Video summary

ASUS Strix G16 - A Great Gaming Laptop, Except for...

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

ASUS ROG Strix G16 (Eclipse Gray) — Key Points From the Review

Overall verdict

A strong, well-built mid-range gaming laptop with excellent screen and good performance, but the reviewer’s main criticism is that the current price is too high compared to competing 4060/4070 options. Buy it only if it’s discounted to a competitive price.


Main features highlighted

Build / Design

  • Eclipse gray finish (more muted than the Volt Green option)
  • Smooth, sturdy plastic interior; only slight flex under pressure
  • RGB light bar on the front even on the gray model
  • Lid opens easily thanks to a sticking lid design; hinge sounded like it may be rubbing (likely unit-specific)

Size / Weight

  • 16” model, slightly thicker at the back than typical 15” gaming laptops
  • Weight:
    • ~5.2 lb / 2.4 kg (laptop)
    • ~7.1 lb / 3.2 kg with the included 280W charger
  • Weight varies by configuration (280W vs 330W power bricks on higher-spec models)

Configuration tested

  • Intel Core i7-13650HX
  • RTX 4060
  • 16GB RAM
  • 16” 240Hz display

Keyboard / Inputs

  • 4-zone RGB per-key lighting (looks cool but can make letters harder to read depending on lighting)
  • Key travel: 1.9mm, with a nice clicky feel
  • Extra keys for volume/mute/performance mode/Armory Crate
  • Minor annoyance: short right Shift
  • Touchpad: ~10% larger this year; feels good to click
  • Touchpad/“numpad” built-in option shown online but missing on this unit

Ports / Connectivity

  • Most ports on the left:
    • Power, Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI 2.1, two Type-C
      • Left Type-C: Thunderbolt 4
      • Right Type-C: USB 3.2 Gen 2
  • Right side:
    • Two USB-A (Gen 2) ports
  • No ports on the back

Display output behavior

  • Thunderbolt 4 routes to Intel iGPU (whether Optimus is on/off)
  • The other Type-C + HDMI route to Nvidia GPU
  • HDMI verified: 4K LG B9 at 120Hz, 12-bit with G-Sync
  • Type-C (front-most) supports charging; Thunderbolt 4 does not

Upgradeability / Internals

  • Easy-ish access: 11 Phillips screws
  • 2023 design avoids prior year bottom-panel RGB ribbon-cable risks
  • Internals layout:
    • Battery at the front
    • 2 RAM slots above
    • SSD on the right
    • Spare M.2 slot on the left above the Wi‑Fi 6E card

Storage

  • Tested 1TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD
  • Both M.2 slots can fit up to 4TB drives (chips on both sides)
  • Upgrade score: RAM + Wi‑Fi replaceable “without any problems”
  • Wi‑Fi performance: very good, in line with other laptops using the same Intel card

Speakers / Audio

  • Speakers are front-left and front-right
  • Clear sound, but tinny without bass at higher volumes
  • Best sound noted around 50% volume (above average for a gaming laptop)

Battery / Power features

  • 90Wh (4-cell) battery
  • Battery care mode (via MyASUS): limits charge to 80%
  • Panel power saver enabled by default:
    • Screen drops to 60Hz when unplugged, then back to 240Hz when plugged in
    • Causes a brief black flash during refresh-rate switching

Battery life results

  • ~5 hours YouTube playback
  • ~1h 50m in gaming (called above average)

Thermals / Cooling

  • 3 fans, 7 heatpipes
  • Liquid metal used on CPU in this design (GPU liquid metal noted for top-end configs; for this unit, it’s specifically described as CPU-focused)
  • Airflow explains no back ports; exhausts from left/right and back
  • Dust filters over intakes

Software / Performance modes

  • Armory Crate performance modes: silent, performance, turbo, manual
  • Manual mode allows control of:
    • fan speed
    • CPU/GPU power limits
    • GPU temperature limit
    • GPU OC
  • Turbo vs manual performance: fairly similar FPS, with manual being more controllable

Display and latency (strong positives)

  • Nebula 16” 2560×1600 240Hz panel tested
  • Color/gamut: described as seriously impressive
  • Brightness:
    • “fairly bright,” but reviewer didn’t consistently see ASUS’s claimed 500 nits
    • possible panel-to-panel variance
  • Backlight bleed: none detected (may vary)
  • Response time:
    • Overdrive on: ~3.7ms avg GtG
    • Overdrive off: slower (but removes overshoot/undershoot)
    • Claimed as one of the best non‑OLED measured results in class
  • System latency (CS:GO): described as quite fast, not noticeably worse than earlier testing

Performance & benchmarks (RTX 4060 context)

General take

  • RTX 4060 performance is described as solid but lower than higher-tier configs
  • Reviewer says it can feel smoother in some games due to better 1% lows

Game comparisons

  • Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p/1440p)
    • Lower than some RTX 4060 expectations, but differences are small
    • fewer dips / better 1% low → smoother feel
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
    • Basically tied with Helios Neo 16 for best RTX 4060 result
  • Control
    • Noted as performing better on Nvidia GPUs
    • Strix G16 shows about 22% higher average FPS vs ASUS TUF A16 (AMD-based)
    • Emphasis again on stronger 1% low at 1440p

Bigger picture

  • Reviewer claims RTX 4070 laptops aren’t much better than 4060, implying a more meaningful jump requires 4080/4090

CPU behavior / power

  • CPU can reach very high power limits (close to 90W in stress testing)
  • On battery, performance drops hard in multi-core
  • Thermal throttling possible in extreme manual max settings (worst-case)

Thermals / feel

  • Keyboard idle temps similar to most laptops (~low 30°C range)
  • Middle area warmer under stress but “didn’t feel uncomfortable”
  • Fans:
    • silent at idle
    • manual max is quite loud (headphones recommended)

Connectivity / Graphics switching (MUX / Optimus)

  • Has a MUX switch
  • Can disable Optimus (reboot via Armour Crate “Ultimate mode”)
  • Supports advanced Optimus
  • G-Sync support when Optimus is off

MUX/Optimus behavior

  • TB4 always uses Intel iGPU
  • Other Type-C + HDMI use Nvidia dGPU

Linux support (mixed)

  • Ubuntu 23.04 live CD:
    • Keyboard, touchpad, camera, Ethernet, Wi‑Fi worked by default
    • Speakers did not work
    • Aura key didn’t switch off default rainbow effect (but brightness/RGB shortcut keys worked)

Ratings / numerical results mentioned

  • Battery life
    • ~5 hours (YouTube)
    • ~1h 50m (gaming)
  • Weights
    • ~5.2 lb / 2.4 kg (laptop)
    • ~7.1 lb / 3.2 kg with charger
    • Charger wattage varies by configuration
  • Display response
    • ~3.7ms avg GtG with overdrive
  • Audio
    • best sound around ~50% volume
  • Performance comparisons
    • Control: ~22% higher avg FPS vs ASUS TUF A16 (per reviewer)

(No formal star rating/score was given.)


Pros (unique points)

  • Strong build quality; smooth/sturdy feel
  • Very good upgradeability (RAM, Wi‑Fi, M.2 slots; supports large 4TB SSDs)
  • Excellent 16” 2560×1600 240Hz Nebula display (color, response time, low bleed)
  • Good gaming smoothness in some titles via better 1% lows
  • Great external display support tested (HDMI 4K @ 120Hz + G-Sync)
  • Good keyboard feel and typing experience
  • Good Wi‑Fi performance
  • Solid battery life for a gaming laptop (especially gaming endurance)
  • Low latency responsiveness described as fast for the class
  • Fans silent at idle; thermals generally well-controlled

Cons (unique points)

  • Price too high at the time of recording vs competition (main critique)
  • RGB key lighting can make characters harder to read in some lighting
  • Short right Shift may annoy some users
  • Touchpad “numpad” feature shown online appears missing on the tested unit
  • Hinge made noise on open/close (possible rubbing; uncertain long-term)
  • Speakers become tinny at higher volume (bass lacking)
  • Refresh-rate switching causes brief black flashes when unplugging/plugging
  • Manual max performance settings are very loud
  • Linux: speakers don’t work in the reviewer’s Ubuntu live test
  • Limited BIOS customization compared to some competitors (e.g., MSI)

Pricing / competition comparisons (major buying factor)

  • Reviewer claims (at the time):
    • RTX 4060 config not widely available at major retailers; found via reseller around $1600
    • described as too expensive for a 4060
  • Suggested alternative pricing:
    • RTX 4050: $1190
    • RTX 4070: $2200
  • Discounts mentioned:
    • Lenovo Legion Pro 5 can be ~$700 less
  • Conclusion:
    • Strix G16 is good, but value depends heavily on sales/price
  • Suggested next watch:
    • Lenovo LOQ 15/16 (cheaper, fewer features, similar gaming performance to Strix in earlier comparisons)

Speaker viewpoints

  • Single main reviewer voice covering:
    • design/build, ports, upgradeability, display, thermals, performance, battery, software, Linux, and pricing/value

Final recommendation

Recommend only if the ASUS Strix G16 (RTX 4060) is discounted to a competitive price. Its strengths—especially the display, thermals/performance tuning, and upgradeability—make it a strong gaming option, but the reviewer believes its current price undermines the value versus competing models (Legion Pro 5, LOQ, and other 4060/4070 deals).

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video