I think”)
  • Reviewer questions why DJI didn’t offer self-service replacement

Waterproof rating

  • X5: 15 m
  • DJI: 10 m

Unique points mentioned (consolidated list)

  1. Insta360 has 3 AI chips; DJI has 1
  2. Sensor size: X5 slightly smaller (~1.28”); DJI slightly larger (1/1.15”)
  3. Max 8K: X5 30 FPS vs DJI 50 FPS
  4. 4K high frame rate: X5 120 FPS vs DJI 100 FPS
  5. Color depth: X5 8-bit vs DJI 10-bit
  6. Log: X5 (Insta360 Log / “esog”) vs DJI DLOG
  7. Adaptive Tone/HDR mode on Insta360
  8. Battery (rated): X5 208 min vs DJI 190 min at 5.7K 24 FPS
  9. Battery real-world: X5 “lasted all night”; DJI needed two batteries
  10. Weight/size: X5 200 g; DJI 183 g (DJI smaller/lighter)
  11. Storage: X5 needs SD card; DJI has internal storage
  12. Audio: X5 has front mic with integrated windscreen
  13. Waterproof: X5 15 m; DJI 10 m
  14. Cloud subscription & auto-upload for Insta360 (Wi‑Fi upload; cloud editing)
  15. Insta360 Studio is more intuitive with tutorials
  16. Tracking feature: exists on Insta360; DJI lacks it (major workflow complaint)
  17. Editing impact: DJI requires keyframe realignment, causing less consistent perspectives
  18. Image quality (day/night) described as excellent for both, but no final judgment on raw quality winner
  19. Screen size: X5 larger screen helps quick checking/settings; DJI smaller though responsive
  20. Battery capacities quoted: 2400 mAh (Insta360) vs 1950 mAh (DJI)
  21. Larger sensor doesn’t equal better quality (older 1-inch example referenced)
  22. Insta360’s chip division improves noise/image processing
  23. Lens protectors included with X5; Insta360 allows self lens swap
  24. DJI lens replacement requires mail-in/service; cited €25/€45 approximate cost
  25. Reviewer view: DJI Osmo 360 is “entry ticket”/bare minimum and can’t fully compete in 360 workflow
  26. Final ranking opinion: X5 software/app + 360 workflow still ahead, despite DJI strong spec (8K50)

Pros/Cons summary (as expressed by reviewer)

Insta360 X5

  • Pros: best software workflow (especially tracking), better noise/processing (per chips), integrated windscreen mic, 15 m waterproof, longer battery in practice, lens protectors + easier lens swapping, larger screen
  • Cons: SD-card-dependent recording; 8K limited to 30 FPS; max 8-bit color

DJI Osmo 360

  • Pros: internal storage; replaceable batteries (fast charging, compatible with existing DJI packs); higher max specs (8K50, 10-bit); smaller/lighter; lens is replaceable via service
  • Cons: no tracking in editor (major), worse real-world battery life, smaller screen, waterproof only 10 m, lens replacement inconvenient/expensive

Overall verdict / recommendation (concise)

  • The reviewer’s overall recommendation is Insta360 X5, largely because Insta360’s editing software and tracking feature dramatically improve the 360° workflow.
  • DJI Osmo 360 is viewed as a capable spec competitor (8K50/10-bit) but not equal in day-to-day 360° usability due to lacking tracking.

Speakers

  • Single speaker/reviewer throughout the subtitles (no separate speakers indicated).

Original video