the ONLY cars in india that are ACTUALLY fun to drive

Main takeaway

The video argues that a car is genuinely fun to drive because of its steering, chassis, suspension and handling—not merely because it is fast or has sporty styling. It recommends nine cars across budget, higher-priced and “middle-class” categories.

The presenter gives no formal ratings or scores and stresses that performance should be explored on a track, not on public roads.

Cars reviewed

Budget picks

Citroën C3 Turbo

• Pros: Weighs around 1,000 kg and has a 1.2-litre turbo engine producing 110 hp and 190 Nm, paired with a six-speed manual. The presenter praises its light weight and rally-inspired character, and says its power-to-weight ratio exceeds that of the Fortuner’s 2.8-litre engine. Progressive hydraulic shock absorbers are also highlighted.
• Cons: The interior is described as cheap-looking, with hard plastics. Citroën’s dealer network is said to be very small.
• Overall: A modest-looking car that the presenter sees as a lively, rally-bred “wolf in sheep’s clothing.”

Škoda Kushaq

• Pros: The MQB platform, high-strength steel and laser welding are credited with making the body rigid and helping the car stay composed through corners and at speed. The cited engine is a 1.0-litre TSI producing 115 hp and 170 Nm, paired with a six-speed manual.
• Cons: No clear product-specific drawback is given.
• Overall: Presented as an enthusiast-friendly platform at an unusually accessible price. The transcript’s price and wheelbase references are unclear.

Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo

• Pros: Weighs around 1,000 kg. Its turbo engine is described as delivering a strong surge once the turbo comes on, making the car feel quick in traffic.
• Cons: The presenter criticizes Maruti’s electric steering for providing little road feedback, and says the Fronx is no exception. It is also weak at low revs before the turbo kicks in.
• Overall: Fun mainly for its light weight and sudden acceleration, rather than its steering feel.

Higher-priced performance picks

BMW M340i xDrive

• Pros: The video says it is locally assembled in Tamil Nadu. Its 3.0-litre B58 inline-six produces 374 hp and 500 Nm; the presenter quotes a 0–100 km/h time of 4.4 seconds. The xDrive system is said to send most power to the rear until more traction is needed. The electronic M Sport differential and variable sport steering are praised.
• Cons: No specific driving-related drawback is mentioned.
• Overall: Described as a particularly compelling fast road car and an Indian-market “cheat code.”

Mercedes-AMG A45 S

• Pros: Its 2.0-litre turbo four-cylinder makes 421 hp. Two rear clutch packs can direct power to the outside rear wheel, enabling an aggressive drift mode and strong corner exits.
• Cons: The suspension is described as extremely stiff, transmitting even small road imperfections.
• Overall: A hugely powerful, intense hatchback—exciting, but potentially uncomfortable on rough roads. The presenter claims its power per litre exceeds that of the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport.

Porsche 718 Cayman

• Pros: The mid-engine layout is praised for its balance and quick responses. The presenter highlights precise steering feedback and the car’s ability to turn sharply and predictably. Used examples are said to cost around ₹75–85 lakh.
• Cons: Porsche has discontinued the model, so the video says it is no longer available new. It is a two-seater and is framed as best suited to an experienced driving enthusiast.
• Overall: The most purist-focused choice, with its handling attributed to the mid-engine layout and carefully tuned steering and chassis.

“Middle-class” picks

Hyundai i20 N Line

• Pros: It has a six-speed manual with three pedals, dampers said to be 30% stiffer than the standard setup, quicker steering, disc brakes at all four wheels and a tuned dual exhaust. The presenter calls it the only properly hardware-modified hot hatch under ₹15 lakh.
• Cons: No specific drawback is stated.
• Comparisons: The presenter argues that the more powerful Creta Turbo is tall, rolls heavily, has numb steering and intrusive stability control. The Verna Turbo is said to be quick in a straight line but tuned for comfort, with soft suspension and little steering feedback.
• Overall: The presenter’s preferred Hyundai for handling and driver involvement, rather than outright power.

Volkswagen Virtus GT

• Pros: The presenter’s favourite of the list and, in their view, the country’s best price-to-performance proposition. Its MQB platform is praised for rigidity and high-speed stability; the car is said to settle quickly after bumps, even while cornering. The 1.5 TSI makes 150 hp and 250 Nm, and the version discussed has a seven-speed DSG.
• Cons: The presenter regrets that Volkswagen removed the manual transmission from the 1.5 TSI.
• Overall: Recommended for its balance, composure and performance, especially on highways and winding roads.

Mahindra BE

The vehicle is named “Mahindra BE” in the subtitles.

• Pros: The only full EV on the list. Its dedicated skateboard platform sends up to 286 hp and 380 Nm to the rear wheels, with a multi-link independent rear suspension. The presenter praises its rear-drive layout, steering response and potential for playful handling, and says Mahindra has demonstrated strong suspension engineering.
• Cons: The exterior design is heavily criticized as ugly, over-styled and cluttered with fake vents and awkward proportions.
• Overall: An impressive technical setup undermined, in the presenter’s view, by the styling. They suggest the same drivetrain and chassis would be appealing in a low, attractive station wagon.

Overall verdict

The video favours cars that provide mechanical engagement—steering feedback, stable suspension and a responsive chassis—over feature-heavy crossovers.

• Presenter’s personal favourite: Volkswagen Virtus GT
• Purist’s choice: Porsche 718 Cayman
• Affordable hot hatch: Hyundai i20 N Line
• Fun for acceleration, but weak on steering feel: Maruti Suzuki Fronx Turbo
• Praised for engineering, criticized for styling: Mahindra BE

Speaker perspective: The subtitles contain one presenter’s opinions throughout; no other speakers offer separate evaluations.