Video summary
Mary Beard: Why no film has ever cracked The Odyssey
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas / concepts / lessons
-
Why filmmakers struggle with The Odyssey
- Mary Beard expresses excitement about Christopher Nolan’s film adaptation, noting that The Odyssey has “not had much luck with filmmakers” so far.
- She hopes Nolan’s version will help audiences really get into the story and encourage rediscovery of the Odyssey.
-
What The Odyssey is (and is not)
- Beard challenges the common view of the Odyssey as merely a set of “tales of daring-do.”
- Instead, she describes it as:
- One man’s attempt to get home (Odysseus’ journey).
- A deep exploration of identity and what it means to be a man.
- A focus on growing up, especially through Telemachus (Odysseus’ son), rather than only Odysseus as the hero.
- She calls it the “most complicated post-modern epic”, especially due to its structure and narrative complexity.
-
The narrative complexity and structure
- The poem starts “right in the middle of things,” so the audience does not immediately “see” Odysseus.
- It zooms in on Ithaca and Odysseus’ family before the hero is fully present.
- Even when dramatic stories are told (e.g., earlier adventures), they’re typically relayed secondhand—Odysseus tells them to someone else—rather than presented as firsthand experience.
-
How oral culture shaped the work
- Beard argues it’s hard for modern readers to grasp the sophistication of oral audiences.
- She suggests the Odyssey likely emerged in bardic culture, involving:
- Partly interlocking, partly formulaic tales,
- Sung/performed in an oral, fluid setting (e.g., around a campfire or after dinner),
- Episodes that could vary depending on audience demand (e.g., “Have the cyclops tonight”).
- She estimates this oral phase spans roughly from around the 10th century BCE onward (as discussed).
-
Transition to writing and continued editing
- Beard believes the Odyssey probably took some written form after generations of oral performance, possibly around the 8th century BCE.
- She emphasizes uncertainty about authorship, including whether “Homer” is involved.
- She also claims the poem was still being tidied up and altered as late as the 5th century BCE, and even then likely retained an oral dimension.
- Later antiquity readers are described as engaging in close, careful study, similar to modern interpretation.
-
Translation as interpretation (and why it matters)
- Beard argues it’s a mistake to be overly prescriptive about which translation someone must read—if you can find an English version you engage with, that’s the key.
- She stresses that all translations are interpretations, and different eras translate in ways that fit their own audiences.
- Example: 19th-century translations can sound “stilted” because they were written for 19th-century readers, not modern ones.
- Two contemporary translations she recommends:
- Emily Wilson (noted by Beard as the first English translation by a woman).
- Daniel Mendelson (described as excellent and very readable).
-
A concrete example of how translation changes meaning: slavery
- Beard contrasts translation choices for slaves in Penelope’s household and among Odysseus’ wife and son Telemachus in Ithaca.
- In Wilson’s translation (as Beard describes it), she uses the direct word “slaves” (and/or “enslaved”).
- In older mainstream translations (especially from the 1950s and before), “serving girl” (a euphemism) was commonly used.
- Beard argues this alters readers’ understanding of society in the Odyssey:
- Wilson makes slavery more visible and clear.
- Beard says both approaches can be legitimate, but Wilson encourages more careful attention to social status.
-
How translators grapple with difficult Greek terms
- Beard highlights the opening description of Odysseus using the Greek adjective polyropos, meaning roughly “much-turning / much-adapting / many turns.” She explains multiple interpretive possibilities.
- Scholars and translators debate what it implies, including:
- winding/circuitous routes home,
- difficulty,
- cleverness,
- or even negative traits (e.g., untrustworthy).
- Her takeaway: a good translation includes notes showing uncertainty and decision-making, so readers see translation as an interpretive experiment, not gospel.
-
Suggested way to engage the Odyssey (podcast / book-club approach)
- Beard says her podcast Instant Classics will include reading/discussing the Odyssey.
- She describes a book club approach:
- reading the Odyssey over about a year, and
- discussing it book-by-book to “talk it through.”
Methodology / instructions presented
-
To appreciate a film adaptation like Nolan’s Odyssey
- Get into the source text first: find out “what the text is from which this movie is going to come.”
- Use that reading as a basis for more informed criticism and appreciation of the film.
-
To choose a translation (recommended general approach)
- Don’t be overly prescriptive.
- Pick an English translation you can actually engage with (even from a secondhand shop or online).
- Prefer a readable, modern translation; Beard specifically suggests:
- Emily Wilson
- Daniel Mendelson
-
How to read translation critically
- Treat translation choices as interpretations, not unquestionable truths.
- When meaning is contested (e.g., words like polyropos), look for:
- translator notes,
- explanations of alternative readings,
- the reasons behind word choices.
- “Get messy” by interrogating translation decisions rather than accepting them passively.
-
Engagement format for learning the Odyssey
- Use a long-form guided approach such as a year-long book club that reads the work book-by-book.
Speakers / sources featured
- Speaker: Mary Beard
- Referenced creators / works:
- Christopher Nolan (film adaptation of The Odyssey)
- Emily Wilson (translation of The Odyssey)
- Daniel Mendelson (translation of The Odyssey)
- “Homer” / ancient authorship tradition (mentioned as uncertain/possibly irrelevant)
- “Big Think” (channel membership/support referenced)
- Instant Classics (Mary Beard’s podcast/book-club project)