Video summary

Review Tanchjim Bunny | Vokalnya Enak, Bisa Gaming, EQnya Banyak | Vindtech Review

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

Tanchjim/Tangzim Bunny (DSP USB Type‑C IEM / “chicken” in the video’s wording) — positioned as a favorite in the under Rp500,000 price class, especially for vocal tuning and EQ/gaming features.


Main features mentioned

DSP + USB Type‑C with app support

  • App is available via Tangzim’s official website (not on the Play Store yet).
  • Sound profiles are saved in the DSP memory (not in the phone), so the last EQ can carry over to laptops/PC/DAP/etc. even if the app isn’t installed.
  • The reviewer summarizes total availability as at least ~51 EQ-related presets, broken down as:
    • Official EQ presets: Default, Nature, Balance, Popular, Instrument Enhancement (5 presets)
    • Game EQ: presets by game, with separation for mobile/PC/Nintendo Switch
      • Example games mentioned: Genshin Impact, Honkai, PUBG
      • (Exact number of game presets not fully specified)
    • IQ Forum: community shared EQ presets (14 presets mentioned)
    • Custom EQ: 10-parameter user tuning from 30 Hz to 7500 Hz

Driver / technical basics (as stated)

  • Single dynamic driver configuration
  • Uses DMT4 e technology (mentioned as the same tech family across Tangzim models)
  • Sensitivity: 123 dB
  • Impedance: 30 ohm
  • Frequency range: 8 Hz – 48 kHz

Comfort & fit

  • Said to be comfortable for daily use; seal is good with included tips.
  • Weight described as light; nozzle/angle doesn’t touch ears directly (per reviewer’s comfort experience).

Controls / connection

  • 0.78mm 2-pin cable system retained (reviewer likes it for cable flexibility).
  • Includes a detachable DSP cable with USB Type‑C.
  • Mentions a chin slider that’s quick and stays in place.
  • Cable described as OFC silver-plated, flexible, slightly thick, and not microphonic-heavy.

Included accessories / tips

  • Ear tips: two models
    • Wide bore (white): 4 installed
    • Narrow bore (small): 3 pairs mentioned
  • Packaging note: reviewer did not find the “Asano/AsaNotan” character postcard on this Bunny unit (contrast with earlier Tangzim packaging habits).
  • Includes a rabbit-shaped mock IEM/motif and standard spec print on the back.

Sound signature (what the reviewer says)

Overall tuning

  • Other reviewers’ claim: neutral-bright
  • Reviewer’s take: neutral with a slightly “warm/worm” feel, especially with certain tips (review uses wide tips).

Bass

  • Positioned as a middle solution:
    • Compared to Tangzim Zero (bass too small) and Tangzim One (bass too big)
    • Bunny: balanced sub + mid-bass, punch with depth, good control
  • Transition speed:
    • Slightly slower than Tangzim Zero
    • Not as slow as Tangzim One
  • Bass described as all-rounder, including metal test track mention (DragonForce).

Vocal performance (top strength)

  • Reviewer calls Bunny the best in the price class for vocals.
  • Vocal timbre: similar to Tangzim Zero, but cleaner/neater than Zero.
  • Effects: warm, “wet/dewy” feel while still clean.
  • Works well for male/female vocals (examples mentioned: Yui, Diana Krall, Susan Wong, Christina Perry; Robbie Williams, Bruno Mars, etc.).
  • For rougher shouts (example reference: takawan okerck mention), it’s less fierce, favoring long-listening comfort.

Treble / detail & comfort

  • Not a “treble-head” IEM: treble is “just right” with enough detail.
  • Avoids harshness/pain; described as comfortable.
  • Some “detail-bite” is said to be less aggressive than what treble-focused listeners may want (example tracks mentioned include certain solo/instrumental recordings).

Technicalities

  • More natural than “detail-chasing” (avoids unnatural/metallic timbre).
  • Resolution: good; micro-details present “enough” without feeling forced.
  • Soundstage & imaging:
    • “A little superior” to close competitors
    • Wide, described as heading toward 3D
    • Imaging includes depth/height and left-right depiction
  • Separation: sufficient, roughly on par with class peers.

User experience / usability notes

  • After setting EQ once, profiles persist in the IEM, so switching devices keeps the chosen sound.
  • Gaming EQ is a major selling point: presets per game and per platform (mobile/PC/Switch).
  • Tangzim app described as mature and stable, with abundant features.

Pros (as stated)

  • Excellent vocal tuning for the price; comfortable for long sessions.
  • Balanced bass (between too-small and too-big behavior from other models).
  • Treble comfort: enough detail without harshness.
  • Wide soundstage and strong imaging (near 3D impression).
  • DSP + memory-based EQ saving: works even without the app on other devices.
  • Very feature-rich EQ ecosystem:
    • official presets + game-specific + community IQ Forum + custom EQ
  • Comfortable fit, good seal, light weight.
  • 2-pin compatibility and cable quality (OFC silver-plated, manageable microphonics).

Cons / limitations mentioned

  • Build materials not “luxury”:
    • housing mostly resin up to the nozzle; other parts may be thin or plastic with a finish
    • build is “ordinary but not bad,” with standout mostly in design
  • Treble/detail not for “detail chasers”:
    • lacks extra bite/detail impact some treble-focused listeners want
  • Packaging expectation mismatch:
    • no character postcard in the reviewer’s unit (minor)
  • App availability:
    • not on Play Store; must use the official website link

Comparisons made (other products/models)

Tangzim Zero / Tangzim One (within the lineup)

  • Bunny bass sits between them.
  • Bunny improves vocal neatness versus Zero and avoids some harshness.
  • Transition speed described relative to Zero/One.

Competitors mentioned

  • TRN/Trer/Terrgate-like models (names partially garbled in subtitles; examples include “TR… eargate” and “tr… cons”)
    • Bunny described as more natural in timbre
    • Bunny soundstage/imaging claimed a bit superior to close competitors

DSP competitor example

  • NF Audio RG15 mentioned as an example of no application support even though it’s DSP
  • Bunny praised for having mature app features, unlike such competitors

Ratings / numerical scores

  • No formal numeric rating score (e.g., 4.5/5) is given.
  • Price references:
    • DSP version: ~Rp369,000
    • Standard 3.5mm jack version: ~Rp319,000
    • Reviewer’s target range conclusion: ~Rp320,000–370,000
  • Technical specs given:
    • 123 dB sensitivity, 30 ohm impedance, 8 Hz – 48 kHz range

Overall verdict (concise)

Recommended, especially if you prioritize vocal clarity/comfort, balanced bass, and want DSP EQ with extensive gaming preset support. At ~Rp320k–370k, the reviewer calls the Tangzim Bunny worth it and the best in its price class for vocals, with the caveat that it’s not the most “detail-bite/treble-forcing” option and the build isn’t as premium as higher-end models.


Speaker views

  • Single main reviewer provides essentially all impressions: daily-driver experience (2 weeks), detailed sound tuning evaluation, app/DSP feature breakdown, and comparisons.

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video